Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SkyWest Hiring......VLA program suspended >

SkyWest Hiring......VLA program suspended

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SkyWest Hiring......VLA program suspended

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2009, 02:25 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Exclamation

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
The vibe I get from SWA folks is, "I am really lucky to be at a great company, especially now." The vibe I get from some SKW folks is, "I work at a great company, my life is great, your life sucks."

I hope that SkW guys will put perspective in their interactions with other crews. SWA and SKW certainly have almost religion level zeal from many of their employees, the chief difference being the former pays a heck of a lot better.


Then there is the union/non-union thing.

If I'm not mistaken, you were in our previous profession when it was non-union. 1987 comes to mind.


SKW pilots have chosen to remain non-union.

I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA. With ASA and a common list, they'd have plenty of pilots (and ASA ALPA union experience) to make a truly first class SkWAPA. Then, for all the ALPA lovers out there, if that combined group feels that they can get more bang for their buck with IBT or ALPA, or whatever, they could join them.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 04:51 PM
  #72  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA. With ASA and a common list, they'd have plenty of pilots (and ASA ALPA union experience) to make a truly first class SkWAPA. Then, for all the ALPA lovers out there, if that combined group feels that they can get more bang for their buck with IBT or ALPA, or whatever, they could join them.
Or with ASA and a combined list, they'd have plenty of pilots (and ASA ALPA union experience) to make a truly first class SWALPA. Then, for all the independent union lovers out there, if that combined group feels that they can get more bang for their buck with SkWAPA or whatever, they could join them. See how that works? Either way you have the same people who are responsible for what makes the union but with ALPA you get all their resources as well.
Nevets is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 05:37 PM
  #73  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheDashRocks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Posts: 305
Default

[quote=rickair7777;733386]
I think you get confused when I contrast mesa and SKW...having worked at both, I am qualified to make that comparison. The only reason I waste time talking about it is so that...
2. Current mesa pilots realize that there are better options for them out there.

3. Current MAG pilots who want to stay realize that not all regionals treat their employees like illegal farm workers...they don't have to put up with it.
I do not feel there are many options for MAG pilots. No one is hiring, even in other professions.

I give you respect for leaving a situation you hated (Mesa) and making a new situation for yourself. I feel that you cross a line when you disparage your contemporaries that chose to stay or pilots like myself who have come to Mesa after you left. I would find much less to argue with if all you said was, "I hated my time at Mesa, I felt ill-used, I went to SKW, and I enjoy my work life much more."

Piecing together things I believe you said in the past, your theory seems to be that only some kind of useless drone would stick around Mesa. Anyone with anything on the ball would have left and gone to SKW with you.

Someone with another perspective might say that you were a whiney baby the whole time you were at Mesa, couldn't hack it, and went for the sugar tits at SKW. Relax; I do not feel that way about you, I am just positing an extreme example of an alternate explanation of your choice.

If other companies (aviation and non-aviation alike) can provide their employees with a modicum of respect and dignity, why can't JO and his merry band of ass-clowns?
They tossed me the keys to a Dash 8 after 4 months with them. Quite respectful, I would say. I never felt treated like an illegal alien. Most of the favors I asked for were granted.

But I paid my alpa dues and got nothing for it so I don't buy into the concept that we owe the rest of the industry dues.

It rubs the wrong way when a mesa pilot talks about SKW "benefiting" from union activity. We may benefit from unions in the abstract, but we sure as heck don't benefit from YOUR union
SKW management feels no need or motivation to match union pay rates and work rules won at other carriers? If ASA wins a 12% pay hike, SKW won't match that at the un-Union carrier across the hall?

What would happen if SKW approached the pilot's ASB and said, "Guys we're buying E170's! We're gonna pay you 1/3 less than the union regionals that fly 'em. We need to stay competitive. We're still one big happy family, right...? Guys...? Anyone...?"

The sound of pilots spitting out koolaid would drown out a Kiss concert.

Your company matches pay, benefits, and work rules fought for by Union pilots and the dues they provide.

The Dash Whisperer
TheDashRocks is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 05:42 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TheDashRocks's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: DHC-8 CA Furloughed
Posts: 305
Default

[quote=TonyWilliams;733547]

If I'm not mistaken, you were in our previous profession when it was non-union. 1987 comes to mind.
True. I supported NATCA's efforts to form a Union, voted in favor of its certification, and was a charter member. Not sure what point you were trying to make here.

I sincerely hope they don't end up with ALPA.
Any union is better than none, the bigger the union the better.
TheDashRocks is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 06:46 PM
  #75  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 90
Default

Originally Posted by PSACFI
Has anyone been given an interview yet?
If skyw is planning on offering the positions to UAL furloughees, then ASA furloughees (120ish people), then the skyw pool (120+ people), I don't see them offering off-the-street interviews anytime soon... right?
friendlyskies is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 06:53 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Newty's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 129
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
and went for the sugar tits at SKW.
Hang on now, I've been here at Skywaste for 2 years, can someone PLEASE point me in the direction of these "Sugar Tits"
Newty is offline  
Old 12-27-2009, 08:04 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Posts: 172
Default

Originally Posted by friendlyskies
If skyw is planning on offering the positions to UAL furloughees, then ASA furloughees (120ish people), then the skyw pool (120+ people), I don't see them offering off-the-street interviews anytime soon... right?
Yeah that's the deal but it seems like debating union vs. non-union is what this thread has turned into. I'm just wondering if anyone who applied got an interview yet.
PSACFI is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 06:21 AM
  #78  
Line Holder
 
JumpSeater's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
Decent unions do not exist only at carriers with enlightened and wise management. I think you are judging unions by the current state of affairs at their company. You should give credit to the all-out war on employees that too many unions have had to oppose. Sometimes good unions lose fights.
Very true.
JumpSeater is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 07:17 AM
  #79  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,108
Default

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
Piecing together things I believe you said in the past, your theory seems to be that only some kind of useless drone would stick around Mesa. Anyone with anything on the ball would have left and gone to SKW with you.
There are good reasons for sticking with mesa...if you love to fly more than anything and have some personal situation which precludes leaving. But most people who work there don't have to stay in the long term.

Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
Someone with another perspective might say that you were a whiney baby the whole time you were at Mesa, couldn't hack it, and went for the sugar tits at SKW. Relax; I do not feel that way about you, I am just positing an extreme example of an alternate explanation of your choice.
Nobody who knows me would think that for a moment. My pre-aviation includes of military service in specialties which are often used as the very definition of "hacking it".

What I was unable to do was put up with not being accorded basic dignity and respect by my employer. And I certainly learned from the military that unnecessary hacking just for the sake of hacking is pointless. SKW had faster upgrade than mesa at the time, so what would be the point of staying? Unless you were afraid of flunking new-hire training...

Had more to do with self-respect than non-hacking

Now I do recall hearing that the dash community was often it's own little world, and not always subject to the same crap the jet guys had to deal with. I suspect you could have had a different experience at some level.


Originally Posted by TheDashRocks
SKW management feels no need or motivation to match union pay rates and work rules won at other carriers? If ASA wins a 12% pay hike, SKW won't match that at the un-Union carrier across the hall?
Like I keep saying, I am pro union (reluctantly). But I said that SKW does not owe anything to MAG ALPA. I agree that SKW has benefited from the historical presence of unions in the industry.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-28-2009, 07:21 AM
  #80  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,108
Default

Originally Posted by Newty
Hang on now, I've been here at Skywaste for 2 years, can someone PLEASE point me in the direction of these "Sugar Tits"
Reserve at SKW is certainly no walk in the park, but the SAP leadership is trying to rewrite the reserve rules to improve that.
rickair7777 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
papacharlie
Regional
71
01-08-2010 08:26 AM
lifter123
Hiring News
0
09-08-2009 03:30 PM
jaded
Regional
29
03-09-2009 03:20 PM
Waldo11
Regional
79
03-09-2009 03:18 PM
find a way
Regional
93
03-09-2009 03:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices