Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours >

Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Calling all Captains to support 1500 hours

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-29-2011, 11:58 AM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by slough

Working now amongst my peers(blue collar&white collar) involves 50-60+ hours works weeks instead the old 40 hour work weeks. 500 hours a year instructing would require not working a full work week somewhere else. Try working 65 hours a week and figuring out a way to build time instructing part-time. One of the guys I work with has a dad who just retired with a nice pension after living a blue collar life working a 40 hour schedule. Now his kid is working 60 hours per week for about the same money, less pension, and lives in a condo. His dad doesn't come to the yard to bust our balls about how badass he is and how lazy we are.
Why not instruct full time?
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 12:12 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 187
Default

Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
Why not instruct full time?
I am going to make the move this fall either to instructing or flying divers which I am doing on my days off now. I am waiting until summers over because summer is the busy season at work and would burn bridges if I left now.
slough is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 12:13 PM
  #73  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 91
Default

I think the real issue is decision making experience and not just experience. I am in support of the 1500 rule for one major reason. It forces potential airline pilots to build hours doing meaningful flying I.E. instruction, freight, etc where they are forced to learn and make decisions. Gaining experience as an FO does very little in terms of learning decision making. The is a big difference in REAL experience between the guy who gets his certs with 250 hours and builds time working towards an ATP in a meaningful way verses the guy who goes right to an airline to be babysat for a few years. You need to learn to make decisions, and that happens when you are forced to make decisions rather than when you watch someone else make them while you fumble on the radios.
So in terms of the 2000+ hr pilots that have been mentioned on this thread keep in mind that its just a number. If we look at the breakdown we'd probably see that each of them had an unhealthy amount (too much) SIC time and not enough real, useful time.
The 1500 rule will force pilots to build time in meaningful ways. If you're not willing to spend a while instructing, hauling freight or doing any of the many crappy jobs we put up with to get to the top you don't belong at the top. Suck it up, learn to be PIC and send me your app once you've rightfully earned your ATP.
Did that make me sound opinionated?
IdahoFlyer is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 12:27 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
clearprop's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Position: Right Seat Spouse
Posts: 452
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
Because that means I have to spend two whole years out of a forty year career flying around is a tiny, hot, dirty, old airplane teaching losers to get $100 hamburgers. Heck, I already am going to spend three years in a RJ (I expect to upgrade in about 20 months, then get my 1000 TPIC), before I go to Super Fantastic Mainline. Oh, and when I get there, I'm going right into the 777, forget the Super 80's.... they are just so 1980's.
Hey watch it! I'm one of those losers who flies a 182 for a $100.00 burger!
clearprop is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 12:45 PM
  #75  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,948
Default

Idaho...I'm tired of hearing breakdowns of experience. I have flown with low time wonders that have better stick an rudder skills than CA's I used to fly with. There's more than one thing that makes a good pilot. What about those 7-10K hour hacks?
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 01:10 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,839
Default

Originally Posted by slough
Their experience should just be viewed factually as what it was. Not what someone thinks it must have been because of the negligence involved in the crash.
No - like everyone says - numbers don't tell the whole story in the aviation game. I believe that.

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 02:29 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,342
Default

Originally Posted by IdahoFlyer
I think the real issue is decision making experience and not just experience. I am in support of the 1500 rule for one major reason. It forces potential airline pilots to build hours doing meaningful flying I.E. instruction, freight, etc where they are forced to learn and make decisions. Gaining experience as an FO does very little in terms of learning decision making. The is a big difference in REAL experience between the guy who gets his certs with 250 hours and builds time working towards an ATP in a meaningful way verses the guy who goes right to an airline to be babysat for a few years. You need to learn to make decisions, and that happens when you are forced to make decisions rather than when you watch someone else make them while you fumble on the radios.
So in terms of the 2000+ hr pilots that have been mentioned on this thread keep in mind that its just a number. If we look at the breakdown we'd probably see that each of them had an unhealthy amount (too much) SIC time and not enough real, useful time.
The 1500 rule will force pilots to build time in meaningful ways. If you're not willing to spend a while instructing, hauling freight or doing any of the many crappy jobs we put up with to get to the top you don't belong at the top. Suck it up, learn to be PIC and send me your app once you've rightfully earned your ATP.
Did that make me sound opinionated?
I support the ATP rule not because I believe it will put an end to unqualified FOs who put an unnecessary burden on a captain on the line, but because it will put a barrier to the industry to prevent someone from getting a $90,000 loan and being at an airline in 3 months.

If you want to improve safety and get better pilots in the right seat, interviews must be more challenging, 121 training should be providing pilots with the required skills to fly the line, not to pass a canned checkride, and pilots must have acquired adequate skills. Requiring 1500 hours or an ATP does not ensure adequate skills. You mention that people should have more PIC experience before entering a 121 cockpit, but what would prevent a 250 hour pilot from getting on with a 135 operation and logging 1250 hours of SIC time to get their ATP?

The only real solution is for current pilots to get involved with the interviewing and training process to ensure the new pilots they select won’t be a burden to other captains. As many threads on this topic has proven, it is impossible to compare instructing, to flying jumpers, to flying freight, to sitting right seat at a 135 operation, to flying traffic, or to patrolling pipelines. The real answer to this question is to look at each pilot individually at an interview and be willing to say no even when your operation is hurting for pilots. When enough interviewing pilots say no, the airline will be forced to increase pay and the quality of pilots will increase. But since regionals are a stepping stone and most don't plan to stay longer than they needs to, why invest so much of your time and energy in a process that will take many years to pay off?
2StgTurbine is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 02:59 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: single pilot cargo, turboprop
Posts: 484
Default

I see a lot of guys recommending 135 freight. I agree it's been a great way to gain experience, but you need to realize a couple things. Electronic imaging is taking a lot of the check hauling biz. The focus is shifting to FedEx and UPS, which typically means larger planes of which it's harder to convince captains to make a "lateral" move to a regional right seat.
own nav is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 04:07 PM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,244
Default

Originally Posted by slough
Working now amongst my peers(blue collar&white collar) involves 50-60+ hours works weeks instead the old 40 hour work weeks. 500 hours a year instructing would require not working a full work week somewhere else. Try working 65 hours a week and figuring out a way to build time instructing part-time. One of the guys I work with has a dad who just retired with a nice pension after living a blue collar life working a 40 hour schedule. Now his kid is working 60 hours per week for about the same money, less pension, and lives in a condo. His dad doesn't come to the yard to bust our balls about how badass he is and how lazy we are.
Jesus Christ on a crutch! A 60 hour work week! God forbid!

It's a more competitive world. If it's worth having, maybe it's worth working hard for.
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-29-2011, 04:17 PM
  #80  
alchemist
 
meeko031's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,089
Default

refuse to fly with these (lowtime)newhires if they are unsafe???????
meeko031 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATCsaidDoWhat
Major
21
09-20-2010 03:22 AM
n287hg
Regional
35
10-12-2009 06:40 AM
duvie
Regional
31
08-03-2009 09:00 AM
mjarosz
Regional
6
05-20-2009 05:05 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
2
07-04-2006 05:58 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices