Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Eagle TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-10-2012, 12:24 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flysooner9's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,723
Default

Originally Posted by jumpseat2024
I read some PBS propaganda down in the crew room not too long ago..hidden in the fine print it said PBS cuts staffing needs by something like 10%...so IF we keep all the flying we currently have, that's like what..300 more furloughs?

I understand how PBS is more efficient financially, but it's not too great for those of us in the bottom 10-15%
Your forgetting people are and will be leaving left and right.
flysooner9 is offline  
Old 08-10-2012, 01:49 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,238
Default

Originally Posted by rickt86
They lease almost all the airplanes anyway. Like the entire EMJ fleet we have now to my knowledge are all on long term leases, thats at least what the union claimed as fact.
Does'nt make much of a diff. Still have to have capital and solid credit to lease planes...
amcnd is offline  
Old 08-10-2012, 06:04 PM
  #53  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by jumpseat2024
I read some PBS propaganda down in the crew room not too long ago..hidden in the fine print it said PBS cuts staffing needs by something like 10%...so IF we keep all the flying we currently have, that's like what..300 more furloughs?

I understand how PBS is more efficient financially, but it's not too great for those of us in the bottom 10-15%
Originally Posted by flysooner9
Your forgetting people are and will be leaving left and right.
Not to mention that we are seriously short on staffing right now, so PBS might just allow them to operate normally with current staffing levels instead of furloughs. Also, how are they going to handle a few hundred pilots leaving the line to go to the schoolhouse for new airplanes?
tmtbiker is offline  
Old 08-10-2012, 08:30 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Default

Originally Posted by amcnd
Does'nt make much of a diff. Still have to have capital and solid credit to lease planes...
not sure where you work, but AMR has a much much much better chance to get a huge aircraft order, even with all the ones they now have on order, when compared to a stand alone RJ airline.
lakehouse is offline  
Old 08-11-2012, 10:18 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 4,603
Default

Signing a contract based on people leaving... That worked well before right?

To add I copied this from the discussion on the apa no vote:

Congrats to the APA pilots who voted no. Had we voted no 8-10 years ago at USAIR, UAL (me), and DAL, the industry would probably not have descended into the death spiral that it has become.

I voted no every time at UAL. If we had torpedoed UAL 9 years ago, I would probably now be a 9 year FO or Captain at another major airline in the US, making far more money than I would be as a Captain at UAL right now. Unfortunately all the ALPA represented pilots caved in to the 1113 threats that our companies used, and these threats were backed up by the ALPA cronies.

It is my belief (also worth 2 cents) that you guys finally did the right thing. I only wish we had the same cajones 9 years ago.

Section 1113 of the bankruptcy code was put into the US bankruptcy code in 1983 to PROTECT the interests of union laborers in court. It is not a threat, it is there to protect you and your interests. By voting no, you are allowing the law to be followed. I wish we had done the same. In the end, after two "voluntary" pay cuts and then voluntarily giving up our pensions, we ended up far below the companies original term sheet.

LEEDX:
I agree with most of what you said except that the judge will go by the term sheet. The judge is required by 1113 to look at the haircut that he imposed on other creditors, and make sure that if he abrogates the union contract, that it is in line with those cuts. Are there any recent precedents with pilots in recent bankruptcy proceedings? Unfortunately no. None of the rest of us in the industry had the cajones to stay in the game, and see the other guys cards, We folded.

Well done to you, the pilots at American, and good luck.
Qotsaautopilot is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 03:42 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

AE management has not dealt or asked for reductions from any creditor.
AE management is trying to impose the concessionary contract that the MEC passed in 2011 when we still had 2.5 years to go on current contract.
The AE ALPA MEC was in secret negotiations with AE management without the pilot group being aware.
The AE MEC held a Chicago rigged recall process by having the meeting 22 miles away from base and paid for there friends for passes and dinner at the baseball game. This recall meeting was held over memorial weekend so the MEC could keep the CHICAGO reps in office because they are in the MEC's back pocket.
The Pilots of AE should VOTE NO because of all the hidden side deals already agreed to by the MEC and Negotiation Committee, such as if, PBS is not agreed to in one year, every pilot will take a 7% pay cut.
The ALPA MEC at AE is in the back pocket of the management as is half the LEC's. ALPA National in managements back pocket is a given here at AE.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 08-12-2012, 06:32 PM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

copied from another forum thread

IT IS THE TA OF SUMMER 2011.
As far as I am concerned, all they did recently in negotiations was let the company get everything it wants and the MEC hide it from us in the way they present the 1113 compromise language. Another scam as the scope scam.

We have already have had numerous understanding of the first 1113/AIP be revised with the second updated 1113/AIP which is even worse than the first posting of the AIP by CUJO (ALPA Supplied).

When will this pilot group wake up and realize the MEC/NC and the LEC Team Tony LOSERS are lying to the pilots or at least misrepresenting the facts or omitting items from the pilots to know.

VOTE NO
TAKE IT TO THE JUDGE
TEAM TONY---RESIGN NOW
buddies8 is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 04:13 PM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 894
Default

Originally Posted by B767
You're wrong. Captains aren't getting a pay cut. You reading the same term sheet?
NO, you're wrong.

Read it again. We are all taking a pay cut if this turd gets passed.
  • Min 1.5% IAI raise gone for 2 years (3% cut)
  • Per diem cut (.10/hr)
  • Deadhead pay cut to 50%
  • PBS = HUGE pay cuts we can't even see yet with loss of transitions/conflicts etc..

These may seem small but they add up to THOUSANDS of dollars per year. Call it what you want, it may not be a "rate" cut, but it's still a pay cut in my book when I don't get the money in my checks anymore.

Lost time off with this crap PTO bank

If PBS is not implemented within one year we owe the company 8 Million. 7% pay cut (Dave Ryter- Conference call)

The second PBS is implemented it will reduce our staffing needs by approx 12% according to PBS vendors.. so goodbye higher paid junior Captains, back to the right seat. PAY CUT.. Junior FO's on the street possibly..
RyanP is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 04:29 PM
  #59  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 562
Default

Pbs is horrible. Only people that think its good are asa pilots. But there brain washed so they don't count. The dh pay sucks, but it will really suck on the lax to ord. Or lax to ny, and vice versa
samballs is offline  
Old 08-13-2012, 07:40 PM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: forever fo
Posts: 2,413
Default

they seem to already be over staffing the NYC bases, I guess they are getting ready for both furloughs and deadheading them from JFK to DFW LAX to do flying with cheap deadheads.
lakehouse is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
orvil
American
304
12-06-2011 10:32 AM
bgmann
Regional
31
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
Noleone
Regional
7
09-21-2007 07:24 AM
FDX aviator
Cargo
2
08-09-2007 11:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices