ASA (SkyWest, Inc) officially is buying XJT
#121
I think you would also be the 4th largest pilot group in ALPA which comes with some clout. I think it will be DAL, UAL/CAL, FDX, then SKYW if you could all be on one list. I wonder how Jerry will feel about that?
#122
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: emb-145 ca
Posts: 212
No. You are mis-reading this language. The 9 months refers to going to arbitration for a CBA (a common contract). This assumes the seniority list merger has already been settled. The seniority merger has 12 months to be agreed upon between the pilot groups themselves. If no agreement is settled after 12 months of talking internally within the pilot groups, then the list problem gets sent to arbitration. They are 2 completely different issues. The 3rd issue is XJT MEC will file for one list among the 3 companies, not just between ASA and XJT, or they may need to practice hiding their badges from view for the rest of their careers.
The language we have for single pilot list under the holding company will end up in court, I am sure. It has always been the intent of XJT pilots to avoid a whipsaw set-up. If our contract and ALPA legal cannot make our contract stick on this, then we may as well just give up on the concept of CBAs altoghether. SkyWest will have to prove that they are not really the company buying XJT, ASA is. Seems like a long stretch of the truth to me.
Also, for everybody saying XJT has the best vacation yada yada, well just remember a new joint CBA will be negotiated and freaking EVERYTHING in that new CBA is up for rewriting. May keep a lot of it, may lose some. We'll see.
#123
The new rule does not count non-votes as yes votes...it only votes which are actually cast (yes or no).
Previously non-votes counted as no votes. All the rule does is remove the apathetic from the equation (as it should be). But that does not mean all the non-voters from last time were apathetic...for many a non-vote was simply a no vote, and I'm sure those folks would actually call in to vote if that is required (there are some apathetic types, but not 66% of the pilot group).
#124
#125
The ASA MEC was informed, and placed under a confidentiality agreement until the announcement was official. I know this first hand. So it wouldn't surprise me if a handshake agreement already took place regarding the integration. There's no way Jerry Atkin would do this without promises from the pilot unions to play nice. He would never have another US Airways.
#126
Line Holder
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: CRJ
Posts: 68
We had one near the fraternity in school...we called it the Kentacohut....
#127
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Not likely, the reasons have been already covered
If they haven't already.
But consider this; when you look beyond the sheer numbers, at which pay scales is the 2ish% more? The legacy/freight, or the "regionals"? 'Nuff said.
#129
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2010
Posts: 39
SKW does not see that as "killing them"...they have been resigned to the fact that a union is coming eventually for several years now.
The new rule does not count non-votes as yes votes...it only votes which are actually cast (yes or no).
Previously non-votes counted as no votes. All the rule does is remove the apathetic from the equation (as it should be). But that does not mean all the non-voters from last time were apathetic...for many a non-vote was simply a no vote, and I'm sure those folks would actually call in to vote if that is required (there are some apathetic types, but not 66% of the pilot group).
The new rule does not count non-votes as yes votes...it only votes which are actually cast (yes or no).
Previously non-votes counted as no votes. All the rule does is remove the apathetic from the equation (as it should be). But that does not mean all the non-voters from last time were apathetic...for many a non-vote was simply a no vote, and I'm sure those folks would actually call in to vote if that is required (there are some apathetic types, but not 66% of the pilot group).
Last edited by C5Pilot; 08-04-2010 at 01:47 PM.
#130
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
The ASA MEC was informed, and placed under a confidentiality agreement until the announcement was official. I know this first hand. So it wouldn't surprise me if a handshake agreement already took place regarding the integration. There's no way Jerry Atkin would do this without promises from the pilot unions to play nice. He would never have another US Airways.
Handshake agreement with whom? I was notified of this deal 3 weeks ago and bound by a confidentiality agreement as well. There is a lot that needs to be looked through before the deal is "done". There is a potential to have a very strong unified pilot group, it's only a matter of time until Skywest becomes ALPA.
As a member of the XJT MEC I can assure you no one on our end made a "deal" with anyone. If this deal does not look to a be a good one for XJT pilots, you can bet your ass every single one of us on the MEC will do whatever we can to change that..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post