Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Colgan 3407 crash...Chief Pilot Emails >

Colgan 3407 crash...Chief Pilot Emails

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Colgan 3407 crash...Chief Pilot Emails

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-24-2011, 04:24 PM
  #41  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,635
Default

Whenever I feel down I just buy another gun and I miraculously I feel better. Then I go fly the King Air and life is normal again.
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:27 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly IFR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: X
Posts: 343
Default

The aviation industry is all about luck and timing. Some bad people have good luck on checkrides and some good people have bad luck, that is not to say that skill isn't involved. Timing has everything to do with career progression in the airlines. Some will stay at the regionals for life, some will go on to the majors, others won't make it to 121 at all (if thats what was intended) I know people from all of the above categories. Just remember, I'd like to say its all about skill, but it seems to be more about luck and timing.
Fly IFR is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:29 PM
  #43  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,635
Default

Originally Posted by Fly IFR
I'd like to say its all about skill, but it seems to be more about luck and timing.
I've seen this a lot lately. I see really good pilots way better than me get turned down from places and I'm like damn how in the hell am I going to make it?
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:30 PM
  #44  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,107
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
In my case I had a good friend take the same check ride with the same examiner only to also be failed twice. AFAIK he hasn't passed anybody on their CFI rides with him. so that's two checkrides a person for the last few years. At some point who's fault is it?
The general aviation playing field is certainly not level by any means, which is why I have a hard spot with employers holding 1-2 busts against someone.

But if the examiner has that bad of a reputation, I would start to doubt the judgement of someone who doesn't learn from the mistakes of others. specially if he keeps going back to the same guy.

We had a student who was morally opposed to paying $450 to a DPE when the feds would do it for free. After getting jerked around with scheduling for weeks, he had a 6-hour oral (commercial ASEL) followed by a pink slip for the PRE-FLIGHT. Then he went back to the same guy and pinked again, on the ground. This was a fed who had never in recorded history ever passed a student on any rating checkride...he obviously did that to discourage people from bothering him. That student was too stobborn for his own good.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:32 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fly IFR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: X
Posts: 343
Default

Originally Posted by Cruz5350
I've seen this a lot lately. I see really good pilots way better than me get turned down from places and I'm like damn how in the hell am I going to make it?
Mistakes will be made, but never make the same mistake twice, that's a good rule to go by. There is always something to be learned. And if it's truly what you want (121) then you will not give up and figure out a way. Then after 6 months at an airline you'll miss being home, not having holidays, etc. But it's what all of us signed up for I guess.
Fly IFR is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 04:33 PM
  #46  
Respek
 
Cruz5350's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,635
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The general aviation playing field is certainly not level by any means, which is why I have a hard spot with employers holding 1-2 busts against someone.

But if the examiner has that bad of a reputation, I would start to doubt the judgement of someone who doesn't learn from the mistakes of others. specially if he keeps going back to the same guy.

We had a student who was morally opposed to paying $450 to a DPE when the feds would do it for free. After getting jerked around with scheduling for weeks, he had a 6-hour oral (commercial ASEL) followed by a pink slip for the PRE-FLIGHT. Then he went back to the same guy and pinked again, on the ground. This was a fed who had never in recorded history ever passed a student on any rating checkride...he obviously did that to discourage people from bothering him. That student was too stobborn for his own good.
Thank you for saying that!!! I told my friend not to take his ride with him better yet I begged him not to. After the first bust I pleaded him not to go again. He was to stubborn to learn and now he has 2 busts.
Cruz5350 is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 05:14 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: B737 F/O
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR
That 'idiot' lawyer is doing exactly what he is PAID to do by the people who are bringing the law suit. I'm no fan of lawyers in general (except for the popular case where you need one yourself), but hate the system right along with the players.

USMCFLYR
I am, USMC. And I agree with you totally. I'm just more interested in protecting myself than anything else, hence the first suggestion. Once these people start running around with subpoenas, clamoring for 'justice', people other than the ones at fault for the accident will feel the most effects. The CA and F/O are dead. 9L is now part of Pinnacle. Sure, some money will change hands, congressmen will grandstand about a 1,500hr rule, but really, the rest of the us who are safe, competent pilots will receive the fallout every time we go to work.

I have friends who I've flown many times with who are safe, knowledgeable pilots who can't find a job because of their failed check rides. I had my manuals checked by a Fed several times in one week as a 'crackdown' on the regionals, showing how 'safety conscious' our system is. It's all window dressing, and is what happens when the 'legal' system, and the 'public' get in over their heads....
LostInPA is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 07:59 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Window_Seat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 389
Default

Originally Posted by jdalbrec
+1, Agreed. Everyone wants to do well, but unfortunately it's human nature to try and find the easy way. I can recall someone in training just raised their hand and said..."yea, that's great but what's actually going to be on test?" This is when it really becomes sad; when people that consider aviation to be their passion, start to fall into this mindset. You really can't know too much or be too proficient.
Might all come back to pay... you get what you pay for.
Window_Seat is offline  
Old 10-24-2011, 08:55 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jsfBoat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Lovin' life at .4 (ish) mach
Posts: 1,317
Default

When I was going through my school, I chatted with a former grad who was pink slipped for not landing center line on a grass runway. No way to contest that, nothing could be done. DPEs fail people for things that they shouldn't be failed for. I failed the MEI ride on the first attempt because I used 8" MP and Prop back to the detente to simulate zero thrust, as described by Beech for the BE-76. Was busted because I was not "...able to see exactly where 8" MP is because the MP gauge only goes down to 10" ". Even pulling out the manual and showing him still did not allow me to pass the first time. Second time I went up, did it his way (13" MP) and received the congratulatory hand shake. I assume he needed the reexamination fee to help pay for his luxury SUV with the leather interior.

In my opinion, 121 operators should not even care about failed CFI rides anyways. I'm not wanting to go there to flight instruct, want to go and fly something else besides a C-172. They should allow people to get the jobs, then if they can't make it through training, or pass their checkrides as suggested previously, then be let go. All I want is the chance to be able to prove myself, I can do it and be successful.

I've flown with a lot of guys who never failed a ride, that are at the regionals and else where, that I would be scared to put the neighbors dog on board an airplane they are flying.

Besides, wasn't the FO on 3407 the one who made a configuration change (raising the flaps) without the Captain's say so?
jsfBoat is offline  
Old 10-25-2011, 04:10 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by jsfBoat
When I was going through my school, I chatted with a former grad who was pink slipped for not landing center line on a grass runway. No way to contest that, nothing could be done. DPEs fail people for things that they shouldn't be failed for. I failed the MEI ride on the first attempt because I used 8" MP and Prop back to the detente to simulate zero thrust, as described by Beech for the BE-76. Was busted because I was not "...able to see exactly where 8" MP is because the MP gauge only goes down to 10" ". Even pulling out the manual and showing him still did not allow me to pass the first time. Second time I went up, did it his way (13" MP) and received the congratulatory hand shake. I assume he needed the reexamination fee to help pay for his luxury SUV with the leather interior.
Is it your contention that this was the ONLY thing that you failed for on your MEI chekride?

In my opinion, 121 operators should not even care about failed CFI rides anyways. I'm not wanting to go there to flight instruct, want to go and fly something else besides a C-172. They should allow people to get the jobs, then if they can't make it through training, or pass their checkrides as suggested previously, then be let go. All I want is the chance to be able to prove myself, I can do it and be successful.
That is an awfully expensive way to run a business. Those training busts are not cheap. One way to recoup those losses would be a training contract. Would you favor one of those? Obviously the business (any business) looks for a candidate that can pass whatever training regime is expected - whether it be academic or physical. Anything else is loss time and effort.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jbt1407
Aviation Law
10
09-15-2012 10:42 AM
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
CLewis
Part 135
5
07-11-2011 06:35 PM
TonyWilliams
Regional
62
02-27-2011 10:49 AM
joel payne
Regional
7
02-24-2009 06:54 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices