Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Skywest Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2006, 08:31 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

There are several EMB CA's that came from the CRJ having never flown the EMB. I have worked with a few of them. To upgrade to CA on the EMB you need 2500 hours and 1000 121 crew time. If you come to the airline at the hiring mins that puts upgrade at about 1 1/2 years.

I also have a friend that has just past 2 years in August and was awarded upgrade on the CRJ for November. That puts upgrade at about 2 1/2 years.

I do fly for SKW.

Last edited by JetJock16; 09-30-2006 at 08:38 PM.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 09-30-2006, 08:37 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by Freightpuppy
My question is why are all these people that can hold Brasilia captain after a year with the company bypassing it? Not very smart in my opinion unless you are planning to stay with SkyWest the rest of your life.
This is easy to answer. Most are worried about upgrading to CA on an aircraft they have never flown. I taught the CRJ-200 for 1 1/2 years before I started flying the EMB for SKW. The CRJ is a much easier airplane to fly and learn. I have flown with several CAs who moved over from the Jet having never flown the Bro (Emb) and most all said they wouldn't have done it if they had known what it was going to be like.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 06:32 AM
  #13  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
I have flown with several CAs who moved over from the Jet having never flown the Bro (Emb) and most all said they wouldn't have done it if they had known what it was going to be like.
Uh oh....maybe that's why my fiancee is a basketcase right now. Never flew out west, never flew the airplane, first captain upgrade. Maybe I should stop thinking he is blowing it out of proportion and freaking out too much huh?
Freightpuppy is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 07:49 AM
  #14  
Happy to be here
 
acl65pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A-320A
Posts: 18,563
Default

The 120 is an airplane that was over designed. When I typed on it I had two years in the right seat before the type ride. It is an aircraft that runs on DC power not ac like most transport aircraft. That is quite confusing for most. They set up the instruments alot like the 57/67. It is an a/c that will tech you how to fly. Always stay on top of it. Other than that it was a blast to fly, but I was glad to get off of it...
acl65pilot is offline  
Old 10-01-2006, 08:57 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

I agree the Bro is a blast to fly. But it's a very busy ride. When the airplane was designed in the late 70's it was way ahead of it's time; being fast, efficient, and well designed for harsh flying. BUT, it's past it's time and should be retired to the freight dog community. I enjoy my time flying it. It's a blast to be cleared for a visual at 11K over SFO - drop the gear, flaps 15, props MAX, power idle and you'll quickly find yourself doing 180 kts while descending at 4500-5000 ftm in a 30º turn. It’s basically a power off 180 in a Bro. It's a great airplane that's past it's regional time. Let's bring in the Q400s.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 10-02-2006, 09:49 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fatmike69's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: EMB120 CA
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
It's a blast to be cleared for a visual at 11K over SFO - drop the gear, flaps 15, props MAX, power idle and you'll quickly find yourself doing 180 kts while descending at 4500-5000 ftm in a 30º turn. It’s basically a power off 180 in a Bro. It's a great airplane that's past it's regional time. Let's bring in the Q400s.
One of my favorite approaches. Imagine if SKYW let us bring in the first notch of flaps at 200 KIAS like Embraer designed it, then imagine the descent rate you'd get (not that I've ever tried it )

Last edited by fatmike69; 10-02-2006 at 09:52 AM. Reason: gramatical correction
fatmike69 is offline  
Old 10-03-2006, 08:14 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,221
Default

How long do you think with EMBs will be around? I should be ready for the regionals in 4-5 years... just curious. Being from California my top choice for my regional has always been SKW on the EMB-120.

Also, can someone post a line of time for the EMB... just curious what the flying looks like.

Thanks guys!
coryk is offline  
Old 10-03-2006, 08:38 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AviatorGP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 737-FO
Posts: 114
Default

Jerry says a long time !!!! Lines are mostly 3-4 day trips with duty days averagin 8-10 hours a day, sometimes longer, sometimes shorter. 8 legs is VERY common (and dangerous in my eyes), but we will be keeping Bro's for a while....Good luck !
AviatorGP is offline  
Old 10-03-2006, 09:50 PM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Position: FO dhc-6
Posts: 523
Default

Originally Posted by coryk
? I should be ready for the regionals in 4-5 years!
half the regionals may not be around in 4-5 years!
hatetobreakit2u is offline  
Old 10-04-2006, 07:04 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,221
Default

True that! Hopefully Skywest is though.
coryk is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JustAMushroom
Regional
65
07-16-2006 10:44 PM
Pylot
Hangar Talk
0
08-27-2005 05:57 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM
mda62
Hiring News
2
06-06-2005 09:57 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices