Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle CA suspended

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2010, 02:06 PM
  #121  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

I think all the stud-muffin Chuck Yeagers here who belittle autoflight systems and simultaneously trumpet their hand-flying skills with chest-thumping perfection should join together and petition the FAA to have these embarrassing devices removed. This would allow these new up and coming stallions of the industry to demonstrate their spectacular aeronautical prowess more often, dazzling those pilots they feel inferior and passengers alike to awe-inspiring worship and euphoria.

Maybe they'll get more chicks.....................
eaglefly is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 02:31 PM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
I think all the stud-muffin Chuck Yeagers here who belittle autoflight systems and simultaneously trumpet their hand-flying skills with chest-thumping perfection should join together and petition the FAA to have these embarrassing devices removed. This would allow these new up and coming stallions of the industry to demonstrate their spectacular aeronautical prowess more often, dazzling those pilots they feel inferior and passengers alike to awe-inspiring worship and euphoria.

Maybe they'll get more chicks.....................
I don't think anyone on this thread is belittling automation, nor do I think this thread is an "I can hand-fly better than the autopilot" discussion either. As mentioned earlier, a decision was made based on stated criteria and the bulk of the conversations thus far have centered around the merits of that decision.

The camps seem to be split on whether or not one should accept an aircraft with an inoperative autopilot. As I mentioned earlier, that would depend not only on the individual, but also on the circumstance(s) as well.

If the aircraft is approved to be dispatched with an inoperative autopilot, then it can be operated legally. Is it dangerous to do so? All things being equal, this really should be a non-event for most people.

Now, if the weather is down, the crew has had a long day, and the flight will be operated into very congested airspace, then the PIC must make - and be prepared to defend - his or her decision if the PIC elects not to accept the aircraft. That decision may be based on factors such as fatigue, experience, and proficiency.

Legally, if the aircraft can be dispatched without the autopilot and the weather is such that it does not negatively affect operating within the bounds of that deferral, then the PIC is going to have a tough time defending his decision based solely on the autopilot being deferred. In other words, why is it a safety issue if one must hand fly? That answer depends on the individual and one answer will not suffice for each and every individual.

Some may refuse to accept the aircraft and some may not refuse to accept it. In either case, both may be correct.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 02:37 PM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by Lab Rat

Some may refuse to accept the aircraft and some may not refuse to accept it. In either case, both may be correct.

Were talking Pilots here. They are ALWAYS right
mooney is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 03:31 PM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NEDude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Default

Originally Posted by B317
Let me ask this, If they were 20 minutes into the flight and the A/P quit should they have continued? Many of you seem to think that Capt's Authority means we can't be held accountable for our actions. If a pilot can't hand fly an aircraft for a couple hours, then they need to rethink the profession they have chosen. How many pilots fly everyday in aircraft with no A/P installed? Are those aircraft considered dangerous because of no autopilot?
There is a BIG difference between a MX problem occurring in flight, and one occurring before you even board the aircraft.

But as stated by others, this is not about a pilot being able to fly with an autopilot or not. We do not have all of the information this captain did at the time of his decision. We also do not know how tired the he was, we do not know how competent or fatigued his F/O was. This is about a company trying to erode captains authority. And we should all be appalled at the fact a captain is faced with suspension and forfeiting of pay for exercising his federally granted authority.
NEDude is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 03:49 PM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,023
Default

I didn't have time to read all 13 pages of this thread, but is the suspension related to the ongoing contract negotiations at Pinnacle? A guy I recently flew with had a conversation with a Pinnacle guy and said something like, "Well, eventually you guys will get sick of it and go down the same road we (ASA) did," and the Pinnacle guy said "Oh no, we couldn't do that, management will suspend us if we start writing stuff up."

I wouldn't be surprised if a management pilot came in and did the flight, but I can't believe they got another line guy to take the plane after it had just been refused. Couldn't he find something else to write up? They can suspend one guy, but they can't suspend every guy. (I'm not insinuating this was some kind of job action by the pilot, but that management could be trying to punish that sort of thing)
todd1200 is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 05:08 PM
  #126  
Property of Scheduling
 
higney85's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
Default

I love how every CA is a "he". Interesting to see how it went from "CA" to "he" in a couple pages. Just something I noticed amoungst the discussion.
higney85 is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 05:12 PM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
Were talking Pilots here. They are ALWAYS right
Originally Posted by higney85
I love how every CA is a "he". Interesting to see how it went from "CA" to "he" in a couple pages. Just something I noticed amoungst the discussion.

mine's still a plural transexual.......they
mooney is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 06:03 PM
  #128  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
N271FE's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Posts: 32
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude
But as stated by others...This is about a company trying to erode captains authority. And we should all be appalled at the fact a captain is faced with suspension and forfeiting of pay for exercising his federally granted authority.
As you and countless other folks have stated, this was the sole reason I posted in the first place. It had nothing at all to do with the a/c refusal, but EVERYTHING to do with the suspension/disciplinary action.

Originally Posted by N271FE
...I simply cannot fathom how Pinnacle can completely ignore FAR 91.3, "Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command" and penalize the CA for the decision that was made.
N271FE is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 06:24 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

he is the captain of the airplane. he refused the airplane. end of story. why all this BS about hand flying and this and that and weather and shoulda/coulda/woulda. HE REFUSED THE AIRPLANE! HIS WORD IS GOLD! HES THE CAPTAIN!
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 06:46 PM
  #130  
Reserve for Life
 
Jetrecruiter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: Right Seat for life
Posts: 221
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
he is the captain of the airplane. he refused the airplane. end of story. why all this BS about hand flying and this and that and weather and shoulda/coulda/woulda. HE REFUSED THE AIRPLANE! HIS WORD IS GOLD! HES THE CAPTAIN!
!!!! AMEN !! AMEN !!!! Tell em!
Jetrecruiter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
laserman2431
Regional
30
02-23-2009 06:56 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Regional
38
10-11-2008 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices