Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Pinnacle CA suspended

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2010, 10:15 PM
  #91  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Luv2Rotate's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,498
Default

The guy was the captain and exercised his final authority. Thats it and thats all. No more 300hr wonder nonsense for freight dogs or Lakers do it everyday. He knew his limitations and stood by them. Accept it.
Luv2Rotate is offline  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:22 PM
  #92  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kilgore Trout's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Livin' the dream
Posts: 626
Default

Where were you ten pages ago?
Kilgore Trout is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 05:36 AM
  #93  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 320A
Posts: 333
Default

All the people on this thread puffing up their chests saying how easy it is to hand fly the acft,how many of you hand fly your yearly PC's through the whole check while handling emergencies?Providing the highest level of safety is our job.Late at night,wx,long duty days added to "what if something goes wrong" seems to prove this was a good decision by this capt.
tim123 is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 05:45 AM
  #94  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: A-320
Posts: 6,929
Default

Guys, I mean...................he is saying he is not qualified to do a routine flight without the AutoPilot...........

Its our job, I am not sure I would want to fly with a CA who was not confident enough to handfly in that situation

That being said I RESPECTS HIS DECISION, and don;t think he should have been punished, I just question the CA's ability o FLY an airplane, if anything he should have let the F/O fly?????? Are we not capable?

Not saying this guy can't but it really is alarming how poorly a lot of CA's hand fly airplanes............
JoeyMeatballs is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 07:03 AM
  #95  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

When I was at AWAC, I had a captain (DCA LEC Chairman at the time) refuse an airplane that didn't have an autopilot OR either flight director. We were going to keep the airplane for 3 legs, all about 1.5 in length, all up and down the east coast (DCA-CHS-DCA-PWM, if I recall correctly).

Captain refused the airplane based on safety, saying he didn't think it was safe or prudent to fly an airplane in that congested airspace. As much as AWAC harped on use of automation even then, we both though it was a pilot deviation waiting to happen.

CP got on the horn and told him the MEL was legal and a true professional pilot shouldn't have any problem doing it. The CA told the Chief Pilot if it was so safe then he could bring himself down from Appleton and fly the plane his damn self.

They changed the MELs on the plane so we got the copilot FD back...so I got to hand-fly all 3 legs, all flown at FL270/280.

It wasn't hard, but it wasn't easy and was definitely fatiguing due to the increased concentration involved beyond normal ops with a working AP. I don't think I was ever as tired as I was when we blocked in for the RON that day.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 08:31 AM
  #96  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,108
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
If you're talking just the suspension, doubt it since PRIA is about training ONLY, not being disciplined or what goes in your personal file at your emloyer.
Not entirely true. Discipline related to flight operations (ie violated SOP, FARs, ec) does go into PRIA.

I think things like late for work, insubordination, shoes not shined, etc are excluded. But I think the FAA is trying to include ALL discipline events after colgan (not related to colgan, just part of the backlash against all of us incompetent, lazy, overpaid pilots).
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 08:42 AM
  #97  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,947
Default

Originally Posted by JoeyMeatballs
Guys, I mean...................he is saying he is not qualified to do a routine flight without the AutoPilot...........

Its our job, I am not sure I would want to fly with a CA who was not confident enough to handfly in that situation

That being said I RESPECTS HIS DECISION, and don;t think he should have been punished, I just question the CA's ability o FLY an airplane, if anything he should have let the F/O fly?????? Are we not capable?

Not saying this guy can't but it really is alarming how poorly a lot of CA's hand fly airplanes............
What if he had just returned to the line from 3 months of FMLA due to a new baby? Or a few months medical leave?

And, knowing that, the first trip back was an extremely long duty day in weather with no breaks etc.

So, there can be some other circumstances that would easily make accepting the airplane almost considered wreckless!

On your second point, I agree 100%. Some people really need to click it off earlier and often because I doubt they can even hand fly an ILS to minimums without a flight director and even then they'd be chasing speed GS and LOC the whole way down back and forth.
contrails is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 09:04 AM
  #98  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
That's because it's not a jet.


This captain did the right thing. Although having the AP inop is not cause for declaring an emergency it could be a big problem if you are not proficient. Larger jets have an AP for a reason. Add in the weather, fatigue etc he did the right thing. But it sucks that ironically the crew behind them had to wait for the weather before going so he could have just waited.

You're right...those CRJ's...boy are they scary. Guess larger RJ's have AP's so that all the AirWillies out there can feel safely behind-the-curve.

Attacking the problem here, not the person.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 09:09 AM
  #99  
Gets Weekends Off
 
joepilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: 747 Captain (Ret,)
Posts: 806
Post

I notice that they expected a non-precision approach at destination. Some, not all, major carriers require all non-precision approaches to be flown on autopilot if the weather is below VMC. If the autopilot fails enroute, and only a non-precision approach was available at destination, you would have to divert to a field that had an ILS or VMC conditions, or use your emergency authority and make the safest decision. Note: For something like this, you may be using the emergency authority, but there is no reason to declare an emergency with ATC.

Joe
joepilot is offline  
Old 02-04-2010, 09:10 AM
  #100  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Citation XLS
Posts: 70
Default

Let me ask this, If they were 20 minutes into the flight and the A/P quit should they have continued? Many of you seem to think that Capt's Authority means we can't be held accountable for our actions. If a pilot can't hand fly an aircraft for a couple hours, then they need to rethink the profession they have chosen. How many pilots fly everyday in aircraft with no A/P installed? Are those aircraft considered dangerous because of no autopilot?
B317 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
usmc-sgt
Regional
44
03-11-2012 02:04 PM
laserman2431
Regional
30
02-23-2009 06:56 PM
Windsor
Regional
108
02-04-2009 07:11 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Regional
38
10-11-2008 07:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices