Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

9L vs C5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2009, 11:57 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChipChelios's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 599
Default

My .02 is the SAAB will go the way of the doto bird and will never be replaced. I bet in 5-10 years we will be an all Q400 fleet. EAS stuff that the Q400 is too much airplane for, they will dump. (just my prediction)

There are people who have been watching the Q's performance and magic money making capabilities. There is alot of interest. All I'm going to say is, there are going to be alot of Canadians buying new cars and homes in the next few years.

For all those who are about to chime in with "wah wah, pay" or "wah wah, bottom feeders", the pay scale will be taken care of! Soon.
ChipChelios is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 01:03 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,530
Default

Originally Posted by ChipChelios
I wonder if computer nerds use code to communicate on their message boards
Aviation nerds do at airliners.net

Using airline codes to communicate is a little tacky, spend an extra second and say the actual name.
Purpleanga is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 01:55 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mooney's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CL-65 captain
Posts: 2,244
Default

Guys we have learned probably 20,000 aviation acronyms/abbreviations since we started flying. Everything from systems to weather reports to LEO's. Is reading/learning 10 more airline codes a year on a gossip board in your free time really going to kill you? Why don't we tell the FAA to do away with weather codes and have everything as it is for Grandma on the local news at 6 pm while we're at it?

all this discusion even when the OP says in plain english who the 2 airlines are if you actually read his post....
mooney is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 03:57 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
crazyjaydawg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Middle Seat
Posts: 1,229
Default

Originally Posted by mooney
Guys we have learned probably 20,000 aviation acronyms/abbreviations since we started flying. Everything from systems to weather reports to LEO's. Is reading/learning 10 more airline codes a year on a gossip board in your free time really going to kill you? Why don't we tell the FAA to do away with weather codes and have everything as it is for Grandma on the local news at 6 pm while we're at it?

all this discusion even when the OP says in plain english who the 2 airlines are if you actually read his post....
thank you for bringing some sense to the matter
crazyjaydawg is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 05:18 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AxialFlow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 519
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
Okay, I'll bite. What is the other 34-40 seat airframe?
Word on the street is that Bombardier is firing up the -200/-300 product line at the behest of an unknown party. You connect the dots.
AxialFlow is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 06:23 PM
  #26  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by ChipChelios
My .02 is the SAAB will go the way of the doto bird and will never be replaced. I bet in 5-10 years we will be an all Q400 fleet. EAS stuff that the Q400 is too much airplane for, they will dump. (just my prediction)

There are people who have been watching the Q's performance and magic money making capabilities. There is alot of interest. All I'm going to say is, there are going to be alot of Canadians buying new cars and homes in the next few years.

For all those who are about to chime in with "wah wah, pay" or "wah wah, bottom feeders", the pay scale will be taken care of! Soon.
Saabs may be Dodo birds (Dodo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), but 30ish pax turboprops are not. Some routes support 6 pax (enter Cape Air), some support 30 (Brasillia, Saab, Jetstream), and some support 70 (Q400).

Unless you are saying Colgan will just abandon the 30 pax market... possible, but if there is a replacement aircraft, hard to believe.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 06:56 PM
  #27  
Furlough line holder
 
andy171773's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: CRJ2, ATR, CRJ7, E145, 737
Posts: 1,845
Default

Originally Posted by Jamers
It's like when H7 took over S39's flying.
set hut hut
andy171773 is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 07:12 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ChipChelios's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Posts: 599
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
Saabs may be Dodo birds (Dodo - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), but 30ish pax turboprops are not. Some routes support 6 pax (enter Cape Air), some support 30 (Brasillia, Saab, Jetstream), and some support 70 (Q400).

Unless you are saying Colgan will just abandon the 30 pax market... possible, but if there is a replacement aircraft, hard to believe.

We will see. Right now, there is no replacement being built. I wonder if SAAB would tool back up if someone kicked up an order large enough. Not enough demand right now! Anything can happen in 5-10 years from now.

I would love to see a new and improved SAAB, crisp on the controls, fast, able to leap tall mountains on a single engine...with a nice cup holder too.
ChipChelios is offline  
Old 12-14-2009, 08:35 PM
  #29  
Moderator
 
usmc-sgt's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,966
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH
Okay, I'll bite. What is the other 34-40 seat airframe?
As heard in recurrent from a reliable source first hand (you know how that goes) ATR-42s off the assembly line.
usmc-sgt is offline  
Old 12-15-2009, 02:59 AM
  #30  
I'm a man of my word.
 
CaptainCarl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Devil's Advocate
Posts: 2,883
Default

Originally Posted by ChipChelios
I wonder if computer nerds use code to communicate on their message boards
01010011 01101111 01101101 01100101 01110100 01101001 01101101 01100101 01110011 00100000 00111010 01010000
CaptainCarl is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices