Colgan Hiring....one last time
#111
If Colgan is what you want, DO NOT be patient. Keep calling until you get to talk to somebody.
And to the poster who had a family emergency: keep in touch. Colgan still advertises it has "family values", so if you stood by a loved one in a time of need, let them know. If you REALLY want it, forward some proof that your Mom was sick. It may help.
And to the poster who had a family emergency: keep in touch. Colgan still advertises it has "family values", so if you stood by a loved one in a time of need, let them know. If you REALLY want it, forward some proof that your Mom was sick. It may help.
#112
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Posts: 348
As far as seat locks go, expect a "possible/probable" lock on that equipment/seat for a year. What it boils down to is this:
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
#114
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: In the doghouse
Posts: 136
As far as seat locks go, expect a "possible/probable" lock on that equipment/seat for a year. What it boils down to is this:
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
Thank you.
#115
#116
As far as seat locks go, expect a "possible/probable" lock on that equipment/seat for a year. What it boils down to is this:
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
Let's say you're hired as a Saab FO. You want to be a Q FO. If there is a Q FO position available that you want, and they are currently not hiring, you can probably slide over, one year longevity or not, provided you are the most senior person wanting that slot.
Now let's say you are a Saab FO who wants to be a Q FO, there's a Q FO slot available, but they are hiring. They are going to hire into that Q FO position and leave you where you are, unless you are outside your year seat lock.
It all just boils down to money. It takes money to transition you to the other aircraft. In the first scenario, they were willing to do it, because they needed someone on the Q, and didn't plan to hire anyone else to fill your seat. In the second scenario, why pay for two training events (your transition and the new hire to replace you,) when they can just pay for one (the new hire into the Q slot)?
All that being said, I want to emphasize to any new hires, that you are being paid the same regardless of equipment, and unless you want to be based in EWR, there is really no reason to want the Q. Take the Saab, the movement will be quicker there as there are more senior FOs in the Saab who will upgrade soon. If you are a Q FO, you will have to wait for all those FOs we hired in '08 for the Q to upgrade before you gain any seniority in your seat, which will take longer. There are a lot of '07 hire Saab FOs going for upgrade very, very soon. Take the Saab if you don't want EWR specifically.
#117
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Airbus
Posts: 634
Before you apply at Colgan, watch this please:
FRONTLINE: Coming Soon - Flying Cheap | PBS
It's spot on, we all know that. I am glad to see this company gaining more negative media coverage. Spread the word.
FRONTLINE: Coming Soon - Flying Cheap | PBS
It's spot on, we all know that. I am glad to see this company gaining more negative media coverage. Spread the word.
#118
Before you apply at Colgan, watch this please:
FRONTLINE: Coming Soon - Flying Cheap | PBS
It's spot on, we all know that. I am glad to see this company gaining more negative media coverage. Spread the word.
FRONTLINE: Coming Soon - Flying Cheap | PBS
It's spot on, we all know that. I am glad to see this company gaining more negative media coverage. Spread the word.
thanks?
this has been played out...your just 2 shut down forums too late!
#120
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post