Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
GED = Good Enough for Delta >

GED = Good Enough for Delta

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

GED = Good Enough for Delta

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-2013, 04:44 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,919
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit
give it a rest copilot....if delta wants to hire a damn fine pilot....it is their choice..they own the place....i am a capt at alaska and dont even have ged.....the worst pilots I have flown with are the und wannabees....the best are just pilots....give it a rest punk.....
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Thank you for furthering my point.
Originally Posted by Sluggo_63
It looks like you also don't have a shift key or an apostrophe key.
Originally Posted by NERD
Coffee through nose burns
+2 Coffee through nose
DeadHead is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 04:56 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 737 Left
Posts: 828
Default

When I was at Colgan almost everyone had a degree. Why are we acting like everyone from Pinnacle won't have a degree? My guess is less than 10% don't have a degree.
DMEarc is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 04:57 AM
  #43  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Default

Originally Posted by Klsytakesit
give it a rest copilot....if delta wants to hire a damn fine pilot....it is their choice..they own the place....i am a capt at alaska and dont even have ged.....the worst pilots I have flown with are the und wannabees....the best are just pilots....give it a rest punk.....
I take it you didn't pass middle school either.
Red Forman is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 04:58 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 900
Default

I also don't think a 4 year degree makes or breaks a pilot. However, it's listed as a requirement for the job, so that makes it, well, required. If they want to waive it for 9E guys, then they should remove it as a requirement for everyone.

It's there as a "weed out" to reduce the total number of applicantions, much like SWA's 737 type rating. It's not that hard to get a 4 year degree in this day and age. You can get one in underwater basketweaving on-line. It doesn't HAVE to be aviation. I heard plenty of senior MEM guys grumbling about how they'd never get their dream job at FedEx because they didn't have a degree. When I would suggest actually getting the degree so they might get said dream job, you'd think I slapped them in the face. I didn't have a 4 year when I was hired at 9E. I had one by the 4th year I was there, though. Why? Opens up more options when it comes time to leave.

To me, ASSUMING this is even true, this is purely a way to get guys to vote "yes" on the TA that might otherwise not do so. Like was pointed out above, it's possible that people without a degree might be passed over for an actual job for "more qualified applicants." However, I'm a firm believer that if you don't meet the minimum qualifications for a job, you probably shouldn't be interviewed. I don't see this as any different than someone complaining because they didn't get interviewed because they only had 1500 hours instead of 3000 when 3000 was the published minimum to apply,
Kellwolf is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 04:58 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
SilverandSore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: CA
Posts: 483
Default

Wait, I thought Delta only hired 'the best'? </sarcasm>
SilverandSore is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:27 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
FedElta's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Retired, again...
Posts: 608
Default

Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
Quoted for awesomeness.
Uh, to vs too ?? all for it, but skipped it ?
FedElta is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 05:27 AM
  #47  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
Default

Couple of points:

First, these pilots you are discussing are already "Delta Pilots." Our union has permitted Delta management to outsource some of our flying. These pilots are flying Delta passengers in airplanes operationally controlled by Delta Air Lines.

Second, they should have seniority numbers. Delta Air Lines is acquiring their carrier. They are an alter ego for Delta pilots. They negotiate directly with Delta management.

Third, Delta Air Lines is doing this to lower costs. Delta would like to bring the Delta pilots down to the new, lower, standard. Delta management thinks this will be cheaper (and it always is until someone crashes a jet and kills a lot of people ... a tragic, but repeatable fact pattern ) Every pilot in Delta service needs to maintain focus, not allowing these created crises to distract us from our work.

The Delta pilots have a union which has failed to even object to the Pinnacle pilots making an end run around the Delta pilots' representational autonomy. This union has facilitated outsourcing. To continue to "benefit" from outsourcing this union is compromising the future of Delta pilots.

The Delta pilots should watch Pinnacle closely. Outsourcing is the union equivalent of trading altitude for airspeed. If bankruptcy was a full stall; we have now regained flying speed. Our pay is coming back, but we are steadily losing our altitude in the form of decreasing representational power. Even with billion dollar profits we failed to achieve our contractual goals.

Please understand this Pinnacle Bridge for what it is ... an attempt to restart the race to the bottom by whipsawing the regional pilot groups. What will make this next round worse is that Pinnacle now sits at the table with Delta management and enjoys equal access with the Delta MEC. As such, we can expect Delta management to try to whipsaw the Delta pilots too.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-15-2013 at 05:38 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 06:00 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Posts: 119
Default

Great, so you've made your manifesto Bucking Bar what are you gonna do about it?
xjcrew1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 06:04 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 788
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Couple of points:

First, these pilots you are discussing are already "Delta Pilots." Our union has permitted Delta management to outsource some of our flying. These pilots are flying Delta passengers in airplanes operationally controlled by Delta Air Lines.

Second, they should have seniority numbers. Delta Air Lines is acquiring their carrier. They are an alter ego for Delta pilots. They negotiate directly with Delta management.

Third, Delta Air Lines is doing this to lower costs. Delta would like to bring the Delta pilots down to the new, lower, standard. Delta management thinks this will be cheaper (and it always is until someone crashes a jet and kills a lot of people ... a tragic, but repeatable fact pattern ) Every pilot in Delta service needs to maintain focus, not allowing these created crises to distract us from our work.

The Delta pilots have a union which has failed to even object to the Pinnacle pilots making an end run around the Delta pilots' representational autonomy. This union has facilitated outsourcing. To continue to "benefit" from outsourcing this union is compromising the future of Delta pilots.

The Delta pilots should watch Pinnacle closely. Outsourcing is the union equivalent of trading altitude for airspeed. If bankruptcy was a full stall; we have now regained flying speed. Our pay is coming back, but we are steadily losing our altitude in the form of decreasing representational power. Even with billion dollar profits we failed to achieve our contractual goals.

Please understand this Pinnacle Bridge for what it is ... an attempt to restart the race to the bottom by whipsawing the regional pilot groups. What will make this next round worse is that Pinnacle now sits at the table with Delta management and enjoys equal access with the Delta MEC. As such, we can expect Delta management to try to whipsaw the Delta pilots too.
A great post. While I don't think we are "alter-ego" your point is taken.
SmitteyB is offline  
Old 01-15-2013, 06:15 AM
  #50  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2012
Posts: 404
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
The CPZ deal doesn't bother me as much as that was a deal negotiated pre-merger and they had a NW overseen interview process.

I was fine with the 9E deal up until this point, but now there's a side letter to the side letter. Very few good things can come from this other than some of the worst pilots you've ever seen getting an undue and streamlined chance at a job far above where they should have peaked.

Please provide "deets" on why they are so bad?
MEMbrain is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flysooner9
Hangar Talk
2
09-14-2011 07:37 PM
jungle
Money Talk
1
04-21-2011 09:56 PM
StormChaser
Major
378
08-10-2009 12:25 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
10
01-15-2007 08:59 PM
CALPilotToo
Cargo
25
11-26-2006 10:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices