Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Feeling the love at ASA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-2011, 07:25 AM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by ysslah
{Sarcasm}

You all must be one of those few people wanting this company to fail, aren't you?

{/Sarcasm}
It seems the only people that want this company to fail are the idiot middle management that can't seem to do anything right.
selcal is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 07:34 AM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
Default

So it's ALPA's fault for providing input on the pairing construction process, it's Delta's fault for hiring too many of our mechanics, and it's the crew schedulers' fault for being inexperienced. At what point will someone in leadership step up, take a little bit of responsibility and say "You know what, we didn't fully account for certain factors and we miscalculated our staffing needs." In the absence of such a statement, I'm left to believe that leaving us understaffed was a calculated decision -- that punishing our passengers, our crews, and our mainline partners was deemed preferable to spending the money to hire and upgrade a few more crews.

The adequacy of an airline's staffing is not determined by the rows and columns of some Excel document -- it's determined by how many pilot seats are empty while the passenger seats are full.
todd1200 is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 07:43 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2009
Posts: 160
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
So it's ALPA's fault for providing input on the pairing construction process, it's Delta's fault for hiring too many of our mechanics, and it's the crew schedulers' fault for being inexperienced. At what point will someone in leadership step up, take a little bit of responsibility and say "You know what, we didn't fully account for certain factors and we miscalculated our staffing needs." In the absence of such a statement, I'm left to believe that leaving us understaffed was a calculated decision -- that punishing our passengers, our crews, and our mainline partners was deemed preferable to spending the money to hire and upgrade a few more crews.

The adequacy of an airline's staffing is not determined by the rows and columns of some Excel document -- it's determined by how many pilot seats are empty while the passenger seats are full.
Well said!!!!!
selcal is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 07:44 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Well his memo says that there have been zero drafts this month compared to 35 last year. Well I was drafted out of RGT earlier in the month. Why does his memo say zero drafts??? It was even coded DRA in skedplus.

Also we increased from 4.7 to 4.9 crews/aircraft. That's an increase of just over 1% yet we have a 4.7% increase in flying. You do the math. He kept touting the increase in crews/aircraft like staffing is better than last year. It's not. Where's the number for crews/aircraft in relation to block hours.
atlmsl is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 08:16 AM
  #45  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 84
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
...that punishing our passengers, our crews, and our mainline partners was deemed preferable to spending the money to hire and upgrade a few more crews.

The adequacy of an airline's staffing is not determined by the rows and columns of some Excel document -- it's determined by how many pilot seats are empty while the passenger seats are full.
+1 and well said. Passengers are number 1, and noone wants to see the company fail. We just want to be a part of a better company.

Why compare to 2010, we were understaffed then and we are understaffed now. I'm getting the sense they are planning to take away some flying in the future, and make us staffed correctly then. 7 year upgrades, love it! (sarcasm)
TopNotch is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 10:46 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by atlmsl
Well his memo says that there have been zero drafts this month compared to 35 last year. Well I was drafted out of RGT earlier in the month. Why does his memo say zero drafts??? It was even coded DRA in skedplus.

Also we increased from 4.7 to 4.9 crews/aircraft. That's an increase of just over 1% yet we have a 4.7% increase in flying. You do the math. He kept touting the increase in crews/aircraft like staffing is better than last year. It's not. Where's the number for crews/aircraft in relation to block hours.
4.7 to 4.9 is about just over 1%?

Try 4.25%
WstCstCmtr is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:22 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by WstCstCmtr
4.7 to 4.9 is about just over 1%?

Try 4.25%
So I can't do math. Point remains. 4.25% increase in staffing with a 4.7% increase in flying.
atlmsl is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:31 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Posts: 298
Default

Originally Posted by TopNotch
+1 and well said. Passengers are number 1, and noone wants to see the company fail. We just want to be a part of a better company.

Why compare to 2010, we were understaffed then and we are understaffed now. I'm getting the sense they are planning to take away some flying in the future, and make us staffed correctly then. 7 year upgrades, love it! (sarcasm)
Is ASA scheduled to have contracts expire?
PurdueFlyer is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:41 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by atlmsl
So I can't do math. Point remains. 4.25% increase in staffing with a 4.7% increase in flying.
Do you have a reference for the 4.7% increase?
WstCstCmtr is offline  
Old 06-20-2011, 11:49 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetPipeOverht's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Stagnant..
Posts: 438
Default

You can't count on historical stats and irrelevant staffing techniques when they simply fail or do not adapt them to current times and the predicament we find ourselves in. Zero accountability followed by not paying to maintain said staffing concerns and allowing the place to fester with rumors are not the fault of the employee, but that of the management who fails to heed the warning signs.

Insanity - From Latin, Adjective; Means doing the same thing, over and over again, and expecting a different outcome
JetPipeOverht is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BigGuns
Major
13
02-05-2010 05:56 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
10-02-2008 10:46 PM
SWAjet
Major
10
10-27-2005 01:01 PM
RockBottom
Regional
0
08-17-2005 12:02 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
02-19-2005 03:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices