SkyWest Hiring......VLA program suspended
#71
I hope that SkW guys will put perspective in their interactions with other crews. SWA and SKW certainly have almost religion level zeal from many of their employees, the chief difference being the former pays a heck of a lot better.
Then there is the union/non-union thing.
If I'm not mistaken, you were in our previous profession when it was non-union. 1987 comes to mind.
SKW pilots have chosen to remain non-union.
I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA. With ASA and a common list, they'd have plenty of pilots (and ASA ALPA union experience) to make a truly first class SkWAPA. Then, for all the ALPA lovers out there, if that combined group feels that they can get more bang for their buck with IBT or ALPA, or whatever, they could join them.
#72
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA. With ASA and a common list, they'd have plenty of pilots (and ASA ALPA union experience) to make a truly first class SkWAPA. Then, for all the ALPA lovers out there, if that combined group feels that they can get more bang for their buck with IBT or ALPA, or whatever, they could join them.
#73
[quote=rickair7777;733386]
I do not feel there are many options for MAG pilots. No one is hiring, even in other professions.
I give you respect for leaving a situation you hated (Mesa) and making a new situation for yourself. I feel that you cross a line when you disparage your contemporaries that chose to stay or pilots like myself who have come to Mesa after you left. I would find much less to argue with if all you said was, "I hated my time at Mesa, I felt ill-used, I went to SKW, and I enjoy my work life much more."
Piecing together things I believe you said in the past, your theory seems to be that only some kind of useless drone would stick around Mesa. Anyone with anything on the ball would have left and gone to SKW with you.
Someone with another perspective might say that you were a whiney baby the whole time you were at Mesa, couldn't hack it, and went for the sugar tits at SKW. Relax; I do not feel that way about you, I am just positing an extreme example of an alternate explanation of your choice.
They tossed me the keys to a Dash 8 after 4 months with them. Quite respectful, I would say. I never felt treated like an illegal alien. Most of the favors I asked for were granted.
SKW management feels no need or motivation to match union pay rates and work rules won at other carriers? If ASA wins a 12% pay hike, SKW won't match that at the un-Union carrier across the hall?
What would happen if SKW approached the pilot's ASB and said, "Guys we're buying E170's! We're gonna pay you 1/3 less than the union regionals that fly 'em. We need to stay competitive. We're still one big happy family, right...? Guys...? Anyone...?"
The sound of pilots spitting out koolaid would drown out a Kiss concert.
Your company matches pay, benefits, and work rules fought for by Union pilots and the dues they provide.
The Dash Whisperer
I think you get confused when I contrast mesa and SKW...having worked at both, I am qualified to make that comparison. The only reason I waste time talking about it is so that...
2. Current mesa pilots realize that there are better options for them out there.
3. Current MAG pilots who want to stay realize that not all regionals treat their employees like illegal farm workers...they don't have to put up with it.
3. Current MAG pilots who want to stay realize that not all regionals treat their employees like illegal farm workers...they don't have to put up with it.
I give you respect for leaving a situation you hated (Mesa) and making a new situation for yourself. I feel that you cross a line when you disparage your contemporaries that chose to stay or pilots like myself who have come to Mesa after you left. I would find much less to argue with if all you said was, "I hated my time at Mesa, I felt ill-used, I went to SKW, and I enjoy my work life much more."
Piecing together things I believe you said in the past, your theory seems to be that only some kind of useless drone would stick around Mesa. Anyone with anything on the ball would have left and gone to SKW with you.
Someone with another perspective might say that you were a whiney baby the whole time you were at Mesa, couldn't hack it, and went for the sugar tits at SKW. Relax; I do not feel that way about you, I am just positing an extreme example of an alternate explanation of your choice.
If other companies (aviation and non-aviation alike) can provide their employees with a modicum of respect and dignity, why can't JO and his merry band of ass-clowns?
But I paid my alpa dues and got nothing for it so I don't buy into the concept that we owe the rest of the industry dues.
It rubs the wrong way when a mesa pilot talks about SKW "benefiting" from union activity. We may benefit from unions in the abstract, but we sure as heck don't benefit from YOUR union
It rubs the wrong way when a mesa pilot talks about SKW "benefiting" from union activity. We may benefit from unions in the abstract, but we sure as heck don't benefit from YOUR union
What would happen if SKW approached the pilot's ASB and said, "Guys we're buying E170's! We're gonna pay you 1/3 less than the union regionals that fly 'em. We need to stay competitive. We're still one big happy family, right...? Guys...? Anyone...?"
The sound of pilots spitting out koolaid would drown out a Kiss concert.
Your company matches pay, benefits, and work rules fought for by Union pilots and the dues they provide.
The Dash Whisperer
#74
[quote=TonyWilliams;733547]
True. I supported NATCA's efforts to form a Union, voted in favor of its certification, and was a charter member. Not sure what point you were trying to make here.
Any union is better than none, the bigger the union the better.
If I'm not mistaken, you were in our previous profession when it was non-union. 1987 comes to mind.
I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA.
#75
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 90
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Yeah that's the deal but it seems like debating union vs. non-union is what this thread has turned into. I'm just wondering if anyone who applied got an interview yet.
#78
Decent unions do not exist only at carriers with enlightened and wise management. I think you are judging unions by the current state of affairs at their company. You should give credit to the all-out war on employees that too many unions have had to oppose. Sometimes good unions lose fights.
#79
Someone with another perspective might say that you were a whiney baby the whole time you were at Mesa, couldn't hack it, and went for the sugar tits at SKW. Relax; I do not feel that way about you, I am just positing an extreme example of an alternate explanation of your choice.
What I was unable to do was put up with not being accorded basic dignity and respect by my employer. And I certainly learned from the military that unnecessary hacking just for the sake of hacking is pointless. SKW had faster upgrade than mesa at the time, so what would be the point of staying? Unless you were afraid of flunking new-hire training...
Had more to do with self-respect than non-hacking
Now I do recall hearing that the dash community was often it's own little world, and not always subject to the same crap the jet guys had to deal with. I suspect you could have had a different experience at some level.
Like I keep saying, I am pro union (reluctantly). But I said that SKW does not owe anything to MAG ALPA. I agree that SKW has benefited from the historical presence of unions in the industry.
#80
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post