Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle Dispute Resolution Letter >

Pinnacle Dispute Resolution Letter

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle Dispute Resolution Letter

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2012, 06:49 PM
  #31  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Default

Originally Posted by Rama04
I remember there was a way to block people on the old airlinkpilots.com
Is there something like that on here? The juice's antagonistic remarks are childish & annoying.
Thanks for the help
Better than that.... Now Airlinkpilots.com has a feature called
THE THUNDERDOME where guys get to fight it out in their own section of the message board. It's truly good stuff. Same for Mesabapilots.com
thebiscuit is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:07 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I see. What you are saying makes sense now.



Slap at unity? There has been no unity from day 1 of the 3-way negotiations. Any hint of unity broke initially last April when Mesaba filed a dispute AFTER hearings were closed regarding the 9E DOH issue. THat didn't go well. Then the quotas came out and it reflected horrendous staffing numbers on the Pinnacle side from the old June 2010 staffing model, and then the 9E guys were downgraded so Mesaba and Colgan pilots could take left seats. That didn't bring any unity. And NOW that entire fleets are getting parked, it's every group for itself fighting to protect as many seats as they can for their own group. Face reality: there is no unity to be had ever since this three-way happened.


Ha! Good luck with that. Now that the livelihood of senior 9E pilots is affected, watch a 200% effort from the 9E side of things. Before, there wasn't really any clarification or fight when the junior side got screwed in unfair quota numbers and the Saab fence. I never heard a peep since the Aug 2011 update that the clarification is requsted from Bloch and he hasn't answered. That was also in regards to the Saab captain fence-off for Pinnacle pilots. How much you wanna bet, in cold cash, that THIS time, in regards to THIS issue with the CRJ-900 quotas, you WILL hear a clarification from Bloch?

The Pinnacle NMFC has been working hard to reduce that effect. I have never seen anywhere close to the failure rate that has been happening to the former XJ/9L's When the fail rate is over a third, something systemically is wrong.
Avroman is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:14 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 444
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
The Pinnacle NMFC has been working hard to reduce that effect. I have never seen anywhere close to the failure rate that has been happening to the former XJ/9L's When the fail rate is over a third, something systemically is wrong.
Speaks volumes about the training department. I thought things would have changed in the last year down there.

AQP starts soon right?
B00sted is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:21 PM
  #34  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 3
Default

Not sure you are going to like AQP
Boom is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:28 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 444
Default

Originally Posted by Boom
Not sure you are going to like AQP
why not?
..............
B00sted is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:30 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
The Pinnacle NMFC has been working hard to reduce that effect. I have never seen anywhere close to the failure rate that has been happening to the former XJ/9L's When the fail rate is over a third, something systemically is wrong.
Grow up...they aren't out to get you. Not their fault you can't fly a missed approach with a failed FMS (or just go straight out anyways just for the hell of it) or leave the flaps at 20 after a v1 cut and not even bringing them up on the climb check. Plus the fail rate is around 10%. where are you getting this 33%? Inflammatory crew room and internet gossip? Sure it might inflate to 30% for a class or two but it is nowhere near 33% overall. I suppose the Feds are in on this too since so many have not been signed off on their first or second fed rides?

Last edited by IBPilot; 05-12-2012 at 07:50 PM.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:32 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by B00sted
Speaks volumes about the training department. I thought things would have changed in the last year down there.

AQP starts soon right?
What does it say? that they want people who are capable of safely flying the CRJ with your family on board? You sound like one of those guys who turned the screen red on 3 v1 cuts and claimed he failed because he was 2 lidos behind and didn't have his shoulder harnesses on...and what's AQP got to do with anything ? you are still at the mercy of one of those 9e instructors "out to get you" with a pink slip.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:35 PM
  #38  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 3
Default

One of the often overlooked aspects of AQP is no extra training...... Only repeats allowed, no extra training, go to checkride whether student ready or not.....This is based on validating the training curriculum as well as the student
Boom is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 07:42 PM
  #39  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 3
Default

It can work well but it won't solve problems inherent in the department
Boom is offline  
Old 05-12-2012, 09:21 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
The Pinnacle NMFC has been working hard to reduce that effect. I have never seen anywhere close to the failure rate that has been happening to the former XJ/9L's When the fail rate is over a third, something systemically is wrong.
What's NMFC?
ShyGuy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vtx531
Regional
26
07-03-2012 08:30 AM
The Juice
Regional
300
04-05-2012 04:26 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
11
12-21-2010 03:58 PM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
love2fly
Regional
19
12-10-2005 07:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices