Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle Mangement Bankruptcy Proposal >

Pinnacle Mangement Bankruptcy Proposal

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle Mangement Bankruptcy Proposal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2012, 08:57 AM
  #81  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

For those with loans, there is always this:

Military College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP)
It can cover up to $65,000 of loans. If I am not mistaken, one could keep his seniority number while enlisted, and (at least when I was in) getting a flight billet was easier for an active duty member than a guy off the street.



(no, I'm not being snotty. Money saved and the GI bill paid for my flight training)
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 09:08 AM
  #82  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Threads like this are why I pushed very hard in my graduation exit interview that Purdue make a personal finance class mandatory for AvTech/Flight majors.

A library card and "Total Money Makeover" would do folks a lot of good...
Good idea.

Funny thing is lately one of the title loan companies has been advertizing that it is paying for high school kids to take a personal finance class.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 11:26 AM
  #83  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: 757/767
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by vtx531
-management option to cap all pilot line awards at 75 hours
Somebody help me out with this one. Does this mean you would only get paid for 75 hours but might have to fly more? Or that they wouldn't build lines above 75 hours? Seems like that would ultimately require more pilots to make that work (for a given number of flight hours).

What am I missing?
N53 W030 is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 12:28 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Back in school.
Posts: 580
Default

The reason for that clause is the simple fact that part of the agreement between Delta and Pinnacle states that Delta will have the ability to change our total block hours from month to month. Capping the lines to 75 means that either a) there will be a while lot of reserves on a given month out b) there will be no reserves for that given month... Since our guarantee its 75 hours why would the company want some people to have the ability to break guarantee when they can almost do away with pilots going over guarantee... Does that make sense? Typing on my phone doesn't help my thought process...
belliott is offline  
Old 05-10-2012, 12:58 PM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by belliott
The reason for that clause is the simple fact that part of the agreement between Delta and Pinnacle states that Delta will have the ability to change our total block hours from month to month. Capping the lines to 75 means that either a) there will be a while lot of reserves on a given month out b) there will be no reserves for that given month... Since our guarantee its 75 hours why would the company want some people to have the ability to break guarantee when they can almost do away with pilots going over guarantee... Does that make sense? Typing on my phone doesn't help my thought process...
Yeah since Delta has lots more summer flying for us generally I think we will all see 90 hour lines in the summer and 75 hour lines in the winter. If we didn't have such drastic change in block hours season to season I would think it would be cheaper to furlough more and have everyone fly 90 hours (gotta leave a pad for JM/Ext)
mooney is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 07:41 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Finally......... some common sense:

V. Implementation of Integrated Seniority List.

A. The Carrier Parties shall not implement the Integrated Seniority List prior to operational integration.

B. No employee of any Carrier may claim an entitlement to seniority rights of any type under the integrated Seniority List, or to compensation or other benefits in lieu of such seniority rights, prior to Operational Integration.
Sounds an AWFUL lot like, furlough out of seniority order to stop the training madness.
Avroman is offline  
Old 05-11-2012, 09:05 AM
  #87  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Sounds an AWFUL lot like, furlough out of seniority order to stop the training madness.
Uhh, no. That portion is for future potential mergers. What's it saying is that we need to prevent movement across certificates before we even have an operational integration.

For our 3-way merger, what SHOULD have happened is that even after the ISL, no one should have been able to jump across to another airline for a period of two years. Give it time to getting the airlines integrated first.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 11:49 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

2 questions to discuss about the term sheet: one obviously is why is there pay rates (pathetic) in there for 86 seat and 115000 lb planes and second, why is there a q 400 rate still listed?
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 07:06 AM
  #89  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 156
Default

I'm with whoever said:

They got rid of all the money-losing operations.

We are making money on -200s and XJ-900's... so why do we need any paycuts or concessions?

I mean, I can see if we kept all that other flying then it makes sense for them to ask for paycuts (still rediculous though) but now why?
vtx531 is offline  
Old 05-13-2012, 07:58 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 320
Posts: 709
Default

Originally Posted by vtx531
I'm with whoever said:

They got rid of all the money-losing operations.

We are making money on -200s and XJ-900's... so why do we need any paycuts or concessions?

I mean, I can see if we kept all that other flying then it makes sense for them to ask for paycuts (still rediculous though) but now why?
Because now they can make more money. You can not keep giving 40%+ to management if we do not take a pay cut.
tom14cat14 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
stbloc
Regional
13
05-01-2008 04:47 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-14-2005 09:52 PM
geshields
Major
0
09-14-2005 02:00 PM
Sir James
Major
0
09-06-2005 11:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices