Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Mesaba

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-12-2011, 03:47 PM
  #41  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

A better solution. Sign an LOA NOT forcing every displacement to spur a secondary (as the JCBA mandates). Then, you raise hiring mins going forward and only interview/hire through 1 pipeline. Everyone keeps their job, seniority is intact, company makes money, and our pilots can still move around to where they want (obviously seniority rules).

In return, the company could be willing to absorb some of the "excess" to keep ahead of attrition for the first time ever at 9E and 9L. What a concept. Everybody wins.

Too easy I guess. I didn't even need a drink to come up with that one.
higney85 is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 04:07 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
A better solution. Sign an LOA NOT forcing every displacement to spur a secondary (as the JCBA mandates). Then, you raise hiring mins going forward and only interview/hire through 1 pipeline. Everyone keeps their job, seniority is intact, company makes money, and our pilots can still move around to where they want (obviously seniority rules).

In return, the company could be willing to absorb some of the "excess" to keep ahead of attrition for the first time ever at 9E and 9L. What a concept. Everybody wins.

Too easy I guess. I didn't even need a drink to come up with that one.
Lol, you've been drinking since the displacements started!
Bartok is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 04:30 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joethepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
A better solution. Sign an LOA NOT forcing every displacement to spur a secondary (as the JCBA mandates). Then, you raise hiring mins going forward and only interview/hire through 1 pipeline. Everyone keeps their job, seniority is intact, company makes money, and our pilots can still move around to where they want (obviously seniority rules).

In return, the company could be willing to absorb some of the "excess" to keep ahead of attrition for the first time ever at 9E and 9L. What a concept. Everybody wins.

Too easy I guess. I didn't even need a drink to come up with that one.
So we sign this LOA you're suggesting... and when they close the next Saab base... for ****s and giggles lets say its MSP(no i don't know anything)... you then expect the comany to absorb 80 secondary displacements just because they're allowed to do that now? Don't think so.

Also, if you haven't caught on yet, they could have absorbed every single one of those displacements if they wanted. Mr. Workman is notorious for putting out a "revised vacancy/realignment/award" right before the close, right after he runs everyone's current bid card through the computer. Ask some Mesaba guys, happens all the time. So if he wanted to absorb any secondary vacancies he would simply put out a revised realignment with an increase in the number of vacancies in the position he wanted to absorb. Yeah, it might cause a few voluntary moves into that position, but they can tell how many, and I guarantee you they run the numbers and change it to cost the least amount of dollars.

This is not the one aircraft type in each base type of airline anymore. vacancies/realignments/displacements are much more complicated than they were in the pinnacle world of old.
joethepilot is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 04:46 PM
  #44  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

Originally Posted by joethepilot
So we sign this LOA you're suggesting... and when they close the next Saab base... for ****s and giggles lets say its MSP(no i don't know anything)... you then expect the comany to absorb 80 secondary displacements just because they're allowed to do that now? Don't think so.

Also, if you haven't caught on yet, they could have absorbed every single one of those displacements if they wanted. Mr. Workman is notorious for putting out a "revised vacancy/realignment/award" right before the close, right after he runs everyone's current bid card through the computer. Ask some Mesaba guys, happens all the time. So if he wanted to absorb any secondary vacancies he would simply put out a revised realignment with an increase in the number of vacancies in the position he wanted to absorb. Yeah, it might cause a few voluntary moves into that position, but they can tell how many, and I guarantee you they run the numbers and change it to cost the least amount of dollars.

This is not the one aircraft type in each base type of airline anymore. vacancies/realignments/displacements are much more complicated than they were in the pinnacle world of old.

You may want to see the staffing, including the training numbers and the number of pilots awaiting class dates elsewhere.
higney85 is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 04:48 PM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2011
Posts: 87
Default

Originally Posted by Av8tion
The solution is really easy... you give super-seniority to the pinnacle guys who are under 1000/100... they can't be displaced... then when they get over 1000/100 they go down to where they would've been displaced to... I can't imagine too many pilots being more than a couple months from meeting the time requirements... as much as I disagree with pinnacle's criminal hiring practices, I disagree more with pilots being kicked to the street after being guaranteed a job....
Here's an even easier solution: how about all new hires actually have experience flying, as in 1500 TT, an ATP, actual PIC in something besides the little mosquito they soloed in. Fly cargo, checks, instruct, SOMETHING!! I'm tired of the pilot mill / wet ticket, clueless parental trust-fund idiots!! Go prove you can actually hand fly something, at night, in weather, possibly alone even, and do it for a few years.
I see baby captains with no PIC in anything somehow survive upgrade only to scare the crap out of countless FOs. It's not a matter of "if", it is a matter of "when"......
SLIbandit is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 05:30 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PropDriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: In charge of the remote
Posts: 207
Default

Here's a thought: Hire every one of the Republic furloughees. They had to have an ATP to get on there and they all can pass a Part 121 training program.

Problem solved.

Time for a beer...
PropDriver is offline  
Old 09-12-2011, 05:41 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Avroman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: FIRE ALPA
Posts: 3,097
Default

Originally Posted by SLIbandit
Here's an even easier solution: how about all new hires actually have experience flying, as in 1500 TT, an ATP, actual PIC in something besides the little mosquito they soloed in. Fly cargo, checks, instruct, SOMETHING!! I'm tired of the pilot mill / wet ticket, clueless parental trust-fund idiots!! Go prove you can actually hand fly something, at night, in weather, possibly alone even, and do it for a few years.
I see baby captains with no PIC in anything somehow survive upgrade only to scare the crap out of countless FOs. It's not a matter of "if", it is a matter of "when"......

Nobody with that experience is interested in being a first officer on the Saab in Dulles for years for the crap pay a regional offers.... they are all either applying to a major, a corporate outfit, or have quit the industry and are working elsewhere.
Avroman is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 01:55 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpwannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Student Pilot
Posts: 2,277
Default

Originally Posted by Luv2Rotate
All new hires with 9L, 9E, will go to the Saab( so i've been told). I know IAH and IAD need Saab FO's. The displaced Saab FO's in Boston and LGA will probably go for the Jet since the last "Q" class was in April which means the Q has very limited openings right now.
That's cool. I like HOU b/c it's on the water...Gulf of Mexico and the cost of living is pretty decent. The DC area wouldn't be too bad either b/c I have a brother that lives in Silver Spring and a sister that lives in Bowie.


atp
atpwannabe is offline  
Old 09-14-2011, 03:17 PM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
WIPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 630
Default

Originally Posted by Avroman
Nobody with that experience is interested in being a first officer on the Saab in Dulles for years for the crap pay a regional offers.... they are all either applying to a major, a corporate outfit, or have quit the industry and are working elsewhere.
I dont think you could be more wrong. Where are these major and corporate jobs that you speak of? consider these furloughs are pretty much newhires.
WIPilot is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
naley70b
Regional
58
02-11-2011 07:07 AM
Cessnadriver
Regional
27
11-16-2007 07:10 PM
copcar1988
Regional
17
10-24-2006 05:34 PM
fireman0174
Regional
10
04-25-2006 07:56 PM
CRM1337
Regional
2
10-14-2005 05:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices