Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots >

Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-23-2012, 06:11 AM
  #341  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Musical Chairs
Posts: 74
Default

+1 to the above post. The truth is: PNCL is either going or not going into BK. Our 5% has no bearing on this, we must all accept it. If you were management, how much of a difference can a 5% cut to your pilot's already low pay save per flight hour in comparison to all the other associated expenses with running an airline? Little, if any. VOTE NO.
Banja is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 06:15 AM
  #342  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PropDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: In charge of the remote
Posts: 207
Default

Originally Posted by Bzwebner
Been through this before, not been through this before... It doesnt matter.

This is bigger than just "will this prevent bankruptcy at pinnacle". Its a statment to the industry as a whole in my opinion.


/Begin Rant

What are you worth as a pilot?

EVERYONE one working at Pinnacle, or any other regional for that matter, EVERYONE knew that they are entering an industry that is known for extreme ups, and extreme downs. Especially the side of the industry that we are in, the regionals.

No one looking at working at a regional ever said to themselves, "this is forever, I am going to be happy here!".

What happens is that people get cozy with their seniority and dont want to take the pay cut or cut in QOL by moving up to a major like they originally planned.

My point is, we ALL knew what we were getting in to when we signed up for this gig and we all assumed the risks. It is our responsibility to have our own back up plans just in case. Whats the advice we always give to young teens looking to aspire to become pilots? Get a degree in somthing other than aviation, THEN pursue the flying. We cant all be blind to our own advice.

Personally I have a plan B and plan B and a half. Just for situations like this.

In regards to the argument of if we vote no, we lose it all... I disagree.

If we vote yes, we do what pilots before us have done for years. We bow our heads to those who feed our supposed "addiction" to fly.

If we vote yes we bow our heads to those in corporate who are used to the idea of the "Let me fly your jet for free" pilots.

If we vote yes, we are continuing to prostitute, yes prostitute, our hard earned, highly skilled trade out to corporate mis-managment and greed.

As a group of high skilled, well trained, highly capable pilots who take tens of thousands of people from point A to point B safely multiple times a day, WE need to draw a line. because if we dont, we have NO RIGHT to come on to boards like this, go to Nightline, CNN or congress to complain. Because we have been, and would have continued to be the ones to blame.

Our industry treats pilots like dirt because when they shove our face in the sand with pay cuts or say "fly my plane for peanuts", and This is what SM is asking us to do now, those pilots before us said: "yessir, thankyou sir, let me keep flying for poverty wages sir, THANK YOU!"

I for one, say how dare you?
How dare you propose taking 5% away from my salary when I can just barely cover rent for a one bedroom apartment and purchase groceries based on what I make today? Where do you get the audacity to ask that of me? How dare you ask that of me, Sean Menke.

I paid close to $45,000 of my hard earned cash to pay for my flight training. It took me 6 years from my intro flight till I got my first regional job (I did not sell out to the first bidder and chose from three that offered me a job). I am not here to just so I can get my hands on a shiny plane, be it a 900, 200 400, saab or Superjumbostratoliner jet. I am here because its what I enjoy doing, and I do it well. It is my CAREER and deserve to be paid fairly for the level of experience and responsibilty that the position entails.

My 5% did not bring Pinnacle to where it is today. Management oversight did. Redundant positions, poor scheduling technuiqe, lack of proper maintenance and operations like running IAD with 5 Q400s based there with no reserve crews to back it up brought Pinnacle to where it is. And guess what, your 5% is not what got it here either.

Its time to take a stand and set a precedent that I can only hope other regional groups will follow. Look at history, look at how often the pay cuts actually helped and then look at how often then didnt.

What are you worth as a pilot? I can assure you it is more than what our industry standard is today, because people before us, in our position bowed their head and sold themselves out to poor managment decisions.

So look at youself in the mirror and honestly ask yourself:

"What is all of my training, skill and experience worth?"

I know what I am worth.

My vote is no.

/end rant

Disclaimer: Agree with me, or not... I didnt post this to hear you tell me I am wrong or right. I posted this because I feel this issue is bigger than the sum of pinnacle and it has always sicked me that we cant see that our worst enemy in this industry is us.
Well said!
PropDriver is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:19 AM
  #343  
Gets Weekends Off
 
gonyon's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,432
Default

Originally Posted by tennisguru
Question: let's say that somehow the company and the union come to some sort of agreement that provides for 5% in overall savings from the pilot group without cutting wages or increasing insurance costs. Would that still draw such an adamant "no" vote from everyone?
As long as my W2 is not affected, I will more likely be flexible. otherwise its NO for many of the reason bzwebner pointed out.
gonyon is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:36 AM
  #344  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Imapilot2
I understand your sentiments but....are you implying even in the slightest that your pilot pay at any airline was even a sliver of a reason the airline liquidated? Your pay was to high to keep the airline in business and if you would work for cheaper it would still be in business?????
No it wouldn't which is why I voted against the pay cuts. Also because the cuts were so severe that I would not be able to afford to work there (FLY I). Both the pilots and the FAs at Fly I voted the paycuts down and the company liquidated a few months later.

My point is that if this goes to a bankruptcy situation, it is not going to be the walk in the park that some of these no cheerleaders like Shyguy think its going to be. For that reason, I have been pointing out why I think some will vote for the cuts in the end, and why it shouldn't be held against them. Likewise, I understand why many will vote no, and that should not be held against them either. This will be a difficult decision for everyone, and each should vote their conscience (if it comes to that).
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 07:42 AM
  #345  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: Taco Rocket Operator
Posts: 2,485
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
Kat, don't take this as a personal jab.

I have been through this, and as a result of the "education" of Comair going through BK, voting for cuts, and still shrinking, I know exactly how I would vote given this situation. You can spell it with two letters and one of them is N.
Boomer,

I don't take it personally. I understand why you feel the way you do. I was working in CS at Comair before the DL buyout, and left there just after the strike because I could see the handwriting on the wall with DL. Still have lots of friends there, and some days it really makes you angry when you realize how Delta has systematically destroyed what was once a great company and a great place to work.

That being said, I also respect the reasons why some would want to do everything possible to avoid bankruptcy, and give DL even more power to decide Pinnacle's fate.
FlyingKat is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 08:00 AM
  #346  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,916
Default

My point is that if this goes to a bankruptcy situation, it is not going to be the walk in the park that some of these no cheerleaders like Shyguy think its going to be. For that reason, I have been pointing out why I think some will vote for the cuts in the end, and why it shouldn't be held against them. Likewise, I understand why many will vote no, and that should not be held against them either. This will be a difficult decision for everyone, and each should vote their conscience (if it comes to that).
I never said it would be a walk in the park. I'm simply pointing out at historical examples and stating that NEVER in history has a regional airline (or even mainline?) taken a certain select percentage paycut figure and successfully stayed out of bankruptcy. I say again, the 5% WAGE CONCESSION WILL NOT SAVE THIS COMPANY'S FINANCIAL SITUATION. The 5% will NOT fix the loss of money from the Saabs and Qs. The 5% will NOT fix the massive retraining costs. You are an idiot if you think your 5% paycut will ACTUALLY KEEP THIS COMPANY OUT OF BANKRUPTCY! That's why I'm saying VOTE NO!

In every single case I can think of where pilots voted in paycuts to "help" the airline, they all declared bankruptcy a short time later to a few years later, WHILE still operating under those cut wages! LEARN FROM HISTORY!
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 08:56 AM
  #347  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by FlyingKat
To demean anyone as "gutless" or a "coward" for voting yes is as ridiculous as criticizing those who vote no when you consider the implications of this decision.
No, Kat. Nobody is gutless or a coward for voting in the paycuts. Naive? Absolutely. The only "guarantee" at this point according to Menke's memo is that we're going to file chapter 11 if we don't get the concessions from EVERYBODY (inlcuding mainline partners). And if we do vote in the paycuts? Well...he didn't say we won't still file for bankruptcy. Looks like we're filing for ch11 either way. The vote doesn't mean anything...it's symbolic.

By the way, where does all this talk of liquidation and shutting the doors come from? That's just people letting their fear get the better of them...
AxialFlow is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 09:58 AM
  #348  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 939
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
Uh, no. Because for the lifers, they are lifers. No other lifeline left other than Pinnacle corp. The whiners and upgrade chasers will just run to the next crappy operation that has (relatively) quick movement.


Pilots at other regionals don't decide where the flying comes from.

You just know it all don't you? Well Hurry your whiney self up and go to GoJet since you want to be a street CA there so bad. I'll write the LOR for you.
IBPilot is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 10:54 AM
  #349  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: ERJ 170
Posts: 729
Default

Anyone know if it's true the company couldn't pay rent for the Mesaba training HQ in Eagan, MN?
magnus0322 is offline  
Old 01-23-2012, 11:20 AM
  #350  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Posts: 520
Default

u see, thats where they get a quick, easy AND free 5%. the stupid pilot group willingly gives up the 5% then they declare bankruptcy - then they take a resonable ( to the judge) 8-10% him not knowing that u just took 5-- SO>>>>>>> after its all said and done- that 5% u gave now becomes 13-15% game over you lose.

thats why you always say no to a peddly 5%--- 5% is a complete joke in the grand scheme of things-- ur payrates arent what keeps pinnancle out of BK- it's what makes them much more profitable, quicker when coming out-- DUH!
skippy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices