Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
ASE-DEN Q400 weight restrictions >

ASE-DEN Q400 weight restrictions

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ASE-DEN Q400 weight restrictions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2011, 12:51 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Cruz Clearance's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 177
Default ASE-DEN Q400 weight restrictions

Just flew in today and planning my commute out. Due to the runway expansion project UAX let everyone know today that they plan on a divert to EGE if tailwinds pick up. Can I expect the Q400 to be weight restricted flying ASE-DEN?
Cruz Clearance is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 03:36 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheDashRocks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Posts: 305
Default

YV Dash 8-200's were approved to circle to RWY 33. I believe Lynx did also with the Quatro. Your planned ride may be allowed to circle and avoid the tailwind. The jets cannot circle.
TheDashRocks is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 06:02 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JSDL's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Round Two
Posts: 374
Default

I wasn't aware that there were any UAX Q's in DEN. Who is supposedly flying them?
JSDL is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 06:24 PM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: CL65
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by JSDL
I wasn't aware that there were any UAX Q's in DEN. Who is supposedly flying them?
There aren't any UAX Q400s in DEN. As someone very familiar with the UAX ASE ops I know what the original poster is asking. The poster knows that United Express CR7 will be having performance problems getting in and out of ASE as the runway is shortened, so he is wondering if Republic's Q400s will have weight issues in and out of ASE. I know that Republic (previously Lynx) can circle, so tailwinds won't be an issue for them on landing. On takeoff, I have only seen them depart Runway 33 as runway 15 requires a waiver for departure. I'm not sure what their tailwind component is for takeoff, but with the runway now being shortened to 6500ft from 7000ft and on some days shortened to 6000ft, I think a tailwind for departure off 33 can give them weight restriction issues as well. It's no secret, (United does not have flights booked on these days) Skywest is not operating in and out of ASE on the days that the runway is 6000ft long.
USC328 is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 06:40 PM
  #5  
Gets Tue/Wed and Sat Off
 
Vegaspilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 551
Default

The Q at Lynx was approved for 20 kt tailwind departures, but with the runway shortened it might affect that.
Vegaspilot is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 06:58 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: 737 CA
Posts: 959
Default

Originally Posted by Vegaspilot
The Q at Lynx was approved for 20 kt tailwind departures, but with the runway shortened it might affect that.
If their 20 knot tailwind restrictions are similar to ours it's quite easy to actually do it, so runway length (and climb performance of the Q4) would be the primary limitation.

I'll see what the length penalty is tomorrow if they stick it on our performance numbers.
DirectTo is offline  
Old 09-09-2011, 08:07 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Sounder's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: The Arrr Jay
Posts: 49
Default

A couple years ago Durango had the runway shortened to less than 6000 ft if I remember right, and we were usually only booked to 66 people for weight restrictions on the Q4. But even though it was the middle of the summer we still would usually take a full boat or very close to it (around 70-72ish).
Sounder is offline  
Old 09-10-2011, 09:22 AM
  #8  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: CL65
Posts: 15
Default

Originally Posted by Sounder
A couple years ago Durango had the runway shortened to less than 6000 ft if I remember right, and we were usually only booked to 66 people for weight restrictions on the Q4. But even though it was the middle of the summer we still would usually take a full boat or very close to it (around 70-72ish).
That sounds like a decent comparison to ASE. For those not familiar, DRO is about 6600ft MSL, ASE is about 7700ft MSL.
USC328 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captlonestar
Technical
8
02-04-2011 01:41 AM
HSLD
Pilot Health
1
12-13-2006 05:32 PM
Mike-Air
Career Questions
22
12-09-2006 05:04 PM
RJ85FO
Regional
3
11-13-2006 10:18 AM
ryane946
Regional
12
07-16-2006 07:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices