Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Local 357 officially supports TA!!! >

Local 357 officially supports TA!!!

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Local 357 officially supports TA!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2014, 02:05 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 754
Default Local 357 officially supports TA!!!

The IBT ALD and Local 357 supports a TA that:

Offers pay increases that barely cover inflation, pays FO's less than Dispatchers, and has the least increase where 70% of the group is located. The bulk will see a $3-7 increase.

36mo/seat lock for the Q400

Hot reserve

Co-basing

Vague language subject to interpretation

Deadhead pay based on scheduled block time, not actual

Must be contactable when on duty

No hard staffing requirements (a % of reserves vs lineholders, or pilots vs block hours, etc)

The overtime pay is next to impossible to actually reach

Company may force captains to bid FO lines

1% cost of living increase per year

And that is just the tip of the ice berg!!!
Joachim is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 02:18 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EvilMonkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Chris's Closet
Posts: 485
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
The IBT ALD and Local 357 supports a TA that:

Offers pay increases that barely cover inflation, pays FO's less than Dispatchers, and has the least increase where 70% of the group is located. The bulk will see a $3-7 increase.

36mo/seat lock for the Q400

Hot reserve

Co-basing

Vague language subject to interpretation

Deadhead pay based on scheduled block time, not actual

Must be contactable when on duty

No hard staffing requirements (a % of reserves vs lineholders, or pilots vs block hours, etc)

The overtime pay is next to impossible to actually reach

Company may force captains to bid FO lines

1% cost of living increase per year

And that is just the tip of the ice berg!!!
Yes Sir, it's a bona fide concessionary TA. Hopefully their 50%+1 gambit doesn't pan out. We need to vote this thing down in a big way.
EvilMonkey is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 02:46 PM
  #3  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

I was greatly underwhelmed when I read the TA after hearing the rumors it was going to be awesome. RAH is parking a bunch of airplanes with millions in admitted losses, future staffing is in doubt....and this is what they offer? Anybody recall that scene in the Big Lebowski at the funeral home where Walter shoves the bill back and asks, "What's this?"

I do wish you guys the best, vote as you see fit.
block30 is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 03:37 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,150
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
The IBT ALD and Local 357 supports a TA that:

Offers pay increases that barely cover inflation, pays FO's less than Dispatchers, and has the least increase where 70% of the group is located. The bulk will see a $3-7 increase.

36mo/seat lock for the Q400

Hot reserve

Co-basing

Vague language subject to interpretation

Deadhead pay based on scheduled block time, not actual

Must be contactable when on duty

No hard staffing requirements (a % of reserves vs lineholders, or pilots vs block hours, etc)

The overtime pay is next to impossible to actually reach

Company may force captains to bid FO lines

1% cost of living increase per year

And that is just the tip of the ice berg!!!
Actually only the IBT ALD and the negotiating committee support it. The E-board had/has no comment.

Try again. Mass hysteria will not prevail.

(I'm a very calm no voter.)
Geardownflaps30 is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 04:01 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B-73N FO
Posts: 532
Default

IBT 357 has no comment, the IBT airline division supports this turd
Emb170man is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 04:09 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Must be contactable when on duty
Is this for real? If true then Joe C. must be laughing his arse off, wherever he is......probably in hell.....
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 07:55 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joachim's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 754
Default

Originally Posted by Geardownflaps30
Actually only the IBT ALD and the negotiating committee support it. The E-board had/has no comment.

Try again. Mass hysteria will not prevail.

(I'm a very calm no voter.)
Nope,

Our own guys were sitting in on it and the comment was. We have used all of our leverage.

I guess i'm gonna be "that guy" however this is worth it!

We, the newer generation of pilots, are all in this boat together. I feel it is necessary for us to develop unity on a much bigger scale than before. We are being played as pawns against each other. I could be another quiet no voter, but I believe the IBT is playing into the company's hand. There is too much secrecy, too little gain, and too much duplicity.

Last edited by Joachim; 03-08-2014 at 08:13 PM.
Joachim is offline  
Old 03-08-2014, 08:10 PM
  #8  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Position: horizontal
Posts: 88
Default

Originally Posted by block30
I was greatly underwhelmed when I read the TA after hearing the rumors it was going to be awesome. RAH is parking a bunch of airplanes with millions in admitted losses, future staffing is in doubt....and this is what they offer? Anybody recall that scene in the Big Lebowski at the funeral home where Walter shoves the bill back and asks, "What's this?"

I do wish you guys the best, vote as you see fit.


"Just cause we're bereaved doesn't make us saps!"

Last edited by slats fail; 03-08-2014 at 08:23 PM.
slats fail is offline  
Old 03-09-2014, 04:40 AM
  #9  
Kerbal Rocket Surgeon
 
Phuz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DTW 717A
Posts: 1,099
Default

But I was told by a Republic CA that they were gonna get a contract that would "rival mainline" contracts. Guess he musta meant on the NEXT one 12 years from now.
Phuz is offline  
Old 03-09-2014, 05:48 AM
  #10  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 5
Default

Originally Posted by Joachim
The IBT ALD and Local 357 supports a TA that:

Offers pay increases that barely cover inflation, pays FO's less than Dispatchers, and has the least increase where 70% of the group is located. The bulk will see a $3-7 increase.

36mo/seat lock for the Q400

Hot reserve

Co-basing

Vague language subject to interpretation

Deadhead pay based on scheduled block time, not actual

Must be contactable when on duty

No hard staffing requirements (a % of reserves vs lineholders, or pilots vs block hours, etc)

The overtime pay is next to impossible to actually reach

Company may force captains to bid FO lines

1% cost of living increase per year

And that is just the tip of the ice berg!!!
Sorry pal, but you have it all wrong. Instead of shooting from the hip about things I did not know, I tracked down one of the negotiators and here are the answers he gave me:

Pay increases exceed historical inflation rate by more than 1% per year. F/O pay is just below the average highs among RAH's peer group, and well above the average of that peer group. First year F/O pay is the highest in that peer group and 9th year matches exactly the average high in that peer group. Hourly pay rate increases for F/O range from 11% per year to more than 29%.

There is no "hot reserve." There is long call reserve, short call reserve and airport standby, as contemplated by FAR 117. All three have considerable scheduling and pay protections that don't exist in our current CBA, which are designed to prevent company abuse.

Co-basing can only occur with mutual agreement on the terms, logistics and conditions between the Company and Union on a location by location basis. As of the DOS, there will be no co-bases that have such an agreement, including the example of the New York area listed in the LOA.

While language might appear vague to average pilot, the company and the union reached a large number of understandings of intent regarding such language that is recorded in the agreed upon record of joint bargaining notes between the parties.

Pilots must be contactable by their employer when at work and on duty--ONLY WHEN on duty and NOT when on a layover, in rest or on days-off. However, if reassigned when at work, there are all kinds of pay and scheduling protections, including extra pay for "plus-ups" and overblocking. In exchange, RAH pilots DO NOT continue to NOT have any form of junior manning, which each and every one of our peers has in some form or fashion. Consequently, days off at RAH are, in fact, days off and the abillity to commute home as planned is greatly enhanced.

Hard staffing requirements rarely, if ever, exist in the airline industry. However, new FAR 117 rules, along with the duty and trip rigs will force the company to staff in a more efficient manner.

On a historical basis, premium pay, while reached by a significant number of pilots each month, has never been that valuable a provision. Consequently, the threshold was raised from 85 to 87 in exchange for a number of more valuable provisions.

Company has to first allow captains to bid to fly as F/O. If insufficient number bid, then company can assign captains to fly as F/O in inverse seniority order. In all cases, such captains exercise their seniority against all F/O when bidding monthly schedules--meaning a junior captain can bid and fly a much more desirable line when flying as F/O then he could hold as F/O. Also, in all cases, such captains are paid their full captain pay and benefits for flying as F/O.

The cola increases are in excess of 4.1% in years 2, 3 & 4 of the contract, and in excess of 4.6% on the amendable date, for a compounded increase of 18.17% over the contracts duration. Those percentages are significantly higher than historical inflation or COLA increases
Corona is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aileron
Part 135
333
07-30-2009 05:39 PM
1515greenlight
Regional
5
04-08-2009 01:37 PM
Beagle_Lover
Atlas/Polar
10
06-03-2008 07:53 AM
CE750
Major
102
03-29-2008 05:32 AM
Amacfa
Flight Schools and Training
10
01-18-2008 02:15 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices