Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ALPA: "Don't blame us!"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2014, 04:26 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
proskuneho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Enjoying the view
Posts: 407
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
The solution, is to get the flying where it belongs. In house. I will continue to strive for that. I will not pull the ladder up with me. I've been there. I have friends that are still there. We should all be belting the same call sign that is painted on our fuselage. But at the same time, we are ALL to blame.
Thank you. I voted down the terrible contract precisely because I barely accepted the entry price as it is. I'll go back to a desk job if the conditions get worse. I have a family, and they are more important than a mainline dream job.
proskuneho is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:28 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
National doesn't spend money on local MECs. That's why local MECs have their own treasurers. So that the treasurer can manage the local MEC's budget.
I don't necessarily mean national directly funds local MECs. I mean a large amount of money and resources are spent to support certain pilot groups in their efforts. Therefore their influence is felt in the decision making process of the MECs.
AlaskaBound is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:37 PM
  #73  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by proskuneho
Thank you. I voted down the terrible contract precisely because I barely accepted the entry price as it is. I'll go back to a desk job if the conditions get worse. I have a family, and they are more important than a mainline dream job.
Thank you for doing your part. FWIW(and that might be 0) I voted NO for the last DAL TA because I couldn't swallow giving up 70 more large RJs(there were other things, but I think it's a step in the right direction with our mainline:RJ block hour ratio)

I will continue to strive for bringing it in house.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:40 PM
  #74  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound
I don't necessarily mean national directly funds local MECs. I mean a large amount of money and resources are spent to support certain pilot groups in their efforts. Therefore their influence is felt in the decision making process of the MECs.
I don't agree, but I may have a different point of view simply because I'm a member of a large group. Regardless, I mean what I've stated earlier. I will continue to fight for bringing flying in house. FWIW. I can understand if you don't believe that, but I'll still keep trying.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:41 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 171
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Gladly. As long as you take blame for flying the RJ at the wages you do. Don't point fingers unless you're ready to look in the mirror.

When I was a regional pilot, I didn't scream at mainline guys giving up scope. Why? Because I was just as much to blame.
I don't fly an RJ. I was responding to this:
I think every pilot at a major carrier that pays ALPA dues would wholeheartedly support you guys leaving ALPA. We have subsidized your MEC's for a long time while you were handed flying from our companies. Didn't hear too much complaining on your collective be halves as you readily added new cities and aircraft to the detriment of the mainline pilots. So please by all means: you're cleared for takeoff.
The mainline controls scope. They negotiate for it, so regional pilots did not add new cities to the detriment of anyone. Mainline pilots added those cities by negotiation. That did not start in bankruptcy, that started long ago with deregulation and it was ego driven. They did not want those small planes, so they allowed outsourcing. It bit them and all regional pilots in the ... The outsourcing is the root of this evil and not one single regional pilot is to blame for that. And only mainline can fix outsourcing. 250 hour guys wouldn't be in mainline cockpits, and they never should have been in regional cockpits either.
Dutch1 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:46 PM
  #76  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Dutch1
I don't fly an RJ. I was responding to this:
I think every pilot at a major carrier that pays ALPA dues would wholeheartedly support you guys leaving ALPA. We have subsidized your MEC's for a long time while you were handed flying from our companies. Didn't hear too much complaining on your collective be halves as you readily added new cities and aircraft to the detriment of the mainline pilots. So please by all means: you're cleared for takeoff.
The mainline controls scope. They negotiate for it, so regional pilots did not add new cities to the detriment of anyone. Mainline pilots added those cities by negotiation. That did not start in bankruptcy, that started long ago with deregulation and it was ego driven. They did not want those small planes, so they allowed outsourcing. It bit them and all regional pilots in the ... The outsourcing is the root of this evil and not one single regional pilot is to blame for that. And only mainline can fix outsourcing. 250 hour guys wouldn't be in mainline cockpits, and they never should have been in regional cockpits either.
Mainline pilots don't negotiate for "cities" and outsourcing did not start with deregulation. You're also incorrect in stating that not one single regional pilot is to blame. The planes only move if the pilots move them. PERIOD.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:46 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PCL_128's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Recovering Airline Pilot
Posts: 460
Default

Originally Posted by AlaskaBound
Anyone that believes National doesn't have any influence, pull or say in the local MECs is naive. The politics within the ALPA leadership, local along with national, are deeply intertwined. Local MECs take direction from national.
As someone who has been involved in ALPA from the lowest committee to the highest national governing body, I can tell you without a doubt that you're wrong. ALPA national goes out of its way to avoid giving direction to local MECs. It's actually something that I disagree with. I think there should be more national control, but I'm in the minority on that one.

And the Endeavor seniority list was a result of arbitration because there was no way the 3 carriers were going to agree to an ISL. Just assuming you were or are with 9E since you go by PCL. Ya can't blame ALPA for binding arbitration.
I left Pinnacle years before that integration. I'm talking about our integration at AirTran.
PCL_128 is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:57 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
proskuneho's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: Enjoying the view
Posts: 407
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Mainline pilots don't negotiate for "cities" and outsourcing did not start with deregulation. You're also incorrect in stating that not one single regional pilot is to blame. The planes only move if the pilots move them. PERIOD.
Thank you for voting NOT to send more flying to the regionals. But again, what is the solution for those of us striving to make it to a mainline job? We all can't get good 135 jobs or military time. You yourself said that you bore some of the "blame" for accepting the conditions. All I am saying is that we DID accept the conditions AS THEY WERE when we committed to a flying career. After much investment in career change, flight training, experience building, etc, there comes a point that it is harder to turn back than it is to suck it up and push forward in the hopes for a better future. I will NOT take any more concessions on the way though. I will either find a different road, or I'll just go back to my old career.
proskuneho is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 04:58 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Just another RJ guy
Posts: 906
Default

Originally Posted by PCL_128
As someone who has been involved in ALPA from the lowest committee to the highest national governing body, I can tell you without a doubt that you're wrong. ALPA national goes out of its way to avoid giving direction to local MECs. It's actually something that I disagree with. I think there should be more national control, but I'm in the minority on that one.



I left Pinnacle years before that integration. I'm talking about our integration at AirTran.
I guess our MECs interacted differently with National or visa versa. In each and every email put out by the 9E MEC during the bankruptcy they all mentioned how they were taking direction from national, consulting with national, being guided by national, and how involved national was in their efforts.
AlaskaBound is offline  
Old 01-24-2014, 05:11 PM
  #80  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by proskuneho
Thank you for voting NOT to send more flying to the regionals. But again, what is the solution for those of us striving to make it to a mainline job? We all can't get good 135 jobs or military time. You yourself said that you bore some of the "blame" for accepting the conditions. All I am saying is that we DID accept the conditions AS THEY WERE when we committed to a flying career. After much investment in career change, flight training, experience building, etc, there comes a point that it is harder to turn back than it is to suck it up and push forward in the hopes for a better future. I will NOT take any more concessions on the way though. I will either find a different road, or I'll just go back to my old career.
I applaud you drawing a line in the sand. It takes guts. And I'm not expecting you to shoulder all of the blame. All I want is for regional guys to accept that they are partially to blame. I did. I understand that the opportunities that exist for building time outside of RJs have dropped dramatically. But we still made the choice to fly the jets. The regional pilots do not shoulder all of the blame. But they do shoulder some. Regardless of what other opportunities may or may not exist.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRJAV8OR
Major
36
03-27-2012 11:06 AM
R1200RT
Cargo
1
07-23-2009 11:12 AM
R1200RT
Major
1
07-23-2009 11:07 AM
CE750
Major
102
03-29-2008 05:32 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices