Pinnacle
#181
Might as well. 85% of the Pinnacle guys voted for a new regional low to try and help themselves get onto a mainline list ahead of everyone else. Then they come on here and insult the pilots already on said list. I think it's safe to say that most of us do not like the Pinnacle flow or the situation. I think the fact that the Pinnacle pilots are throwing it in our faces is making the situation worse. The reality is I am guessing only about 1/4 of the Pinnacle pilots that interview will be offered the job. The other 75 percent will be stuck at Pinnacle making $88/hour or less until someone else hires them.
#182
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
The guys Delta hired out of XJ were on a large number of pilot's no fly lists here. How do you account for this? I'm not talking about pre-merger NWA guys here, I'm talking about guys who went through the Delta hiring process from XJ only. Now that they are at DAL perhaps they have changed, but when they were here at XJ, they weren't well liked.
#183
After having flown with guys from all 3 lists, I can tell you that there is definitely precedent to the top 500 thing. The top 500 at original Pinnacle - lifers, DUIs, busts, you name it. XJ and 9L guys have been vastly superior in every way. No wonder our previously crap training program is turning around - they put guys who worked for a much more fair, non-punitive system in place. It's embarassing to go into our crew rooms and hear 9E CAs laughing and wildly throwing out accusations of Colgan people causing stick shakers - apparently we FOs have to do OE for these guys?!
I am not kidding when I say that the old 9E culture was cowboy. It is refreshing to have standard CAs (XJ/9L) at the helm.
I think it's funny to get laughed at by a 9E CA when I call "airspeed" when he is 15+ knots over assigned speed or Vref and I get a hearty laugh and "are you serious??"
I had one guy who I debriefed instead of calling for a go around on an unstabilized approach (when our visual approach criteria had just changed) tell me that he would have ignored my go-around call and continued the landing. Yup "original Pinnacle".
I am not kidding when I say that the old 9E culture was cowboy. It is refreshing to have standard CAs (XJ/9L) at the helm.
I think it's funny to get laughed at by a 9E CA when I call "airspeed" when he is 15+ knots over assigned speed or Vref and I get a hearty laugh and "are you serious??"
I had one guy who I debriefed instead of calling for a go around on an unstabilized approach (when our visual approach criteria had just changed) tell me that he would have ignored my go-around call and continued the landing. Yup "original Pinnacle".
#184
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,648
After having flown with guys from all 3 lists, I can tell you that there is definitely precedent to the top 500 thing. The top 500 at original Pinnacle - lifers, DUIs, busts, you name it. XJ and 9L guys have been vastly superior in every way. No wonder our previously crap training program is turning around - they put guys who worked for a much more fair, non-punitive system in place. It's embarassing to go into our crew rooms and hear 9E CAs laughing and wildly throwing out accusations of Colgan people causing stick shakers - apparently we FOs have to do OE for these guys?!
I am not kidding when I say that the old 9E culture was cowboy. It is refreshing to have standard CAs (XJ/9L) at the helm.
I think it's funny to get laughed at by a 9E CA when I call "airspeed" when he is 15+ knots over assigned speed or Vref and I get a hearty laugh and "are you serious??"
I had one guy who I debriefed instead of calling for a go around on an unstabilized approach (when our visual approach criteria had just changed) tell me that he would have ignored my go-around call and continued the landing. Yup "original Pinnacle".
I am not kidding when I say that the old 9E culture was cowboy. It is refreshing to have standard CAs (XJ/9L) at the helm.
I think it's funny to get laughed at by a 9E CA when I call "airspeed" when he is 15+ knots over assigned speed or Vref and I get a hearty laugh and "are you serious??"
I had one guy who I debriefed instead of calling for a go around on an unstabilized approach (when our visual approach criteria had just changed) tell me that he would have ignored my go-around call and continued the landing. Yup "original Pinnacle".
#186
The guys Delta hired out of XJ were on a large number of pilot's no fly lists here. How do you account for this? I'm not talking about pre-merger NWA guys here, I'm talking about guys who went through the Delta hiring process from XJ only. Now that they are at DAL perhaps they have changed, but when they were here at XJ, they weren't well liked.
Yes there is a difference, one where personality was checked by a three panel Delta team and one where there was not. Again it doesn't mean its a perfect process but this is where airlines filter, at their best, the personalities they prefer.
Before anyone has a tizzy, I have no problem with the flow at all but there is a massive difference between making it through the entire Delta hiring process and flowing over. I'm not condemning one or the other, they are just apples and oranges.
Also I know many of the flows and most were good pilots and nice to fly with. There has been only a couple I wish never would have come over. That's the case everywhere though. Most of the past flows are great guys IMO.
#187
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 273
All of the FO's that I have flown with are great guys with great pilot skills. I do agree sharing of the info is a little hard for them but each one I have worked with is at least trying to share. When they work with an ex XJ guy they have to share when they work with a legacy pinnacle pilot I am sure the captain is not sharing info so it's back to the old way. I guess if I was in charge I would put something in writing either we are going to share or we are not. But we can't have such a wishy washy procedure it just doesn't make good CRM.
#188
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,938
Think ur a bit out of touch with reality. It was voted on to keep their job not for some agreement that may or may not work for a bunch of people IF they even want to go to delta. Many didn't want to start over in the right seat at another regional. I know I'm not willing to. We now keep our jobs until we get hired where we want.
#189
:-)
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Ok lets clear my understanding. Maybe I am splitting hairs here,"the guys that went through the hiring process"......two ways, premerger DELTA, pilots went through the entire interview process in its totallity from XJ and were hired by Delta. The flows had no testing, interview or psych exam to fail, just a checklist of extreme items were covered like felonies, no degree....but there was no "hiring process" So you say the guys Delta had no choice in the matter to take "flows" were the jerks? or " the pilots that went through the hiring process that Delta?
Yes there is a difference, one where personality was checked by a three panel Delta team and one where there was not. Again it doesn't mean its a perfect process but this is where airlines filter, at their best, the personalities they prefer.
Before anyone has a tizzy, I have no problem with the flow at all but there is a massive difference between making it through the entire Delta hiring process and flowing over. I'm not condemning one or the other, they are just apples and oranges.
Also I know many of the flows and most were good pilots and nice to fly with. There has been only a couple I wish never would have come over. That's the case everywhere though. Most of the past flows are great guys IMO.
Yes there is a difference, one where personality was checked by a three panel Delta team and one where there was not. Again it doesn't mean its a perfect process but this is where airlines filter, at their best, the personalities they prefer.
Before anyone has a tizzy, I have no problem with the flow at all but there is a massive difference between making it through the entire Delta hiring process and flowing over. I'm not condemning one or the other, they are just apples and oranges.
Also I know many of the flows and most were good pilots and nice to fly with. There has been only a couple I wish never would have come over. That's the case everywhere though. Most of the past flows are great guys IMO.
#190
There is no other regional in my future. Call it selfish call it whatever but I won't be there for any long term industry pain at the regional level.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post