Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
PNCL TA: YES to FURLOUGH, or NO BURN IT DOWN? >

PNCL TA: YES to FURLOUGH, or NO BURN IT DOWN?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines
View Poll Results: How will you vote on the PNCL TA?
YES, PAYCUTS, DOWNGRADES AND FURLOUGH 1,500 PILOTS PLEASE
31
16.23%
NO, BURN IT TO THE GROUND.
160
83.77%
Voters: 191. You may not vote on this poll

PNCL TA: YES to FURLOUGH, or NO BURN IT DOWN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-18-2012, 07:28 PM
  #1  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: CRJ - Hell Hole
Posts: 236
Default PNCL TA: YES to FURLOUGH, or NO BURN IT DOWN?

2,310 pilots vote.

405 get to keep their job
405 get demoted to first officer
1,500 lose their job

........if it passes.


Vote yes to furloughs, or no and burn it down?
Pinchanickled is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:32 PM
  #2  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

It won't be as bad as you think.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:32 PM
  #3  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

Originally Posted by Pinchanickled
2,300 pilots vote.

405 get to keep their job
405 get demoted to first officer
1,500 lose their job

........if it passes.


Vote yes to furloughs, or no and burn it down?
Wait for the language to come out. I'm not saying I endorse it or don't. If it's not good, vote it down. If its surprisingly good, vote in favor. Once the language comes out, I have a feeling the boards will carry a firm mindset or a hearty debate. From the get-go its hard to be upbeat about losing 100 airframes and half the list. In the end it does come down to your thread title, so I give you that.
higney85 is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:33 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 788
Default

Our union reps are volunteers. This is as much their job as it is ours. We deserve them the respect to reserve judgement until their hard work is displayed to us in full language. These are our brothers.
SmitteyB is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:39 PM
  #5  
Line Holder
 
CoATP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: CRJ 200, CRJ900 CA
Posts: 95
Default

95 pre-merger 9E pilots move from their temporary home in the 200 back to the 900. 16 900's leave before the new ones come back. Some will "ratio" over but most will go to 200. Once both Xj and 9E are up to ratio, senior Colgan guys will move over to make up 405 total. In the mean time FO's are shuttling back and forth between 200 and 900 [and from turboprops (actually ass sitting now)] 200 FO's hit the bricks. Training cost go even further up the wazoo. Don't count on those 40 until they are on the ramp and the door closes on the first flight.

Alternative is a "wind down." Year or 18 months for the "vultures" to grab the flying. In the mean time most of the above happens anyway. A "yes" vote will entitile Delta to beat everyone else about the head and shoulders during their section 6 rates and in the meantime reimburse ALL DCI's less because the average is now lower. A "NO" vote sacrifices PNCL pilots for the "common good." Nice choice.
CoATP is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:45 PM
  #6  
Rollin'
 
MatchPoint's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: AA Airbus
Posts: 829
Default

You forgot "Other.”
MatchPoint is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:47 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

What do you mean read the TA? It's a concessionary contract. Pinnalce's current pay is not that much different than Skywest or ExpressJet. Why would you believe you're overpaid? If you're even entertaining this TA, you believe you should do this job for less than what you are getting paid? That's what this TA is about. Getting you to do your job for less than what you make now, in pay/QOL. If I ever faced a vote to take a paycut, my vote is automatically no. I don't need details. Let the judge force it. Comair took 3 voluntarily voted paycuts, and 1 offer in a last-ditch efford but they still couldn't stop the inevitable.

If this TA is signed, it will set the new benchmark off which XJT, Skywest, Eagle, Republic, and all other regional airlines will then go off from.

Good luck to you all, but to the 1400 who are going to be jobless anyway, why give up one penny? The end result is the same for these 1400. Might as well take full pay to the last day.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:49 PM
  #8  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
What do you mean read the TA? It's a concessionary contract. Pinnalce's current pay is not that much different than Skywest or ExpressJet. Why would you believe you're overpaid? If you're even entertaining this TA, you believe you should do this job for less than what you are getting paid? That's what this TA is about. Getting you to do your job for less than what you make now, in pay/QOL. If I ever faced a vote to take a paycut, my vote is automatically no. I don't need details. Let the judge force it. Comair took 3 voluntarily voted paycuts, and 1 offer in a last-ditch efford but they still couldn't stop the inevitable.

If this TA is signed, it will set the new benchmark off which XJT, Skywest, Eagle, Republic, and all other regional airlines will then go off from.

Good luck to you all, but to the 1400 who are going to be jobless anyway, why give up one penny? The end result is the same for these 1400. Might as well take full pay to the last day.
Aren't you undercutting the legacies by working at Virgin America????
Mesabah is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:53 PM
  #9  
Rollin'
 
MatchPoint's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: AA Airbus
Posts: 829
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Aren't you undercutting the legacies by working at Virgin America????
. ...... nice!
MatchPoint is offline  
Old 12-18-2012, 07:53 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah
Aren't you undercutting the legacies by working at Virgin America????
All legacies make more than VX, except US Air pilots who made numb decisions to get stuck under LOA 93. When VX started, the legacies were already all in post-bankruptcy era contracts when management set VX rates. That was the landscape the industry was in, post 9/11, high oil and a recession. Today, all those legacies have improved their pay into a much better position than the post 9/11 contracts, and much better than VX. VX didn't hinder UAL, CAL, nor Delta. All these airlines scored new pilot pay withotu any hindrance from VX. US Air is the only one, but they have their own internal issues that caused their current LOA 93 predicament.
ShyGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
frotter
Atlas/Polar
20
02-06-2013 12:39 PM
L'il J.Seinfeld
Cargo
72
11-01-2011 02:55 PM
Gunter
Cargo
19
01-11-2009 08:29 PM
Capt TedStriker
Cargo
76
01-05-2009 02:07 PM
steamgauge
Cargo
200
12-18-2008 06:25 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices