Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
PNCL Out of seniority Furloughs >

PNCL Out of seniority Furloughs

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

PNCL Out of seniority Furloughs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-06-2012, 08:22 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

Guys and lady, consider this...

Daddy Delta knew this was coming. What did Pinnacle ask from United? I am guessing they asked for payments out of the norm because Daddy Delta postured Menke for that. Delta, does not want more of its feeders also working for the competitors ie United. Knowing United would deny the comp, Pinnacle would be forced into BK thus breaking the contract with United and ensuring DIP financing. Now Delta runs the show and I see in the not so distant future Daddy D parking some 50 seaters as well...

Now you look at the Q operation, I would think it would benefit the carrier that gets them to take the crew that's already qualified on them. Think about it... If the Q crews follow the airframes that saves Pinnacle the training costs and provides qualified current crew to a new carrier. Its a win/win for both parties and makes sense, not that Menke is a sensible person, he hasn't proved it yet.
United loves the Q. The heads at United are former Continental heads who wanted the Q400. Theres another United operator taking the Qs, we're just waiting for the official announcement... What do you guys and lady think?
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 08:52 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetBlast77's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 661
Default

Originally Posted by Luv2Rotate
Guys and lady, consider this...

Daddy Delta knew this was coming. What did Pinnacle ask from United? I am guessing they asked for payments out of the norm because Daddy Delta postured Menke for that. Delta, does not want more of its feeders also working for the competitors ie United. Knowing United would deny the comp, Pinnacle would be forced into BK thus breaking the contract with United and ensuring DIP financing. Now Delta runs the show and I see in the not so distant future Daddy D parking some 50 seaters as well...

Now you look at the Q operation, I would think it would benefit the carrier that gets them to take the crew that's already qualified on them. Think about it... If the Q crews follow the airframes that saves Pinnacle the training costs and provides qualified current crew to a new carrier. Its a win/win for both parties and makes sense, not that Menke is a sensible person, he hasn't proved it yet.
United loves the Q. The heads at United are former Continental heads who wanted the Q400. Theres another United operator taking the Qs, we're just waiting for the official announcement... What do you guys and lady think?

Everything you said is false. United wants the Q airframes gone. They loved the Q when they were at CAL because of scope, now that the merger is complete they can slide the 70 seat jets wherever they want. As far as pinnacles 50 seaters, Delta just extended the CPA on the 200s till 2022. Check your facts.
JetBlast77 is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:02 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by JetBlast77
Everything you said is false. United wants the Q airframes gone. They loved the Q when they were at CAL because of scope, now that the merger is complete they can slide the 70 seat jets wherever they want. As far as pinnacles 50 seaters, Delta just extended the CPA on the 200s till 2022. Check your facts.
With loopholes big enough to fly one through, if they want to get out early. They will not be keeping all 140 at Pinnacle til 2022.
Avroman is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:10 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Technically, the 9E Merger Committee (in their infinite stupidity), proposed basically only stapling Colgan, not Mesaba. An acquaintance who was on the XJ merger committee (ST), said if 9E had agreed to DOH it would have been that way (as 2/3 of the proposals being the same). Neither here nor there in either case, everyone got a little bit hosed. (Th<ough my personal fav is being told that "the XJ merger committed f*d you because we could").... I'm not even kidding...
Infinite stupidity is an understatement. It is clear and obvious beyond any doubt that the real goal of at least 2/3 people on the 9E merger committee was to protect the top of the 9E list. Had it not been like that, there would have been NO valid reason to not accept DOH. From the 9E standpoint, what would have been wrong with DOH? The only thing that would have hurt is the top end of the list, were our guys would have been screwed because Mesaba was much more top heavy. But in the end, the CRJ-900 category was realized, and not only was it almost a 3:1 ratio, it started with Mesaba pilots first. LOL. So the senior side still lost, and then all 9E guys got screwed.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:17 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captain152's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,258
Default

^^^^Um, yeah, basically. M'kay (in the ladies man voice)
captain152 is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:36 AM
  #56  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
With loopholes big enough to fly one through, if they want to get out early. They will not be keeping all 140 at Pinnacle til 2022.
Yep... they extended the contract until 2022, if Delta wants to keep them until 2022. They can back out any airplanes that they want with the wording of the ASA.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:37 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
With loopholes big enough to fly one through, if they want to get out early. They will not be keeping all 140 at Pinnacle til 2022.
What are the loopholes? Im not calling you out i just am sick of fear being spread all around with out any facts behind it? What does the new ASA with Delta say that allows them to park 200's?
Fact - the saabs are leaving
Fact - the q 400's are leaving
FAct - The 900's with PQ tail numbers are leaving
Fact - We have an ASA with Delta for 140 200's and 41 900's until 2022.

Speculation - Delta could take more planes away, trade them, or give us more
PinnacleFO is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:37 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Senior Skipper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: the correct seat
Posts: 1,422
Default

To those of you wanting to furlough out of seniority to avoid training costs...

What if the company announced the entry of a new, more desirable aircraft type, and all slots would be filled by new hires, because training costs would be reduced. How would you feel about that?

The sword cuts both ways, and you are what you are advocating would set a VERY dangerous precedent.
Senior Skipper is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 09:57 AM
  #59  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by PinnacleFO
What are the loopholes? Im not calling you out i just am sick of fear being spread all around with out any facts behind it? What does the new ASA with Delta say that allows them to park 200's?
Fact - the saabs are leaving
Fact - the q 400's are leaving
FAct - The 900's with PQ tail numbers are leaving
Fact - We have an ASA with Delta for 140 200's and 41 900's until 2022.

Speculation - Delta could take more planes away, trade them, or give us more
Look at the wording of the ASA on the 140 200's... Pinnacle is the new 200 "accumulator" (like Comair has been). If Delta wants to park those 200s, they can at any time now with the new ASA.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 04-06-2012, 10:11 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PinnacleFO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
Default

where is that asa?
PinnacleFO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ferd149
Mergers and Acquisitions
117
11-08-2023 07:41 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
Superpilot92
Major
142
07-26-2009 09:53 AM
CurtissRobin
Cargo
7
03-18-2009 11:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices