Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots >

Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle asking 7% from pilots

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2011, 02:19 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Precarious
Posts: 387
Default

If the 135 op specs allow part 91 repo flights, the cfi can fly those legs and log it if they are appropriately rated. But, back to the point of this thread, I hope the Pinnacle guys can send a strong HELL NO!!! message and have it stick. It is disgusting that they would even ask you guys to give up more.
conquestdz is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:23 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: MSP CA
Posts: 353
Default

Originally Posted by conquestdz
If the 135 op specs allow part 91 repo flights, the cfi can fly those legs and log it if they are appropriately rated. But, back to the point of this thread, I hope the Pinnacle guys can send a strong HELL NO!!! message and have it stick. It is disgusting that they would even ask you guys to give up more.
If the pilots end up having a say, I would say it would be a 90+% HELL NO!!!!!
CAPTAINPCL is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:34 PM
  #103  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Posts: 19
Default

Dang, if they cut 5% this job won't be worth it anymore. I might even qualify for unemployment again. Flying for the little airlines sucks, they did not tell me this when I paid for all those flying lessons. I'm starting to feel like I can't trust people anymore. Maybe we can sue somebody.
LoopingLear is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:48 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,765
Default

Originally Posted by CzechAirman
Boiler was under the assumption that most 135 operators are on the up and up and actually follow all the regulations.
You can do this garbage and still be legal. It's good to hear that Boiler hasn't had to witness a lot of this BS, though - perhaps it's a regional (not regional in the airline sense) thing. Around here it started in earnest when everything went to hell in 2008. Autopilot-in-leu op spec for a King Air, Pilatus, or single pilot Citation, throw a dude in a pilot uniform in the right seat, list him/her on the manifest as a passenger - and off you go with the pax none the wiser.

It's friggin' unethical garbage, but it's amazing how shady 135 can be. Some of the feds around here don't even care if the monkey in the right seat works the radio, saying that the PTT isn't technically a 'flight control'. The good news is that at least around here, many of the operators still pay a day rate for the guy in the right seat - they're just trying to get around having to pay for the training.
biigD is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:52 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by CzechAirman
Boiler was under the assumption that most 135 operators are on the up and up and actually follow all the regulations. CFIs routinely fly right seat in King Air type a/c and illegally log it.
If your opspecs call for another qualified crew member then you had better be trained to be a qualified crew member or your company is in violation, that said not all 135 operation require a second crew member take Cape Air for instance they operate single pilot as long as their auto pilot is not MELed, are there operators allowing CFIs to ride right seat and log time perhaps but I suppose it was on the 91 repo flight as long as the PIC is an MEI and is giving instruction the right seat time should be logged as DUAL GIVEN I don't think that MOST 135 operators using King Air type a/c would risk the insurance liability.. if you KNOW of some of these operators doing other wise do you want to share if its your belief that that kind of practice is wide spread I would hope you would alert your local FSDO if you think that the operation is shady and possibly a safety problem for the airspace which you operate in. Thoughts....
DD214 is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:53 PM
  #106  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by LoopingLear
Dang, if they cut 5% this job won't be worth it anymore. I might even qualify for unemployment again. Flying for the little airlines sucks, they did not tell me this when I paid for all those flying lessons. I'm starting to feel like I can't trust people anymore. Maybe we can sue somebody.

I know you are being facetious, but with the internet and all the information out there about how the regional airlines pay and treat pilots, it's hard to be sympathetic when they still come despite knowing what they are getting themselves into.
CzechAirman is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:58 PM
  #107  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 139
Default

Originally Posted by CzechAirman
I know you are being facetious, but with the internet and all the information out there about how the regional airlines pay and treat pilots, it's hard to be sympathetic when they still come despite knowing what they are getting themselves into.
So any suggestion on where they should progress. Gone are the days of flight instructing for a few years then fly boxes then a turbo prop beech 1900 then a jet ect ect what suggestion do you have.
DD214 is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 02:58 PM
  #108  
Bracing for Fallacies
 
block30's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: In favor of good things, not in favor of bad things
Posts: 3,543
Default

Originally Posted by DD214
If your opspecs call for another qualified crew member then you had better be trained to be a qualified crew member or your company is in violation, that said not all 135 operation require a second crew member take Cape Air for instance they operate single pilot as long as their auto pilot is not MELed, are there operators allowing CFIs to ride right seat and log time perhaps but I suppose it was on the 91 repo flight as long as the PIC is an MEI and is giving instruction the right seat time should be logged as DUAL GIVEN I don't think that MOST 135 operators using King Air type a/c would risk the insurance liability.. if you KNOW of some of these operators doing other wise do you want to share if its your belief that that kind of practice is wide spread I would hope you would alert your local FSDO if you think that the operation is shady and possibly a safety problem for the airspace which you operate in. Thoughts....
Well...the place my friends know of....well it did catch up to them. I have a feeling this is not an isolated problem unfortunately.
block30 is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 03:38 PM
  #109  
Does NOT get weekends off
 
snippercr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: ERJ - 145
Posts: 1,631
Default

Originally Posted by DD214
So any suggestion on where they should progress. Gone are the days of flight instructing for a few years then fly boxes then a turbo prop beech 1900 then a jet ect ect what suggestion do you have.
The days of 1000 CFI wonders getting hired straight into a jet are long gone!!!!!

Oh wait...
snippercr is offline  
Old 12-20-2011, 03:48 PM
  #110  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr
The days of 1000 CFI wonders getting hired straight into a jet are long gone!!!!!

Oh wait...

The age 65 rule pilot shortage will be starting next year!

Oh wait...
CzechAirman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
DMEarc
Regional
1249
12-17-2010 10:37 PM
skippy
GoJet
14
05-14-2009 11:12 AM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
Maxclimb12
Major
1
03-18-2009 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices