Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article) >

Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle Reveals Tenuous Nature ... (Article)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2012, 08:27 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Red97Vette's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: UniCal 737 FO
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by Fly782
Hmm XJT does not have that great of pay and last I checked has a metric ton of 50 seaters. Have fun when United announces their new scope, dont think you guys are ssssssspecialer than anyone else.
Who has better pay and work rules? Also, incase you are blind, everyone has a lot of 50's (other than tiny compass or gojetsssss).
Those old 50's will get swapped to 70/90s and the fleet will be reduced. That's happening everywhere. At least we are not flying at a loss just to get in the door.
Red97Vette is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:39 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by Fly782
Hmm XJT does not have that great of pay and last I checked has a metric ton of 50 seaters. Have fun when United announces their new scope, dont think you guys are ssssssspecialer than anyone else.
XJT pay sux. However, it sux less than many. There is no excuse for bragging about or having pride in do someone else's lost flying. That shows a complete lack of class. Rest assured that if XJT does any PNCL flying, Delta will pay for it. I highly doubt that XJT will do it for less. The only people that stand a chance of loosing money is management here.

The same goes for Eagle flying. Skywest INC is just as expensive if not more than the Eagle group is. Pay scales and contracts are pretty close. So again it can only be management taking the loss.

In the case of the Eagle flying it appears as if AMR wanted to expand to other regional carriers at the cost of Eagle but will be giving more American flying to Eagle. So Eagle doesn't appear to be losing any flying. Just some major reshuffling which is an inconvenience and a loss to some having to relocate.

This is a completely different scenario than before when MESA and Gojetz were screwing everyone.

I'm sorry to all of the Pinnacle people affected by this. I truly feel for you.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 08:53 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: AN124 FE
Posts: 1,226
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
Who has better pay and work rules? Also, incase you are blind, everyone has a lot of 50's (other than tiny compass or gojetsssss).
Those old 50's will get swapped to 70/90s and the fleet will be reduced. That's happening everywhere. At least we are not flying at a loss just to get in the door.
You are correct everyone has 50s but the fact is you may end up being in the unemployment line with the 9E guys you keep talking down to, just for a different reason. I was talking to a good friend recently, he was much happier with Pinnacolaba's contract and pay ( obviously going away but it was better than XJT). XJT is not the greatest place on earth, your guys' day will come.
Fly782 is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:22 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice
Unemployment DOES NOT lay 60% of your old pay. It varies state by state.

60%? Not even close
When I got laid off in the sham bankruptcy of 06 I was getting about 90% on unemployment, when factoring in no longer having commuting costs and not eating on the road, I was better off unemployed. Now granted that wouldn't be the case today with current captain pay but with the coming downgrade and if the company gets the full 1113, yes I would rather be back on unemployment than working as an FO under those conditions.
My vote will be NO to any concessions.
Avroman is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 10:29 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
When I got laid off in the sham bankruptcy of 06 I was getting about 90% on unemployment, when factoring in no longer having commuting costs and not eating on the road, was better off unemployed. Now granted that wouldn't be the case today with current captain pay but with the coming downgrade and if the company gets the full 1113, yes I would rather be back on unemployment than working as an FO under those conditions.
My vote will be NO to any concessions.
unfortunately I don't think we will get a chance to vote on anything.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:05 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Red97Vette's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: UniCal 737 FO
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by Fly782
You are correct everyone has 50s but the fact is you may end up being in the unemployment line with the 9E guys you keep talking down to, just for a different reason. I was talking to a good friend recently, he was much happier with Pinnacolaba's contract and pay ( obviously going away but it was better than XJT). XJT is not the greatest place on earth, your guys' day will come.
I'm not talking down to them. I'm saying that I hope they don't get the term sheet imposed on them. I'd it does it will drag everyone down.
Red97Vette is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 11:38 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MunkyButtr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by Red97Vette
I'm not talking down to them. I'm saying that I hope they don't get the term sheet imposed on them. I'd it does it will drag everyone down.
I doubt an 1113 imposition will hurt anyone besides 9E pilots. When was the last time an 1113 was used in negotiations? Mediators aren't stupid. If mgmt gets everything it wants this company won't last through '13. Most of the pilots at 9E are providers for their families. In most cases the only provider. I have faith that our guys will do what is needed to provide for their families. That will be near impossible for the bottom half of the list with this 1113. If staying at 9E works for them they will stay, unfortunately I think a lot of guys won't have a choice.
MunkyButtr is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 01:12 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Posts: 339
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
XJT pay sux. However, it sux less than many. There is no excuse for bragging about or having pride in do someone else's lost flying. That shows a complete lack of class. Rest assured that if XJT does any PNCL flying, Delta will pay for it. I highly doubt that XJT will do it for less. The only people that stand a chance of loosing money is management here.

The same goes for Eagle flying. Skywest INC is just as expensive if not more than the Eagle group is. Pay scales and contracts are pretty close. So again it can only be management taking the loss.

In the case of the Eagle flying it appears as if AMR wanted to expand to other regional carriers at the cost of Eagle but will be giving more American flying to Eagle. So Eagle doesn't appear to be losing any flying. Just some major reshuffling which is an inconvenience and a loss to some having to relocate.

This is a completely different scenario than before when MESA and Gojetz were screwing everyone.

I'm sorry to all of the Pinnacle people affected by this. I truly feel for you.
So you are happy taking American flying though.
dc10guy is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 01:24 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Regardless of the bickering, it is a crappy situation to be in. Good luck to Pinnacle pilots, and hopefully they will land flying opportunities at other companies.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 09-30-2012, 03:41 PM
  #50  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
XJT pay sux. However, it sux less than many. There is no excuse for bragging about or having pride in do someone else's lost flying. That shows a complete lack of class. Rest assured that if XJT does any PNCL flying, Delta will pay for it. I highly doubt that XJT will do it for less. The only people that stand a chance of loosing money is management here.

The same goes for Eagle flying. Skywest INC is just as expensive if not more than the Eagle group is. Pay scales and contracts are pretty close. So again it can only be management taking the loss.

In the case of the Eagle flying it appears as if AMR wanted to expand to other regional carriers at the cost of Eagle but will be giving more American flying to Eagle. So Eagle doesn't appear to be losing any flying. Just some major reshuffling which is an inconvenience and a loss to some having to relocate.

This is a completely different scenario than before when MESA and Gojetz were screwing everyone.

I'm sorry to all of the Pinnacle people affected by this. I truly feel for you.
So you are happy taking American flying though.
Ahhh, the age old question.

Can Mainline flying actually be "taken"
or was it simply "given?"
The Juice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Regional
89
09-15-2013 07:22 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
Airsupport
Regional
71
07-14-2008 12:14 PM
vagabond
Pilot Health
0
06-11-2008 12:21 PM
Sr. Barco
Major
34
07-31-2007 01:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices