Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan (Pinnacle) 15 more Qs? >

Colgan (Pinnacle) 15 more Qs?

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan (Pinnacle) 15 more Qs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2012, 12:44 PM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Position: AN124 FE
Posts: 1,226
Default

Please enlighten us on how someone constantly complaining about not getting an upgrade and then applying to Gojet to get it isnt a case of SJS. O and going to 9E expecting that same 1 year upgrade you bash Colgan for. You have your head so far up your a$$ and out of touch with reality it is not even funny.

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Absolutely not! This post REEKS of SJS. You must be a young punk pilot in his 20s who upgraded on the Q in 1 year, and now disappointed that a mainline carrier hasn't hired you. You CAN do something. Go picket when mainline pilots have events. Support their cause! I really think mainline guys are done giving up scope, and should not fall for those stupid carrots anymore. Those 900s should be flown at the legacy airline level. For Pete's sake, Air Canada has got it right! They gave out the 700s/900s to Air Canada Jazz but every single EMB-170/175/190 is at mainline Air Canada. In fact, the entry-level position at Air Canada is on the Embraer 170/175. That's how it should have been here. Instead, we have Republic the world's largest operator of "E-Jets"


You know what? I actually hope we at 9E lose all the Qs and the CRJ-900s. I hope mainline takes that flying back! Do you realize that Delta pilots have a published payrate for the bigger RJs? Regionals should never have expanded beyond the 50 seat market, but now that it has, I look forward to it getting cut back. Take the greater than 70 seaters back to mainline, and let the regionals operate the 50 seaters or less. Then as time continues and the 50 seaters become less efficient, right-size the regionals by having them park a portion of the 50-seater fleet. After 9/11 we had a huge disproportionate amount of growth in 50 seater RJs. It's time to take that back. Regionals should shrink, some should disappear altogether, and the bigger RJs should be operated by mainline. Sure AA will have to operate the 900, but it should be AA pilots that do it! Only those pilots willing to whhore themselves out (like you) say something stupid like you would be ticked off if your regional didn't bid for that flying. If that's how you truly feel, then you don't get it!
Fly782 is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 12:57 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PerpetualFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 495
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
Really? People at Colgan upgraded onto the q in one year?

Dude ur a moron
Seriously, how many times am I gonna have to use this over stupid crap that you say, Shy?

PerpetualFlyer is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:02 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by Saabs
Really? People at Colgan upgraded onto the q in one year?

Dude ur a moron
Of everything I posted, that's what you grabbed onto? Sorry, I should say 1 year on Saab and maybe 2 to 2.5 on the Q (count from when they first came in 2007). OOoooo big deal. You SJS-hooked regional sell out!

Please enlighten us on how someone constantly complaining about not getting an upgrade and then applying to Gojet to get it isnt a case of SJS. O and going to 9E expecting that same 1 year upgrade you bash Colgan for. You have your head so far up your a$$ and out of touch with reality it is not even funny.
I considered applying to GoJet, but in the end, never sent the application. It seemed too fishy for me to send something to a gmail address. My upgrade hopes are dead. Now, I'm revised on my attitude. I realize that any upgrades will now go to these Colgan pilots hired in 2010 for the Saabs and 2008 and 2009 for the Qs. These Colgan pilots will continue bidding to the RJs, and do their best to stay under the Q quota. A 2007 9E FO will therefore not upgrade for the foreseeable future. So that having been said, why should I hope for upgrades? Why would I want to see guys hired after me get upgraded and move onto legacies while us 2007 DOH guys get left behind? Screw it dude, I give up. Now I don't care about Pinnacle or what happens here. I think we deserve whatever we have coming. Let them park the CRJ900s, Saabs, and Qs. I'd actually love to hear some beotching by a 3 or 4-year Colgan guy in regards to losing his left seat. Many of you rode the gravy train long enough. It's time for mainline to take back the flying! I have about 1,150 pilots below me on the list, so even if we park the Saabs, Qs, and the ATL 900s, I will still be what I am now, a FO. Park the fleet, gentlemen! I will not take a 7% paycut to preserve Colgan's hopes and dreams.
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:10 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MunkyButtr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Absolutely not! This post REEKS of SJS. You must be a young punk pilot in his 20s who upgraded on the Q in 1 year, and now disappointed that a mainline carrier hasn't hired you. You CAN do something. Go picket when mainline pilots have events. Support their cause! I really think mainline guys are done giving up scope, and should not fall for those stupid carrots anymore. Those 900s should be flown at the legacy airline level. For Pete's sake, Air Canada has got it right! They gave out the 700s/900s to Air Canada Jazz but every single EMB-170/175/190 is at mainline Air Canada. In fact, the entry-level position at Air Canada is on the Embraer 170/175. That's how it should have been here. Instead, we have Republic the world's largest operator of "E-Jets"


You know what? I actually hope we at 9E lose all the Qs and the CRJ-900s. I hope mainline takes that flying back! Do you realize that Delta pilots have a published payrate for the bigger RJs? Regionals should never have expanded beyond the 50 seat market, but now that it has, I look forward to it getting cut back. Take the greater than 70 seaters back to mainline, and let the regionals operate the 50 seaters or less. Then as time continues and the 50 seaters become less efficient, right-size the regionals by having them park a portion of the 50-seater fleet. After 9/11 we had a huge disproportionate amount of growth in 50 seater RJs. It's time to take that back. Regionals should shrink, some should disappear altogether, and the bigger RJs should be operated by mainline. Sure AA will have to operate the 900, but it should be AA pilots that do it! Only those pilots willing to whhore themselves out (like you) say something stupid like you would be ticked off if your regional didn't bid for that flying. If that's how you truly feel, then you don't get it!
I know who you are ShyGuy. I'll make sure to introduce myself the next time I see you around Detroit. I'll let you decide if I'm some "young PUNK pilot" as you so kindly put. Get over yourself. Who runs the 900 for Air Canada and what are they flying now? Its happening and in your current position there is nothing you can do about it. The RLA guarantees that. You cry and whine all over these boards yet you don't even volunteer in the union. You want things to change then volunteer to make your change instead of your entertaining tantrums on a web board. If we park the Q's and the 900's then you would be back on reserve sitting pretty in the crew room and some other REGIONAL would be flying them. Last time I checked a 900 and a 175 have the same seats, so once again your argument is flawed. Not to mention your attempt at GoJet and an early upgrade here at 9E. You can still get your upgrade at GoJet so why don't you do us all a favor and bow out. No one respects your opinion on these boards so quit wasting your time.
MunkyButtr is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:20 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
I know who you are ShyGuy. I'll make sure to introduce myself the next time I see you around Detroit. I'll let you decide if I'm some "young PUNK pilot" as you so kindly put. Get over yourself. Who runs the 900 for Air Canada and what are they flying now? Its happening and in your current position there is nothing you can do about it. The RLA guarantees that. You cry and whine all over these boards yet you don't even volunteer in the union. You want things to change then volunteer to make your change instead of your entertaining tantrums on a web board. If we park the Q's and the 900's then you would be back on reserve sitting pretty in the crew room and some other REGIONAL would be flying them. Last time I checked a 900 and a 175 have the same seats, so once again your argument is flawed. Not to mention your attempt at GoJet and an early upgrade here at 9E. You can still get your upgrade at GoJet so why don't you do us all a favor and bow out. No one respects your opinion on these boards so quit wasting your time.
Oh I volunteered once but the good ol' boys club kept me out. And if we park the Qs, Saabs, and ATL 900s, I'm still high enough on the list to not be on reserve. Remember, half your Colgan group did well on the SLI, the other half did not. The quotas help you, but those will be meaningless once those fleets are parked. The Colgan pilots can displace out 9E guys but only up to a certain point, 541 must be 9E Captains on the -200.

As for Air Canada, only a very limited amount of CRJ700s/900s are operated by Jazz. The entire Embraer fleet is operated at the mainline level at Air Canada. You see in Canada, they don't suffer from regional pilot sell-outs who crave to fly bigger RJs. They realize their careers lie at the major-level, and do their best to ensure they protect the flying. I know a couple Jazz pilots, and not one of them wanted the EMB-170/175/190s at their airline! They all wanted that aircraft to go to mainline Air Canada. Unlike you, preaching that you want your airline to bid on bigger RJ flying!
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:27 PM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MunkyButtr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Oh I volunteered once but the good ol' boys club kept me out. And if we park the Qs, Saabs, and ATL 900s, I'm still high enough on the list to not be on reserve. Remember, half your Colgan group did well on the SLI, the other half did not. The quotas help you, but those will be meaningless once those fleets are parked. The Colgan pilots can displace out 9E guys but only up to a certain point, 541 must be 9E Captains on the -200.
I don't fly for Colgan, ShyGuy. I am senior to you at your own airline. You are so far out of touch with what is happening it is comical.
MunkyButtr is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:29 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
MunkyButtr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 687
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Oh I volunteered once but the good ol' boys club kept me out. And if we park the Qs, Saabs, and ATL 900s, I'm still high enough on the list to not be on reserve. Remember, half your Colgan group did well on the SLI, the other half did not. The quotas help you, but those will be meaningless once those fleets are parked. The Colgan pilots can displace out 9E guys but only up to a certain point, 541 must be 9E Captains on the -200.

As for Air Canada, only a very limited amount of CRJ700s/900s are operated by Jazz. The entire Embraer fleet is operated at the mainline level at Air Canada. You see in Canada, they don't suffer from regional pilot sell-outs who crave to fly bigger RJs. They realize their careers lie at the major-level, and do their best to ensure they protect the flying. I know a couple Jazz pilots, and not one of them wanted the EMB-170/175/190s at their airline! They all wanted that aircraft to go to mainline Air Canada. Unlike you, preaching that you want your airline to bid on bigger RJ flying!
Shy, listen to me, the 900 and the 175 are the SAME plane. What is different about Jazz flying the 900 and mainline flying the 175? SAME AMOUNT OF SEATS.
MunkyButtr is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:33 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,920
Default

Originally Posted by MunkyButtr
Shy, listen to me, the 900 and the 175 are the SAME plane. What is different about Jazz flying the 900 and mainline flying the 175? SAME AMOUNT OF SEATS.
But the line has to be drawn somewhere. Air Canada pilots were able to limit the numbers of 700s/900s at Jazz, and were able to fight and win the EMB bigger RJs to be at the mainline level. The fact you defend the topic by saying they are the same size shows me you still don't get it. A line needs to be drawn somewhere, and the Canadians did it perfectly. I can't even count how many 700s, 900s, E170s, 175s, 190s in the US are operated by the regionals. Oh wait yes I can, all of them!
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:54 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
etflies's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: KCCO
Posts: 767
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
But the line has to be drawn somewhere. Air Canada pilots were able to limit the numbers of 700s/900s at Jazz, and were able to fight and win the EMB bigger RJs to be at the mainline level. The fact you defend the topic by saying they are the same size shows me you still don't get it. A line needs to be drawn somewhere, and the Canadians did it perfectly. I can't even count how many 700s, 900s, E170s, 175s, 190s in the US are operated by the regionals. Oh wait yes I can, all of them!
US Airways flies 190s. Since when were they a regional?

Last edited by etflies; 02-04-2012 at 02:10 PM.
etflies is offline  
Old 02-04-2012, 01:56 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sinsilvia666's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 673
Default

q upgrades were at a minimum 3.5 - 4 years, not 2, they were in fact the longest upgrades that cjc ever had. not ****ing on the scope word but continental express flew the atr-72, thats one more seat then we have now so....traditionally i guess it could be a express plane, but would agree it would be nice to see it mainline, esp operating between citys like nyc/dc/bos, traditional shuttle runs for legacy's.
sinsilvia666 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DeltaPaySoon
Regional
488
05-09-2011 10:14 AM
FlyJSH
Regional
19
08-11-2010 03:29 PM
whtever
Regional
109
12-15-2008 09:12 PM
nwa757
Regional
69
03-29-2008 11:24 AM
BeatsCFIing
Regional
7
02-17-2008 08:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices