CO-Pilot time
#21
To keep this from getting confusing...
Even if you have a full type rating in the plane that you are flying, if you are not the Captain and the one that signed for the airplane you NEVER log pilot in command time. IF the Captain is not able to continue his duties as PIC (such as he dies) then you are the only one left and have assumed command and can log that time as PIC but id recommend putting a note in the comments.
As a first officer you log total time and SIC time for the entire duration of the flight regardless of who was on the controls.
Even if you have a full type rating in the plane that you are flying, if you are not the Captain and the one that signed for the airplane you NEVER log pilot in command time. IF the Captain is not able to continue his duties as PIC (such as he dies) then you are the only one left and have assumed command and can log that time as PIC but id recommend putting a note in the comments.
As a first officer you log total time and SIC time for the entire duration of the flight regardless of who was on the controls.
Actually, FAA legal interpretation states that even WITHOUT a full type (but having qualified in the seat through a 121 training program), an SIC (with SIC type) can LOG PIC time during that time when he is the SOLE MANIPULATOR of the controls.
That said, as previously mentioned, that time is generally NOT considered "valid" PIC time by the airlines.
February 9, 1999
Bill Carpenter
12808 E. Pacific Drive, #302 Aurora, Colorado 80014
Dear Mr. Carpenter:
Thank you for your letter of January 25, 1999, in which you ask questions about logging pilot in command (PIC) time and second in command (SIC) time when operating under Part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)
You first ask whether it would be proper under FAR 61.51(g) for a properly qualified SIC to log instrument flight time flown during instrument conditions while serving as the SIC in Part 121 operations on an aircraft that requires two crewmembers. The answer is yes. As a qualified SIC, and as a required crewmember, you are "operating" the aircraft within the meaning of FAR 61.51(g). Therefore, as the SIC operating the aircraft "solely by reference to instruments under actual or simulated instrument flight conditions," you would log that time as SIC flown in instrument conditions. Naturally, the PIC logs the time as PIC flown in instrument conditions.
You then ask if, for the purposes of maintaining instrument currency, an instrument approach on the above flight flown by the PIC can be logged as an instrument approach by the SIC. The answer is no. As the SIC you have not "performed" the approach as contemplated by FAR 61.57(c) because you were not the sole manipulator of the controls during the approach.
Lastly, you present the following scenario: under a Part 121 operation the air carrier has designated a pilot and a copilot as required by FAR 121.385(c). The pilot is the authorized PIC and the copilot is the authorized SIC. The PIC is also the company check airman. During the course of the flight, the SIC is the sole manipulator of the controls for the flight. Additionally, he has passed the competency checks required for Part 121 operations, at least as SIC. You ask whether the SIC can log PIC time for that portion of the flight in which he is the sole manipulator of the controls for the flight. The answer is yes.
There is a distinction between acting as pilot in command and logging of pilot in command time. "Pilot in command," as defined in FAR 1.1, "means the pilot responsible for the operation and safety of an aircraft during flight time." FAR 61.51(e) is a flight-time logging regulation, which only regulates the recording of PIC time used to meet the requirements toward a higher certificate, higher rating, or for recent flight experience:
2
(e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time.
(1) A recreational private or commercial pilot may log pilot-in- command time only for that flight time during which that person -- (i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated_ (ii) Is the sole occupant of the aircraft: or (iii) Except for a recreational pilot is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.
(2) An airline transport pilot may log as pilot-in-command time all of the flight time while acting as pilot-in-command of an operation requiring an airline transport pilot certificate.
While it is not possible for two pilots to act as PIC simultaneously, it is possible for two pilots to log PIC flight time simultaneously. If the pilot is designated as PIC by the certificate holder, as required by FAR 121.385(c), that person is PIC for the entire flight, no matter who is actually manipulating the controls of the aircraft, because that pilot is responsible for the safety and operation of the aircraft. The pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of the aircraft for which the pilot is rated may also log that flight as PIC.
It is important to remember that we are dealing with logging of flight time only for purposes of FAR 61.51, where you are keeping a record to show recent flight experience or to show that you meet the requirements for a higher rating. Your question does not say if the SIC is fully qualified as a PIC, or only as an SIC. This is important because even though an SIC can log PIC time, that pilot may not be qualified to serve as PIC under Part 121.
I hope this satisfactorily answers your questions. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
D. Brent Pope
Attorney, ANM-7H
Bill Carpenter
12808 E. Pacific Drive, #302 Aurora, Colorado 80014
Dear Mr. Carpenter:
Thank you for your letter of January 25, 1999, in which you ask questions about logging pilot in command (PIC) time and second in command (SIC) time when operating under Part 121 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR)
You first ask whether it would be proper under FAR 61.51(g) for a properly qualified SIC to log instrument flight time flown during instrument conditions while serving as the SIC in Part 121 operations on an aircraft that requires two crewmembers. The answer is yes. As a qualified SIC, and as a required crewmember, you are "operating" the aircraft within the meaning of FAR 61.51(g). Therefore, as the SIC operating the aircraft "solely by reference to instruments under actual or simulated instrument flight conditions," you would log that time as SIC flown in instrument conditions. Naturally, the PIC logs the time as PIC flown in instrument conditions.
You then ask if, for the purposes of maintaining instrument currency, an instrument approach on the above flight flown by the PIC can be logged as an instrument approach by the SIC. The answer is no. As the SIC you have not "performed" the approach as contemplated by FAR 61.57(c) because you were not the sole manipulator of the controls during the approach.
Lastly, you present the following scenario: under a Part 121 operation the air carrier has designated a pilot and a copilot as required by FAR 121.385(c). The pilot is the authorized PIC and the copilot is the authorized SIC. The PIC is also the company check airman. During the course of the flight, the SIC is the sole manipulator of the controls for the flight. Additionally, he has passed the competency checks required for Part 121 operations, at least as SIC. You ask whether the SIC can log PIC time for that portion of the flight in which he is the sole manipulator of the controls for the flight. The answer is yes.
There is a distinction between acting as pilot in command and logging of pilot in command time. "Pilot in command," as defined in FAR 1.1, "means the pilot responsible for the operation and safety of an aircraft during flight time." FAR 61.51(e) is a flight-time logging regulation, which only regulates the recording of PIC time used to meet the requirements toward a higher certificate, higher rating, or for recent flight experience:
2
(e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time.
(1) A recreational private or commercial pilot may log pilot-in- command time only for that flight time during which that person -- (i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated_ (ii) Is the sole occupant of the aircraft: or (iii) Except for a recreational pilot is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.
(2) An airline transport pilot may log as pilot-in-command time all of the flight time while acting as pilot-in-command of an operation requiring an airline transport pilot certificate.
While it is not possible for two pilots to act as PIC simultaneously, it is possible for two pilots to log PIC flight time simultaneously. If the pilot is designated as PIC by the certificate holder, as required by FAR 121.385(c), that person is PIC for the entire flight, no matter who is actually manipulating the controls of the aircraft, because that pilot is responsible for the safety and operation of the aircraft. The pilot who is the sole manipulator of the controls of the aircraft for which the pilot is rated may also log that flight as PIC.
It is important to remember that we are dealing with logging of flight time only for purposes of FAR 61.51, where you are keeping a record to show recent flight experience or to show that you meet the requirements for a higher rating. Your question does not say if the SIC is fully qualified as a PIC, or only as an SIC. This is important because even though an SIC can log PIC time, that pilot may not be qualified to serve as PIC under Part 121.
I hope this satisfactorily answers your questions. If we can be of further assistance, please contact us.
D. Brent Pope
Attorney, ANM-7H
Last edited by FlyerJosh; 03-23-2011 at 12:52 PM.
#22
This is getting 21 (now 22) posts longer than it needs to be.
How about this...I personally have never met a single part 121 first officer who is typed in the airplane they are a first officer in who has logged a single minute of pilot in command time. Can it be done? Sure, why not..log whatever youd like. Will that time be worth more than the ink its written with? Not likely.
As for the moderator comment..I am not a moderator here because of my vast knowledge of all facets of aviation and the ins and outs of our FARs. I did not sit in front of a panel or even have an interview. I am just a guy who volunteers around here to keep this forum clean of terms of service violations. If you insult another member, post something inappropriate, or just generally become a nuisance I will moderate. I am wrong quite often...just ask my wife.
How about this...I personally have never met a single part 121 first officer who is typed in the airplane they are a first officer in who has logged a single minute of pilot in command time. Can it be done? Sure, why not..log whatever youd like. Will that time be worth more than the ink its written with? Not likely.
As for the moderator comment..I am not a moderator here because of my vast knowledge of all facets of aviation and the ins and outs of our FARs. I did not sit in front of a panel or even have an interview. I am just a guy who volunteers around here to keep this forum clean of terms of service violations. If you insult another member, post something inappropriate, or just generally become a nuisance I will moderate. I am wrong quite often...just ask my wife.
#23
Desperate Job Seeker: Im glad you asked, 'cause its a doozy of a story. See, back when I was a young handsome FO flying the trans-con, my bright captain (who had obviously never seen airplane) decided to order the fish...
#24
One consideration... Should you choose to log the time (as described/debated in this thread), that might help you if you are later employed by a Part 91 or 135 operator and you're trying to get insurance coverage.
#26
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 118
BS. When the Captain has the fish and keels over you best believe I'll log PIC for that portion of the flight. Who is in command now? You; or maybe Ted Stryker. Whoever it is would log PIC.
Sure, you wouldn't be legal to sign for the plane. And sure It'll look funny in the logbook with 1 hour PIC with no PIC type. They'll drill you in the interview and you'll come back with a heck of a story.
Or maybe i'm totally wrong.
Sure, you wouldn't be legal to sign for the plane. And sure It'll look funny in the logbook with 1 hour PIC with no PIC type. They'll drill you in the interview and you'll come back with a heck of a story.
Or maybe i'm totally wrong.
#27
You are incorrect, sir. This may be true in a king air/part 91 world, but in the 121 world, the one who signs is the PIC, no question about it. Every pilot at Southwest has a 737 PIC type, including FO's. The FO never signs or logs PIC, because the "C" in PIC is never met.
Never flew part 91. In fact the bulk of my time is Military Heavy Time, which could start another 25 page debate on how to log. If you took more than a cursory view of the argument, "logging" PIC is different from "acting" as PIC. A quite lengthy FSDO explanation has already been re-posted on this thread that I suggest you review before attempting to argue further. We've seen this thread too many times to simply accept your "shoot from the hip" point of view on the "C" in PIC. The PIC column in your logbook has nothing to do with who was in command...in fact, it's a bit of a misnomer; the column on your employment application probably does require "command", it's important to know the difference.
Part 121 does not govern your logbook. Half the guys in 121 no longer keep a logbook.
As for the moderator comment..I am not a moderator here because of my vast knowledge of all facets of aviation and the ins and outs of our FARs. I did not sit in front of a panel or even have an interview. I am just a guy who volunteers around here to keep this forum clean of terms of service violations. If you insult another member, post something inappropriate, or just generally become a nuisance I will moderate. I am wrong quite often...just ask my wife.
#28
There's also a difference between "Legal" and "This is a good idea," just to be clear. I just hate blanket statements that you "can not" and "never" that are misleading.
Part 2 of the argument:
How are the Regionals upgrading 100's of Captains a year that don't have the requisite PIC time for an ATP? I know they're counting their SIC time as "PIC Time" towards it (i.e. every other leg), even though the pilots are not logging it that way in their Logbooks...what is the legal citation for this or is it covered in Ops Specs?
Part 2 of the argument:
How are the Regionals upgrading 100's of Captains a year that don't have the requisite PIC time for an ATP? I know they're counting their SIC time as "PIC Time" towards it (i.e. every other leg), even though the pilots are not logging it that way in their Logbooks...what is the legal citation for this or is it covered in Ops Specs?
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Position: Doing what you do, for less.
Posts: 1,792
What it comes down to is logging a few hours of PIC isn't going to change anything.
You're either going to get that dream job with 300 hours TPIC or 3000 hours of it. Nobody is sitting around waiting to 1000 and then getting called by a major. You're either like most people who have a job supplying them with all the turbine PIC they could ever need and just waiting for the major to call.... or you are one of the few who has some short of amazing item on your resume or connection at the company that you'll get called no matter how little TPIC you have.
Log it the legit way and you'll get a job when you get it.
You're either going to get that dream job with 300 hours TPIC or 3000 hours of it. Nobody is sitting around waiting to 1000 and then getting called by a major. You're either like most people who have a job supplying them with all the turbine PIC they could ever need and just waiting for the major to call.... or you are one of the few who has some short of amazing item on your resume or connection at the company that you'll get called no matter how little TPIC you have.
Log it the legit way and you'll get a job when you get it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post