GED = Good Enough for Delta
#151
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
#152
I don't accept your premise. I don't let my family fly on DCI carriers. Ever. Even if it means driving or taking the train.
I know I'm not the only one who feels that way. There are a lot of great pilots at DCI carriers, I understand. Conversely, there are a considerable number of unsafe pilots. Why take the chance?
I know I'm not the only one who feels that way. There are a lot of great pilots at DCI carriers, I understand. Conversely, there are a considerable number of unsafe pilots. Why take the chance?
#153
#154
No kidding... However that being said, when I used to work for 9E, I would check the crew names on flights my family members were going to be riding on. If it happened to be certain pilots, I'd have them take another flight!
The sad thing is that was a fairly common practice...
The sad thing is that was a fairly common practice...
#156
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 12,037
#157
I don't really keep in touch with anyone there on a regular basis anymore. But if it is, it would seem that actual contract language contradicts this "vault letter," and contractual language would take precedent. If the actual legal document requires them to meet normal Delta hiring minimums, then I fail to see how a "secret letter" is going to do anything.
#158
I don't really keep in touch with anyone there on a regular basis anymore. But if it is, it would seem that actual contract language contradicts this "vault letter," and contractual language would take precedent. If the actual legal document requires them to meet normal Delta hiring minimums, then I fail to see how a "secret letter" is going to do anything.
I hope you're right.
#159
I don't really keep in touch with anyone there on a regular basis anymore. But if it is, it would seem that actual contract language contradicts this "vault letter," and contractual language would take precedent. If the actual legal document requires them to meet normal Delta hiring minimums, then I fail to see how a "secret letter" is going to do anything.
What is your opinion on the allegation of admin manual sidestepping?
Do you see this agreement as a strategic victory or gross strategic blunder...or are you waiting to see what DALPA does with it before you answer?
#160
What is your opinion on the allegation of admin manual sidestepping?
Do you see this agreement as a strategic victory or gross strategic blunder...or are you waiting to see what DALPA does with it before you answer?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post