Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Conflict of Interest? (XJT pilots march) >

Conflict of Interest? (XJT pilots march)

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Conflict of Interest? (XJT pilots march)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2010, 06:08 PM
  #1  
On Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 15
Default Conflict of Interest? (XJT pilots march)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but if pilots from XJT are marching to protest UAL's outsourcing of regional jet flying, as the article states below, would this not be a conflict of interest? Now that ASA owns XJT, and ASA operates 70+ seat jets, it appears that if anyone from ASA/XJT picketing at these events is in direct conflict of their own employer.

From ALPA:
"More than 150 pilots converged on United Air Lines’ World Headquarters on Wednesday to express their displeasure with United’s continued practice of outsourcing. Braving a chilly, snowy Chicago day, the pilots walked in four orbits during the two-hour picketing event. United and Continental pilots were joined by their brethren from Delta, American, Mesa, AirTran, and ExpressJet.
United management intends to use the CO code on flights from Continental hubs, using outsourced 70-seat jets..."

And why is Mesa involved?
187fw is offline  
Old 12-06-2010, 06:15 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
fjetter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: King Air 200 CA Hawker 800/900 FO
Posts: 810
Default

I hope its because these guys recognize the need to limit scope to help protect any future of this profession.
fjetter is offline  
Old 12-06-2010, 06:19 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,536
Default

They're marching for the same reason Forrest Gump spoke at an anti-war rally...

To get the chicks.
Boomer is offline  
Old 12-06-2010, 07:02 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
DASH8EE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 32
Default

They probably want to help save whats left of mainline flying. So hopefully one day they can fly bigger airplanes, better yet fly for a company that will pay them what they are worth. Its not regional pilot against mainline pilot. We have to realize we are all in the same baot.
DASH8EE is offline  
Old 12-06-2010, 07:35 PM
  #5  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by DASH8EE
They probably want to help save whats left of mainline flying. So hopefully one day they can fly bigger airplanes, better yet fly for a company that will pay them what they are worth. Its not regional pilot against mainline pilot. We have to realize we are all in the same baot.
Bingo. They are supporting the end of backsliding in this industry and preservation of big money/good career jobs!

All the ALPA's should be standing firmly behind this.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 05:49 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DashDriverYV's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: back in the right
Posts: 406
Default

Originally Posted by 187fw
Correct me if I'm wrong, but if pilots from XJT are marching to protest UAL's outsourcing of regional jet flying, as the article states below, would this not be a conflict of interest? Now that ASA owns XJT, and ASA operates 70+ seat jets, it appears that if anyone from ASA/XJT picketing at these events is in direct conflict of their own employer.

From ALPA:
"More than 150 pilots converged on United Air Lines’ World Headquarters on Wednesday to express their displeasure with United’s continued practice of outsourcing. Braving a chilly, snowy Chicago day, the pilots walked in four orbits during the two-hour picketing event. United and Continental pilots were joined by their brethren from Delta, American, Mesa, AirTran, and ExpressJet.
United management intends to use the CO code on flights from Continental hubs, using outsourced 70-seat jets..."

And why is Mesa involved?
Mesa is involved because you could learn a thing or two.
While all other airlines focused on getting higher pay, Mesa was up against the most anti union management in the industry since Lorenzo. And while every one else increased their pay, Mesa pilots stood the line and fought for the toughest scope language in the entire industry, something that every one else could have done.
So while you supposedly know that all Mesa pilots must be bottom feeding scum, they all know what it is like to fight management. We know what it is like to sacrifice for the profession and our jobs, not just pay.
DashDriverYV is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 06:09 AM
  #7  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Mesa Pilots fought off JO & his 737's. It took serious guts, & we should all be grateful to those who took that stand.

On topic, XJET pilots don't have a conflict of interest. They have an interest in salvaging their careers & stopping the backslide. Skywest may own them, but they don't operate 70 seaters on their certificate, and Skywest management is not on a hurry to help ExpressJet pilots so why should ExpressJet pilots help them? I'm glad to see XE pilots supporting their ALPA brothers & sisters, unity is all we have left, & sometimes it looks like that's going too.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 06:28 AM
  #8  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,107
Default

Originally Posted by DashDriverYV
Mesa pilots must be bottom feeding scum, they all know what it is like to fight management. We know what it is like to sacrifice for the profession and our jobs, not just pay.[/SIZE][/FONT]

Originally Posted by johnso29
Mesa Pilots fought off JO & his 737's. It took serious guts, & we should all be grateful to those who took that stand.
We should be grateful. But that was a long time ago and the vast majority of those pilots are long gone...hopefully the current crop of mesa pilots will continue in that tradition once things settle down, especially the 411. I suspect many of them have lived and learned over the past couple years.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 08:18 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
We should be grateful. But that was a long time ago and the vast majority of those pilots are long gone...hopefully the current crop of mesa pilots will continue in that tradition once things settle down, especially the 411. I suspect many of them have lived and learned over the past couple years.
Agreed. I also was referring to the specific Mesa pilots who took a stand, rather then the current Mesa pilot group. (Although some of the current Mesa pilot group was probably involved)
johnso29 is offline  
Old 12-07-2010, 09:37 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
We should be grateful. But that was a long time ago and the vast majority of those pilots are long gone...hopefully the current crop of mesa pilots will continue in that tradition once things settle down, especially the 411. I suspect many of them have lived and learned over the past couple years.
Thats CBA was signed in the spring of 2003.

If the APC numbers are correct on the current junior CA's, that means that every CLT, IAD, ORD, and PHX CA was on property at that time.

"Vast majority" is probably a stretch as to the numbers of who's left to remember that whole 737 thing
dojetdriver is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nevets
Major
2
06-14-2010 10:00 PM
WatchThis!
Regional
63
07-11-2008 09:52 AM
CAL EWR
Major
11
02-26-2008 11:35 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
04-29-2005 07:26 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices