Actual text of RAH TA
03-04-2014, 06:48 PM
#61
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: 737-Right
Posts: 781
Actually, it did have an expiration. Upon ratification of a new CBA. Don't like it, lead a charge to have the assessment removed.
The committee, is chaired by Dan and Eve. That's why they sign it. While line pilots, this isn't their first rodeo and Eve is far more qualified to be there than the average line pilot because of her previous career. You seem to make the assumption that it's just a couple line pilots sitting there. You're wrong. Various committees were consulted, explained their stances and a number of attorneys and experts from other airlines were consulted as well. Had you and others taken a little more interest in happenings there, you would have had a TA long ago. Nobody wanted to run for the eboard, and this is what you ended up with.
For someone who no longer works there, I seem to have a better pulse on the situation than you do.
The committee, is chaired by Dan and Eve. That's why they sign it. While line pilots, this isn't their first rodeo and Eve is far more qualified to be there than the average line pilot because of her previous career. You seem to make the assumption that it's just a couple line pilots sitting there. You're wrong. Various committees were consulted, explained their stances and a number of attorneys and experts from other airlines were consulted as well. Had you and others taken a little more interest in happenings there, you would have had a TA long ago. Nobody wanted to run for the eboard, and this is what you ended up with.
For someone who no longer works there, I seem to have a better pulse on the situation than you do.
03-04-2014, 06:53 PM
#62
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 4,756
03-04-2014, 08:20 PM
#63
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Position: A320 eff oh
Posts: 277
This really makes no sense. What does it matter if I were to break it down in bullet points? I can only cast one vote(and that vote is yes). As far as me "owing" anything to the pilot group: the way I see it is that this pilot group(or at least the idiots who voted for the assessment) owe me the money that I have had to cough up for their stupidity.
03-05-2014, 07:28 AM
#65
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,536
Loon has already admitted that he is voting YES just to stick it to whomever he perceives wronged him. His own words: "cut off my nose to spite my face"
03-05-2014, 07:55 AM
#66
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: 767 CA
Posts: 411
Never argue with an idiot. He'll bring you down to his level and then beat you with experience.
Only a complete moron would vote for a TA that will make you a RSV ***** every moment you're on duty, guarantee your pay raise each year is at least half of the rate of inflation (not counting the giant healthcare increase you're guaranteed to receive), with worthless rigs, CX by trip instead of by leg, 75% DH pay, and holes in the language so large you can fly your shiny 170 through them.
Loon, your screen name is definitely appropriately chosen...
Only a complete moron would vote for a TA that will make you a RSV ***** every moment you're on duty, guarantee your pay raise each year is at least half of the rate of inflation (not counting the giant healthcare increase you're guaranteed to receive), with worthless rigs, CX by trip instead of by leg, 75% DH pay, and holes in the language so large you can fly your shiny 170 through them.
Loon, your screen name is definitely appropriately chosen...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
