1000 FPM Descent?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 116
If a LCA says it’s required I want to be able to at least see a reference in writing. Most of the time there is no reason to even have a shallow descent. Or by doing a shallow descent it would cause problems with ATC crossing traffic. But, if it’s not breaking any FAR/SOP or ops spec etc. Then it’s a preference not a requirement.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: RJ Captain
Posts: 1,181
The AIM use to have the 1000fpm minimum descent rate in it. I think it's been gone for a while now though.
I hardly see anyone use less than a 1000fpm, and when they do they usually get asked by ATC for more.
I hardly see anyone use less than a 1000fpm, and when they do they usually get asked by ATC for more.
#23
There's nothing wrong with asking a LCA (check airman) where something is written in the book. If they can't reference it in the book they shouldn't be teaching it and critiquing you on it. They're there to help form you into a better pilot... NOT to pick on every little thing you do TECHNIQUE wise that's different from them.
Bottom line... If its safe and within limitations and procedures of the AIM and company manuals... Who gives a darn?!
Bottom line... If its safe and within limitations and procedures of the AIM and company manuals... Who gives a darn?!
#24
The AIM says: Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft to 1000 ft above or below the assigned altitude, and then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between 500 and 1500 fpm until the assigned altitude is reached. If at anytime the pilot is unable to climb or descend at a rate of at least 500 fpm advise ATC. I have heard of pilots being given a hard time from check airmen on IOE for initiating a slow descent at less than 1000 fpm. I'm just looking for anyone who has the written reference on where is says to descend at 1000 fpm or greater. Thanks for the help
#25
You'll find the Captains that like to micro-manage. It's not worth the hassle.
To answer the question, it all depends on the situation. If they tell me the next sector needs me to adjust my crz level by 1000ft, i may just select 500fpm. If they say to descend for traffic, I'm more likely to select 1500fpm or greater.
I like to avoid being that guy making the controller's job harder, so I'll just ask ATC if I'm ever seriously in doubt. If they ask what your vertical speed is, and you're only doing 600fpm, I'd take it as an indication that you need to do better, unless they state otherwise.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Position: Citation X
Posts: 159
Not as often as you might think.
We cruise at FL450, and sometimes 200-300nm from destination ATC tries to descend us down into the upper 20s/low 30s...into high fuel flows and often the strongest headwinds.
Not wanting to waste fuel and time, if I can't talk them into PD I'll descend at 500fpm until 1. they ask for a greater rate, 2. I intercept my VNAV profile (3.0-4.5°), or 3. I get turned out. Staying as high as possible, as long as possible, allows us to keep high true airspeeds with low fuel burns.
Typically, the conversation then goes like this:
"Say rate of descent"
"500fpm, but we can do whatever ya need"
Sometimes it doesn't work for ATC for us to stay up, but most of the time it does...all it takes is asking the question.
We cruise at FL450, and sometimes 200-300nm from destination ATC tries to descend us down into the upper 20s/low 30s...into high fuel flows and often the strongest headwinds.
Not wanting to waste fuel and time, if I can't talk them into PD I'll descend at 500fpm until 1. they ask for a greater rate, 2. I intercept my VNAV profile (3.0-4.5°), or 3. I get turned out. Staying as high as possible, as long as possible, allows us to keep high true airspeeds with low fuel burns.
Typically, the conversation then goes like this:
"Say rate of descent"
"500fpm, but we can do whatever ya need"
Sometimes it doesn't work for ATC for us to stay up, but most of the time it does...all it takes is asking the question.
If not on profile, make it 500' a min until they ask for more. ATC makes mistakes too so dont be afraid to query them if you need or want to stay high or CANT make a restriction. Bottom line fly your aircraft, dont let atc take the controls.
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: L Side
Posts: 409
The AIM says: Descend or climb at an optimum rate consistent with the operating characteristics of the aircraft to 1000 ft above or below the assigned altitude, and then attempt to descend or climb at a rate of between 500 and 1500 fpm until the assigned altitude is reached. If at anytime the pilot is unable to climb or descend at a rate of at least 500 fpm advise ATC. I have heard of pilots being given a hard time from check airmen on IOE for initiating a slow descent at less than 1000 fpm. I'm just looking for anyone who has the written reference on where is says to descend at 1000 fpm or greater. Thanks for the help
I think it's great that you brought this up. Have you noticed that there's been no reference so far to say otherwise? I think LCA have a tremendous responsibility and that they should differentiate clearly between regs and their technique.
IMO, the 1,000 fpm has been passed from generation to generation and though it can be considered good operating technique in some circumstances, I've never seen it be the general rule in writing anywhere around the world that I've flown.
There are times that a min descent rate (500 fpm) is good operating technique. Sitting in an A340 at FL410 and approaching some FIR boundaries that are known bottlenecks, it is not uncommon to lose you preferred cruising altitude for another. Why rush down with a thrust-idle descent? I've been at FL410 and been asked to descend to FL350 due spacing (separation is procedural in many parts of the world- even with radar) and I did a 500 fpm descent. That may save 200 lbs. Extrapolate 200 lbs per sector over a fleet and see how much that adds up.
It's good that you questioned this. I'd recommend that you find a way to ask these guys who say stuff like this where to find the reference that makes it seem that you are trying to learn and not challenging their authority.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: L Side
Posts: 409
I haven't read it in while, but IIRC, this is correct. It's no more than 1000 fpm up or down as you approach your assigned altitude. As stated earlier, its intent is to reduce/avoid TCAS incidents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aircanada_addict
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-09-2006 12:44 PM