Eagle Life
06-02-2012, 05:34 PM
#5691
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
what have you been doing to help the pilot group?? besides trying to scare people with AMR rules, that rules written by this management team.
06-02-2012, 11:31 PM
#5692
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
what we have here is a failure to communicate.
MASON32 is correct.
What is against the FAR's is that as PIC you failed to log in the maintenance log book an aircraft discrepncy and carried the aircraft for a few legs or that the SIC failed to mention a discrepency to the PIC. What is against the company policy is to violate any far's and to be unsafe in your performance as PIC or SIC.
Now is that more clear.
Hell, in ORD the pilots deice aircraft just because the atis says flurries but it is clear skies. Comply with FMP-1. First you have to read it.
MASON32 is correct.
What is against the FAR's is that as PIC you failed to log in the maintenance log book an aircraft discrepncy and carried the aircraft for a few legs or that the SIC failed to mention a discrepency to the PIC. What is against the company policy is to violate any far's and to be unsafe in your performance as PIC or SIC.
Now is that more clear.
Hell, in ORD the pilots deice aircraft just because the atis says flurries but it is clear skies. Comply with FMP-1. First you have to read it.
06-03-2012, 06:54 AM
#5693
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
06-03-2012, 06:59 AM
#5694
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
06-03-2012, 07:00 AM
#5695
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 820
what we have here is a failure to communicate.
MASON32 is correct.
What is against the FAR's is that as PIC you failed to log in the maintenance log book an aircraft discrepncy and carried the aircraft for a few legs or that the SIC failed to mention a discrepency to the PIC. What is against the company policy is to violate any far's and to be unsafe in your performance as PIC or SIC.
Now is that more clear.
Hell, in ORD the pilots deice aircraft just because the atis says flurries but it is clear skies. Comply with FMP-1. First you have to read it.
MASON32 is correct.
What is against the FAR's is that as PIC you failed to log in the maintenance log book an aircraft discrepncy and carried the aircraft for a few legs or that the SIC failed to mention a discrepency to the PIC. What is against the company policy is to violate any far's and to be unsafe in your performance as PIC or SIC.
Now is that more clear.
Hell, in ORD the pilots deice aircraft just because the atis says flurries but it is clear skies. Comply with FMP-1. First you have to read it.
can you tell me what you were talking about??
06-06-2012, 03:05 PM
#5696
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: CRJ700 F/O
Posts: 354
So I saw via the Eagle ALPA Facebook page that we can email some guy to find out our in-base P2P rep -- and get info on our counter proposal..anyone else try the same thing or get a response? I'm still waiting...guess my meager FO-salary union dues aren't good enough to get a quick reply...
06-07-2012, 07:08 AM
#5698
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 366
Anyone else notice this on yesterdays Eaglewire:
From Aviation Week
EMBRAER EXPECTS FLOOD OF LARGE REGIONAL JET ORDERS FROM U.S. CARRIERS
Expected changes to AMR Corp.’s scope clause provision with its American Airlines pilots should result in large orders from U.S. carriers, said Embraer’s President for Commercial Aviation. He said that American will place a “huge order” in the next year, noting “this will be the driver” for others, including Delta Air Lines – which is ridding its regional feed of many 50-seat jets – to seek more regional jets in the 70-plus size range, which includes Embraer’s E-175 airframe.
From Aviation Week
EMBRAER EXPECTS FLOOD OF LARGE REGIONAL JET ORDERS FROM U.S. CARRIERS
Expected changes to AMR Corp.’s scope clause provision with its American Airlines pilots should result in large orders from U.S. carriers, said Embraer’s President for Commercial Aviation. He said that American will place a “huge order” in the next year, noting “this will be the driver” for others, including Delta Air Lines – which is ridding its regional feed of many 50-seat jets – to seek more regional jets in the 70-plus size range, which includes Embraer’s E-175 airframe.
06-07-2012, 07:41 AM
#5699
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 562
Anyone else notice this on yesterdays Eaglewire:
From Aviation Week
EMBRAER EXPECTS FLOOD OF LARGE REGIONAL JET ORDERS FROM U.S. CARRIERS
Expected changes to AMR Corp.’s scope clause provision with its American Airlines pilots should result in large orders from U.S. carriers, said Embraer’s President for Commercial Aviation. He said that American will place a “huge order” in the next year, noting “this will be the driver” for others, including Delta Air Lines – which is ridding its regional feed of many 50-seat jets – to seek more regional jets in the 70-plus size range, which includes Embraer’s E-175 airframe.
From Aviation Week
EMBRAER EXPECTS FLOOD OF LARGE REGIONAL JET ORDERS FROM U.S. CARRIERS
Expected changes to AMR Corp.’s scope clause provision with its American Airlines pilots should result in large orders from U.S. carriers, said Embraer’s President for Commercial Aviation. He said that American will place a “huge order” in the next year, noting “this will be the driver” for others, including Delta Air Lines – which is ridding its regional feed of many 50-seat jets – to seek more regional jets in the 70-plus size range, which includes Embraer’s E-175 airframe.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
