Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article) >

Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2012, 08:44 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by N2Core
Agreed. It's not like there was a major hiring wave in the past 10 years or so. Only a little movement. Where were they gonna go? There hasn't been enough movement to clean out even close to all the senior pilots flying for regionals. It's mainlines ultimate goal to transfer all mainline flying to regional flying for the most part, slowly but surely. Some would'be chose to stay anyway had there been any substanscial movement. A pilot, no matter regional or mainline, should ever be punished for being "too experienced." Even going to mainline is not a safe bet.
This. and what Imapilot said. It's almost like many junior guys feel that going to a major is like going to college, where you apply every year and they take hundreds of thousands of applicants. Not all of us had perfect timing, were able to get on with less than 1000 hours from 04-08, upgrade in 2 years when we had the time and get out the door at a good hiring cycle. Little things like massive 9/11 furloughs and schedule cuts, recessions and oil prices and mismanagement got in our way. Tell me, how many mainline pilots were hired since 2001 vs how many regional, military and 91 guys have applied? I know this falls on deaf ears of the ones that should read this, because it's like arguing politics. They have made up their mind and don't want to listen.
mooney is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 08:51 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Nope the top of a regional airline seniority list collects substandard pilots over time. Say a class of 10 newhires is hired and the best 9 of them are able to move on to something better, only the bottom 1 remains. That bottom 1 continues to move up the list as the "best 9" from other newhire classes also leaves. Over time these "bottom 1"s who can't move on to anywhere better end up collecting at the top. This results in the bottom of the list having roughly 10% substandard pilots and the top of the list heading towards 100% substandard pilots.

This is where the term "lifer" comes from.
There were 10 in my new hire class. 1 moved on and got furloughed immediately. 1 is an eternal FO. The other 8 are still here. Got caught in that cycle. I know that since we have been here so long that means you are a better stick than us, have better social skills and more education, less DUI's and busted check rides, and will have Fred Smith meet you at the jetbridge the second you hit 1000 TPIC with his hand outstretched welcoming you to Purple....

And now, to rub salt in the wound, high times/experience that just a few years ago and were considered "competitive" PIC times or ratings etc well above the mins are being thrown out the window so now there are even MORE pilots to compete against these days.
mooney is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 10:42 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Saabs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Airbus button pusher
Posts: 2,448
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I guess that's why DAL is parking hundreds of RJs, & taking deliveries of 100 B737's & 88 B717's. Not to mention going from 16 MD90's to 58 MD90's. All while reducing the amount of regional flying.
Don't forget adding more 70 seat jets that delta pilots won't even fly. Gode I hope united doesn't cave in....
Saabs is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:06 AM
  #84  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
Nope the top of a regional airline seniority list collects substandard pilots over time. Say a class of 10 newhires is hired and the best 9 of them are able to move on to something better, only the bottom 1 remains. That bottom 1 continues to move up the list as the "best 9" from other newhire classes also leaves. Over time these "bottom 1"s who can't move on to anywhere better end up collecting at the top. This results in the bottom of the list having roughly 10% substandard pilots and the top of the list heading towards 100% substandard pilots.

This is where the term "lifer" comes from.
This couldn't have been put any better. Perfect!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:07 AM
  #85  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by vtx531
Apprentice FO pay, journeyman FO pay, apprentice CA pay, journeyman CA pay. Based on weight. National seniority list.

There - fixed.
Well, dang. I'm glad you solved it. Nicely done!
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:10 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I guess that's why DAL is parking hundreds of RJs, & taking deliveries of 100 B737's & 88 B717's. Not to mention going from 16 MD90's to 58 MD90's. All while reducing the amount of regional flying.
Sure Delta is parking 50 seaters, but they are adding BIGGER jets to replace them. What happens next when the larger RJ's aren't profitable anymore? Will you allow the regionals to fly DC-9's, or 717's. No insult to you, but that TA was more or less a joke. Why, on this planet, would DAL want you to fly a 767 for whatever you make, when in the future a pilot half your age will fly it for less than half of what you're making? It is the future of our business. Maybe farther away than we might think, but it is coming.
N2Core is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:14 AM
  #87  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by N2Core
Sure Delta is parking 50 seaters, but they are adding BIGGER jets to replace them. What happens next when the larger RJ's aren't profitable anymore? Will you allow the regionals to fly DC-9's, or 717's. No insult to you, but that TA was more or less a joke. Why, on this planet, would DAL want you to fly a 767 for whatever you make, when in the future a pilot half your age will fly it for less than half of what you're making? It is the future of our business. Maybe farther away than we might think, but it is coming.

No offense taken, & none intended with this response. You haven't presented facts as I have. Your claim is that management wants to outsource all domestic flying. I presented facts to prove otherwise. Delta has yet to order a single additional 76 seat jet. Perhaps you should ask a Comair pilot just how much of a "joke" the contract is. What you're presenting, is your assumption and opinion.

Last edited by johnso29; 10-04-2012 at 11:35 AM.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:14 AM
  #88  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
There were 10 in my new hire class. 1 moved on and got furloughed immediately. 1 is an eternal FO. The other 8 are still here. Got caught in that cycle. I know that since we have been here so long that means you are a better stick than us, have better social skills and more education, less DUI's and busted check rides, and will have Fred Smith meet you at the jetbridge the second you hit 1000 TPIC with his hand outstretched welcoming you to Purple....

And now, to rub salt in the wound, high times/experience that just a few years ago and were considered "competitive" PIC times or ratings etc well above the mins are being thrown out the window so now there are even MORE pilots to compete against these days.
That's a high concentration of dummies in your newhire class, if that's the case.

There were 15 in my new hire class... 8 years later there are only 4 left. 3 of them are idiots. 1 is a great guy and got hired when he was 50... no reason to attempt to move on in his case.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:15 AM
  #89  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
Don't forget adding more 70 seat jets that delta pilots won't even fly. Gode I hope united doesn't cave in....
Delta has yet to order a single additional 76 seat jet. The ink has been dry for over 3 months. They have however inked the deal on 88 B717's and more MD90's that will take us to 58 MD90's. A recent SEC filing shows the mainline fleet increasing to 793 airplanes. We are currently at 720.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 10-04-2012, 11:16 AM
  #90  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by N2Core
Sure Delta is parking 50 seaters, but they are adding BIGGER jets to replace them. What happens next when the larger RJ's aren't profitable anymore? Will you allow the regionals to fly DC-9's, or 717's. No insult to you, but that TA was more or less a joke. Why, on this planet, would DAL want you to fly a 767 for whatever you make, when in the future a pilot half your age will fly it for less than half of what you're making? It is the future of our business. Maybe farther away than we might think, but it is coming.
This TA cut thousands of seats out of outsourced carriers. Most indications point toward Pinnacle not existing anymore within a couple years.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
Airsupport
Regional
71
07-14-2008 12:14 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
0
06-11-2008 12:21 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices