Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle CA suspended

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2010, 12:06 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hoserpilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: maddoggy dog
Posts: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by Airsupport
I laugh at you guys talking all this freight dog crap. I was a single pilot night ifr guy and I can tell you that doing that type of flying has given me the guts, or whatever you want to call it, to say no. Being a freight dog doesn't make you a better pilot per se, but it helps you make better decisions. You learn really quickly when you have bit off more than you can chew when you are the only one in the plane flying. There are more than a couple flights I can look back on and think to myself, man I should have stayed on the ground. Now that I am a captain with OTHER peoples lives in the back I need to evaluate everything that much more closely. Anyone bringing the freight dog attitude to the airlines is just looking for trouble and when they find it all the people they were entrusted with will pay the price.


You laugh at the single pilot freight dogs eh? Well, anything that gets the person flying, in the weather, and making decisions will help. Sitting in the right seat of a C-152 does not help that but it does prepare you to move on the the next step. Most pilots over the last 7 years have skipped the freight, canyon, and Alaska flying that we all used to do. Good thing the majors have not been hiring. This stagnation will help those with less experience get a few hard winters under their belt. You helped prove my point in your post. Acting as the PIC, flying in the weather, honed your instrument and decision making skills. Good for you. I know I'll be safer non-reving in the back of your plane.
hoserpilot is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:13 PM
  #62  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: A320A
Posts: 45
Default

The following was in a letter of agreement at NWA from 1989 through the last contract:

6. Departure without at least one (1) functioning autopilot shall be at the captain’s discretion. Every effort will be made to effect repairs at the first maintenance base.



From what I read in the original post, it sounds like the Captain made a good decision. This is not a contest to see how great a pilot you are because you've flown without an autopilot before - this is about safety. Apparently the pilots at Northwest thought it important enough to include it in their contract for years.
Foulwx is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:28 PM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: Computer desk
Posts: 118
Default

Originally Posted by 1900luxuryliner
I'm not talking about machoism, or coolness, or manliness. I could not care less about that stuff. I'm not talking about extra time in the sim. All I'm saying is, in preparation for the possibility that the autopilot will fail, or the possibility of it being deferred, being able to hand fly it without worrying about safety being affected does not seem too unreasonable, or crazy, to me. Being able to fly an approach is not too crazy and unreasonable, to me. It doesn't matter if you are trained to do it in the sim, or not. It's called having the ability to fly the airplane in the IFR environment. How is that unreasonable???
Thank you. You said it much better than i could. And for the record. I am not just a "box Hauler". I have lots of 121 experience Flying the 74 Classic to every corner of the earth. And several thousand hours of airbus 320 time. If i didnt feel comfortable hand flying any of these machines at altitude. In the event the "magic" fails in cruise flight. I would tear up my ticket and quit flying. However in this Captains case. If he's dealing with several dmi's, weather suks, non precision app, un familar aerodrome, and fatigue, and so on......... Kudos for pulling the plug if you feel over your head. First rounds on me.

Peace out.

Leardriver
leardriver is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 12:30 PM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ
Posts: 2,356
Default

Originally Posted by hoserpilot
You laugh at the single pilot freight dogs eh? Well, anything that gets the person flying, in the weather, and making decisions will help. Sitting in the right seat of a C-152 does not help that but it does prepare you to move on the the next step. Most pilots over the last 7 years have skipped the freight, canyon, and Alaska flying that we all used to do. Good thing the majors have not been hiring. This stagnation will help those with less experience get a few hard winters under their belt. You helped prove my point in your post. Acting as the PIC, flying in the weather, honed your instrument and decision making skills. Good for you. I know I'll be safer non-reving in the back of your plane.
I agree. Most people didn't have to do that before they got into the industry. What I am laughing at is the people who think that their freight dog days transfer over to airline flying. You know what my freight was. Checks. Lots and lots of checks. And like I said in my previous post I learned more about decision making during that time than I did flying IFR. After flying IFR for so long the skill of actually flying isn't the problem. It is the decision making that is the problem. I could back in the day take a Navajo and fly a single engine ils down to mins in bad weather and wouldn't think much of it. Thats not the point. The point is I shouldn't have taken that Navajo in the first place because the engine had already had to be shut down several times in the last week. And by taking that plane and losing that engine I have greatly narrowed my available alternatives to make sure there is a safe outcome. The times where my gut told me something was wrong, or to not do something, and I did it anyway were the times I realized that the checks werent worth my life and that what I had done nearly cost me everything.

Now my cargo is far more valuable than a bunch of checks. My cargo is moms, dads, brothers, sisters, my wife and kids etc etc. Anytime now that I feel something is not right I dont do it. I used up all my luck flying checks around. Now sound judgement and not taking unecassary risks is my motto. I know my limits. I know when I am biting off more than I can chew and I just dont do it. My passengers may hate me for it as they are giving me dirty looks while we deplane. That is fine. That is what I am asked to do. Be responsible and take charge. My kids dad is on the plane and they expect him to come home safely every time and that is what I intend on doing.

Here is a little story to illustrate my point:

The owner of a trucking company is looking to hire a driver to carry cargo up and down a mountain. The road is narrow and along a cliff. Three guys showed up for the interview and the owner explained to them the conditions and that great skill would be needed to drive the trucks up the narrow mountain passes. The first guy said, "I can drive the car within 6 inches of the ledge, thats how good I am". The next guy said, "Well I can drive the truck within 4 inches of the ledge, thats how good a driver I am." The last guy got the job when he said, "I will stay as far away from the ledge as I can."

Last edited by Airsupport; 02-03-2010 at 12:44 PM.
Airsupport is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 02:16 PM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi
Well since we're saying what we think...

He should have accepted the flight and taken off, hand flown (600 foot ceiling, give me a break, that's easy money), the aircraft was airworthy in every respect and the weather was dispatch-able.

Now, when they got there and attempted their approach and at that point decided that it was either unstable (due to them being not being proficient or the weather being that bad), unable to land due to any other circumstance they should have turned around and come right back, at that point making the PIC decision to do so... I will never question the reason someone turns around and nobody else ever should, however I will question someone who doesn't want to go flying in reasonable weather and in a good airplane when asked to do so. When you sit on the ground several hundred miles away and make the decision that you already know you can't do the flight safely you're sending the signal that you are either unsure of yourself (with or without reason), lazy or just not wanting to do your job, you get paid to fly not come up with invalid reasons not to fly.
I think the issue is some of us have scared the crap out of ourselves using the "just go try it" method. Once you've had several of those," you know I probably should have sat this one out" sort of moments you start to be able to recognize things starting to come together. I guess that's why they always say there's old pilots and there's bold pilots but no old bold pilots.

In 121 you just almost never cancel a flight, I'm sure this captain knew that but was seeing the pieces start to fall into place and said, "No Thanks"
Blueskies21 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 02:53 PM
  #66  
Line Holder
 
8LatRB's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 38
Default

Will a suspension show up on a PRIA?
8LatRB is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 03:03 PM
  #67  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: Window Seat
Posts: 1,430
Default

If all your using is "previous experiences" to made a decision to not attempt a flight then it's time to think about changing to a more predictable job.
aviatorhi is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 03:46 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by 8LatRB
Will a suspension show up on a PRIA?
If you're talking just the suspension, doubt it since PRIA is about training ONLY, not being disciplined or what goes in your personal file at your emloyer.

Now, if for some reason it's determined by the braintrust of flight ops management that the CA has to go to some kind of training for his actions and he bonks it, well, MAYBE that might show up. But I doubt it, and has NOTHING to do with the suspension in the first place. All that is is a hypothetical scenario.

I think the ONLY place where the CA will have to deal with it is if he interviews and the app and/or interviewer asks if the pilot has ever been "disciplined". And just going on what's been provided, it'd probably be a slam dunk on his part as long as he answered the question with the objective facts, states why he did it, and leaves emotion and opinion of PCL management out of it.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 04:18 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Default

Originally Posted by Swedish Blender
I know several people who used to have to hand fly a Lear at 410 from the midwest to the west coast.
That was before RVSM right? If this guy blasted off he would have to stay pretty low under RVSM airspace, right in the weather.

I agree though. He should have just waited it out till the weather cleared.
dbrault17 is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 04:46 PM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 888
Default

Originally Posted by aviatorhi
If all your using is "previous experiences" to made a decision to not attempt a flight then it's time to think about changing to a more predictable job.
Oh, how silly of me, I thought prior experience IS how you make good decisions. My fault, just ignore all prior experience sounds like an AWESOME plan.
Blueskies21 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
laserman2431
Regional
30
02-23-2009 06:56 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Regional
38
10-11-2008 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices