Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

9e/xj/9l sli

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-07-2011, 03:40 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Past V1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Home with my family playing with my daughter as much as possible
Posts: 591
Default

Changed mind after reading Higney's comment...wow....really?!?!

These guys have to learn how to read a contract!!!!
Past V1 is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 03:42 AM
  #22  
Inverted
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: CL65 CA
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by higney85
XJ is still contesting hire date vs. DOH.
I'm contesting my pay rate, oh wait, we signed the contract and agreed to it, just like the LOA handling 9E hire date vs. DOH. Does Bloch have trouble understanding what a legal binding agreement is?
aviatorpr is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 04:25 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorpr
I'm contesting my pay rate, oh wait, we signed the contract and agreed to it, just like the LOA handling 9E hire date vs. DOH. Does Bloch have trouble understanding what a legal binding agreement is?
I still have yet to see where this LOA has anything to do with SLI.
Bartok is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 04:58 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Windsor's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Zee Airboos
Posts: 404
Default

that loa is 9e's pre-nup for the sli that puts 9e's pilots on the same playing field as xj and 9l. everyone voted this contract in. the loa was part of the package we all voted on. without this loa the 9e guys would be losing several months of seniority right off the bat. xj can contest till the cows come home, but in the end bloch will use the same date for everyone, their class start date.
Windsor is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 05:15 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
geddeh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Default

It seems there is a pretty big disconnect between what were being told by our respective MECs. Im pretty sick of this Mesaba said this...Pinnacle said this BS.
geddeh is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 05:42 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lone Palm's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Port of Indecision and Southwest of Disorder
Posts: 587
Default

It seems there is a pretty big disconnect between what were being told by our respective MECs. Im pretty sick of this Mesaba said this...Pinnacle said this BS.
I agree, and if we are still contesting this DOH issue why doesn't Bloch just say no and move forward?
Lone Palm is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 05:49 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: CA
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by Lone Palm
I agree, and if we are still contesting this DOH issue why doesn't Bloch just say no and move forward?
Is he paid by the amount of time in arbitration? If so, it may be awhile.
HIREME is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 05:55 AM
  #28  
Inverted
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: CL65 CA
Posts: 536
Default

Originally Posted by HIREME
Is he paid by the amount of time in arbitration? If so, it may be awhile.
Obviously he was paid before hand
aviatorpr is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 06:07 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Bartok's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2010
Position: Up Front
Posts: 1,628
Default

Originally Posted by Windsor
that loa is 9e's pre-nup for the sli that puts 9e's pilots on the same playing field as xj and 9l. everyone voted this contract in. the loa was part of the package we all voted on. without this loa the 9e guys would be losing several months of seniority right off the bat. xj can contest till the cows come home, but in the end bloch will use the same date for everyone, their class start date.
I'm not arguing that it's not, or saying that it shouldn't be.

I just don't see anything that states this was to be used for SLI or anything anywhere about 9E changing their dates for SLI specifically.

I would love to hear ALPA Nationals interpretation of 9E's seniority list as it pertains to DOH.
Bartok is offline  
Old 06-07-2011, 06:31 AM
  #30  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

Originally Posted by Lone Palm
I agree, and if we are still contesting this DOH issue why doesn't Bloch just say no and move forward?
Bloch hasn't said a word since the lists went in other than asking our guys to send the certified 6/1 list directly to the CJC and XJ merger chairs. We are all still waiting. All that happened last night (which obviously leaked out) is the XJ merger chair sent an email challenging the DOH/Seniority date as well as try and say that lists can't change when 9E has had movement in 200+ positions (new hires, upgrades, terminated guys getting jobs back, etc).
higney85 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FlyJSH
Regional
666
05-22-2011 05:43 PM
mastercraft
Major
750
02-09-2011 08:39 AM
Aloha
Regional
75
06-12-2010 06:15 PM
Myboyblue
Mergers and Acquisitions
8
04-29-2010 07:39 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices