Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Majors vs. Regional Contracts and Work Rules >

Majors vs. Regional Contracts and Work Rules

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Majors vs. Regional Contracts and Work Rules

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2010, 06:34 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,197
Default Majors vs. Regional Contracts and Work Rules

We should propose that any regional owned or doing business for a major airline should share the same work rules as the major airline. If you are owned by Delta as a subsidiary, then you would fly by Delta's contract and work rules. If you fly for multiple Major carriers, then you would still be governed by the Major that you are doing business for.

The same thing with the training departments. I think if you are flying for Delta, then Delta should be designing your training department and also overseeing it.

After all, the Major airlines always say that the training at the regional level is no different and that we are all held to the same standard. If that is the case then why don't we do this?
TurboDog is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 06:42 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Posts: 206
Default

+1.

I agree. Now if only we can get a legislation drafted for this idea...
StrikeTime is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 07:54 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: LCA, A&P, IA
Posts: 58
Default

How about "One level of safety" for everyone. Alot of us fly feed for a couple different legacy airlines, sometimes in the same day. Make it the same for everyone.
thndr8 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 08:12 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

That's more of an ALPA/Union thing I think. Why if I work under the union named ALPA as a contractor is it that I'm treated differently by each airline I work for? That makes no sense. Pipe layers, electricians, steel workers, machinists, etc all seem to have the same pay, and work rules no matter who they work for as long as they pay their dues to the same union. In fact I think (don't quote me") that these union workers are phrohibited from working for less than bargained for to avoid undercutting. I'm not sure if this applies to independent contractors. Of course these guys get to choose which ever union they want to use and we are forced to be part of a union and have no choice what so ever. Pretty convenient if you ask me.

I guess we have no one to blame but ourselves. So we can talk about it on a forum all day but unless someone truly takes a stand, nothing will ever come close to changing.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 08:16 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 122
Default

Hell no, XJT for the most part, has much better language. Perhaps when CAL gets their new and improved contract
Washout is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 01:40 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cal73's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: 737 Captain
Posts: 872
Default

Originally Posted by Washout
Hell no, XJT for the most part, has much better language. Perhaps when CAL gets their new and improved contract
I LOL'ed and then I got sad..
cal73 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 01:59 PM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 50
Default

Originally Posted by Washout
Hell no, XJT for the most part, has much better language. Perhaps when CAL gets their new and improved contract
If you truly believe that XJT has a better contract than CAL, you don't know the first thing about majors. Even though they have lots lots of pay, and pensions, and work rules, it is still much better than any regional contract
caboarder2001 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 02:07 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by caboarder2001
If you truly believe that XJT has a better contract than CAL, you don't know the first thing about majors. Even though they have lots lots of pay, and pensions, and work rules, it is still much better than any regional contract

Interesting. I've known more than one guy that's gone to CAL that's expressed the following views: Does he wish that he could go back to XJT? Of course not. Does his worst day at CAL top his best day at XJT? Of course. When they get past crappy pay, no insurance for six months, and FINALLY catch up on the pay rate they left on, all the more better. But many of them express a similar sentiment. They wish they there were STILL working under XJT's rules.

Especially as it pertains to scheduling/bidding, DPM's, and vacation language.

Everybody's mileage will vary.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 03:56 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 122
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
Interesting. I've known more than one guy that's gone to CAL that's expressed the following views: Does he wish that he could go back to XJT? Of course not. Does his worst day at CAL top his best day at XJT? Of course. When they get past crappy pay, no insurance for six months, and FINALLY catch up on the pay rate they left on, all the more better. But many of them express a similar sentiment. They wish they there were STILL working under XJT's rules.

Especially as it pertains to scheduling/bidding, DPM's, and vacation language.

Everybody's mileage will vary.
What he said...
Washout is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 06:36 AM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,197
Default

Originally Posted by afterburn81
That's more of an ALPA/Union thing I think. Why if I work under the union named ALPA as a contractor is it that I'm treated differently by each airline I work for? That makes no sense. Pipe layers, electricians, steel workers, machinists, etc all seem to have the same pay, and work rules no matter who they work for as long as they pay their dues to the same union. In fact I think (don't quote me") that these union workers are phrohibited from working for less than bargained for to avoid undercutting. I'm not sure if this applies to independent contractors. Of course these guys get to choose which ever union they want to use and we are forced to be part of a union and have no choice what so ever. Pretty convenient if you ask me.

I guess we have no one to blame but ourselves. So we can talk about it on a forum all day but unless someone truly takes a stand, nothing will ever come close to changing.
Good point! Why should there be different work rules because you work for a different company. Work rules for truck drivers don't change just because you leave one trucking company and get hired by another. There should be one set of work rules Industry wide. Not just ALPA. It should be made up of any part 121 carrier in the US. And not just an FAA mandated maximum duty day. It should address everything from calling in Fatigued to reserve schedules. If we leveled the playing field as far as QOL at all US carriers, it would only force pay to go up when airlines start to hire again.
TurboDog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djrogs03
Regional
12
01-17-2010 07:53 PM
Turbinebound
Regional
1
09-12-2009 06:53 PM
colinflyin
Regional
48
09-12-2009 10:21 AM
Turbinebound
Major
4
09-12-2009 08:01 AM
DWN3GRN
Major
18
06-12-2009 04:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices