Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
HR Discrimination and Such >

HR Discrimination and Such

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

HR Discrimination and Such

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2012, 04:07 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Default

Originally Posted by Planespotta
The clear solution to this problem is forming the White Male Pilot's Association (WMPA) so our grievances can be heard throughout the industry!
No no, based on the other thread, you should SUE THEM first!
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 04:12 PM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 55
Default

Better to spend energy on bettering yourself and networking rather than whining about minorities and woman getting interview calls. For your pleasure, I spent 13 years at 2 regionals and a 135 carrier before I 'got the call'. My phone was dead silent in '07 and '08 when Delta/United/UPS/FedEx and whoever else were hiring. And yes I was well above the mins. Oh yeah, I'm a minority so I should have been a shoe in, right?
In my interview class at fedex there were two females. Neither made the cut. I don't think it's a 'gimme' for anybody anymore.
stkshkr is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 04:32 PM
  #63  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,107
Default

Originally Posted by HSLD
As for tribal affiliation; Contact the tribe and ask what the procedure is for obtaining a CIB card (Certificate of Indian Blood). Once you hold a CIB card, you can apply to become a member of the tribe. Until you've completed both steps it would be foolish to make the claim of Indian heritage on an employment application.
Paul, I might disagree with the last. If you can document that you do in fact have some Indian blood, I think it would be OK to make the claim.

If they specifically ask if you are a registered member of a tribe, answer truthfully. A tribal member might be "more disadvantaged" and thus more deserving of consideration than a non-tribal member, but they can't totally discount your heritage. There are a variety of contentious sub-divisions within the Native American population...they don't even all agree on tribal definitions, and it's become a high dollar issue with all the casinos and derivative revenue.

I'm also certain they can't fire you for claiming heritage that you can prove just because you're not a tribal member. It depends on how they ask the question...if they ask about heritage, tell them how you feel. If they ask about tribal status, obviously you need to be honest.

At some point it would become ludicrous to claim minority status. I'm not quite sure where you draw the line....1/16? 1/32?
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 04:48 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Airhoss's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Sleeping in the black swan’s nest.
Posts: 5,725
Default

My disagreement is based on my recollection of United's hiring practices back in the late eighties/early nineties.
WP,

And of course that was the time period that UAL lost the big EEOC law suit and was under a court order to increase minority numbers. I am fairly certain that this conversation is in regards to current practices.
Airhoss is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 04:52 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I was a co-op (intern) in the Training Department.
Yea and I am sure the UPS employment department asked you about everyone hired. Being qualified and being the most qualified are not the same thing.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 05:25 PM
  #66  
Thuggin it out
 
Salukipilot4590's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Rollin' Down tha 405
Posts: 2,567
Default

Well...I'm in this thread now....watching all of you guys get mad.

So...

I have to ask...

Why U mad tho?
Salukipilot4590 is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 05:44 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Position: Cap'n
Posts: 687
Default

There is no "discrimination"..... like many have said on here, classes are 98% white guys at legacies. That sure shows no proof of this so called discrimination claim. I was told this a long time ago, and it is great advice.... "stay in your lane".

Life is much easier that way.

But in this case, it really does not matter as the claim is false in the first place.

Just look around the airport the next time at mainline pilots.
workingforfree is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 05:52 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
HIFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 777 Captain in Training
Posts: 1,457
Default

Originally Posted by workingforfree
There is no "discrimination"..... like many have said on here, classes are 98% white guys at legacies. That sure shows no proof of this so called discrimination claim. I was told this a long time ago, and it is great advice.... "stay in your lane".

Life is much easier that way.

But in this case, it really does not matter as the claim is false in the first place.

Just look around the airport the next time at mainline pilots.
Simply not the case applicants are weighed and a disproportionate score is given if you can check the minority box.
HIFLYR is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 06:07 PM
  #69  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesNoBrakes's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Position: Volleyball Player
Posts: 4,024
Default

It sounds like a bunch of angry white guys from the 70s and 80s that haven't moved on. If these airlines were really doing this, they'd be leaving themselves open for a massive lawsuit. I've interviewed with a few companies over the last few years and I can't say there's any of this going on. The HR departments are usually professional and it's in the company's best interest to not be doing it like that.
JamesNoBrakes is offline  
Old 12-31-2012, 06:09 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777

At some point it would become ludicrous to claim minority status. I'm not quite sure where you draw the line....1/16? 1/32?
When it comes to Tribal Court, you must have 1/8 to qualify as Indian.

Yes, there's a good story as to how I gained that knowledge.
gatorhater is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices