Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Randy Babbitt.... don't backtrack >

Randy Babbitt.... don't backtrack

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Randy Babbitt.... don't backtrack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2009, 12:04 PM
  #31  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by SrfNFly227
How can you make this statement when the Captain of 3407 was hired with less than 1500 hours. People love to point to his total time and then say that he was high time. What you are missing is that a 1500 hour requirement would have kept him from being hired at the time that he was. I can't find the exact number, but if I remember right, he started flying for Gulfstream with under 500 hours and then was hired at Colgan with under 1000.

Other notable crashes with flight crew who were under 1500 hours when hired:

Pinnacle 4712: Captain total time 5600 (1400 when hired)
Pinnacle 3701: FO total time 761 (549 when hired)
Air Midwest 5481: Captain total time 2790 (925 when hired, 1690 at upgrade)
Air Midwest 5481: FO total time 1096 (390 when hired)

I hope you realize that the AMW crash was due to improper control rigging by the mechanic. And by the way, yes total time does play a role. Should we all assume that the 747 CA that was hired with 200 hours back in the day will crash his airplane? Along with the thousands that were hired with less than 1500. That's what your post says. The FO had 1700 total at the time of hire as a CFI and she still put the flaps up at 20 degree up with airspeed at about 80 knots.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 12:59 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Window_Seat's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 389
Default

He crashed because he wasn't competent the fundamentals. Wasn't comfortable with stalls. That is to be learned in the very beginning, and mastered while a CFI. The guy didn't know how to recover from stalls. Important skill as a pilot. Colgan overlooked a lot of the guys history because they needed people to work at the level they were willing to pay. He was willing and eventually, in their opinion, a future captain. Colgan couldn't be selective. Guessing he probably didn't practice too much stall recovery at Gulfstream. Both these pilots went to Colgan for the quick upgrade then to move on to make the big bucks, the FO said it herself on the tapes. That is the real problem: shortcuts. Everyone wants the quick way to the money that we have been told would be waiting for us "if we pay our dues." Most of us are flying the big jets right now (70-90 seaters). This could be it folks.



Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I fail to see your point.

He didn't crash the airplane when he was below 1500 hours, and got thousands of hours in Colgan airplanes in the Colgan system between hire and when the plane went down.

Delaying his hire until he had more than 1500 hours, using your example, is no guarantee that he wouldn't have still screwed the pooch on a simple stall recovery (to say nothing of not letting it happen in the first place).

So no, he being hired under 1500tt didn't have ANYTHING to do with this accident and would not have prevented it.

Also, while the raw facts support your hypothesis, using AMW 5481 is a long stretch...
Window_Seat is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 01:38 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DWN3GRN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: F-4 Wild Weasel
Posts: 361
Default

FAA chief declines to back flight-time plan

Federal Aviation Administrator J. Randolph Babbitt on Thursday declined to back a proposal to increase the flight experience required of commercial airline pilots, drawing condemnation from a victims' family group that is fighting for new air safety regulations.

The provision is one of a number of air safety improvements sought by Democrats in Congress and the group Families of Continental Flight 3407, formed after a commuter plane crash that killed 50 people outside Buffalo in February.

A provision in a House bill approved in October prods the Federal Aviation Administration to require all airline pilots to obtain licenses that require 1,500 hours of flight time. Entry-level pilots now typically need about 250 hours.

In a Senate hearing Thursday, Babbitt said he believed the number of flight-time hours alone may not improve the flying proficiency of pilots.
DWN3GRN is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 01:57 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,318
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
This isn't necessarily geared towards you, but:

I'm rather amused that Generation Y has been dubbed "Generation Me" by the same baby boomers who have constantly rewritten the rules to suit their own situations and whose greed was the cause of the B-scale, small jet outsourcing, and pretty much every messed-up situation both in and outside the aviation industry.

Kinda like the pot calling the kettle black...
I hear ya on that. I'm pretty close to that generation when it comes to the age group. I differ because my parents taught me values and made me earn things. I actually first learned about generation "me" from Dr. Phil. Yeah, you catch a lot of Dr. Phil and Ellen when you are on reserve. There really is a legit generation of people that practically take pride in the fact that they perceive the universe as revolving around them.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 02:09 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Posts: 510
Default

quantity (flt hrs) has a quality of its own.
besides, most pilots are too cheap to get a room regardless of their compensation level.
mwa1 is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 02:17 PM
  #36  
2 days off
 
minimwage4's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: Embraer Systems Analyst
Posts: 1,853
Default

Originally Posted by Window_Seat
He crashed because he wasn't competent the fundamentals. Wasn't comfortable with stalls. That is to be learned in the very beginning, and mastered while a CFI. The guy didn't know how to recover from stalls. Important skill as a pilot. Colgan overlooked a lot of the guys history because they needed people to work at the level they were willing to pay. He was willing and eventually, in their opinion, a future captain. Colgan couldn't be selective. .
That's a little monday quarterbacking. How many times have you done stall recoveries with your airliner at 1500ft during inclement weather? Do you honestly believe that they didn't know how to get out of a stall, the FO? Another words if you had pulled that CA aside and asked him to explain stalls and recovery procedures, he would have gotten it wrong? A PPL should be able to get out of a stall. It's very obvious that airline training played a very key role in this, or lack of it, along with other factors like fatigue and maybe even crew pairings.
minimwage4 is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 03:24 PM
  #37  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by seafeye
Now if the starting pay was a reasonable $40k/year then Colgan would be able to attract the experienced pilots. And $40k is still low. We have just been conditioned to believe that we aren't worth anything more.

If the starting pay at Colgan was $40k, it would be higher than starting pay at the three mainlines Colgan serves.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 03:43 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: CFI
Posts: 416
Default

Originally Posted by minimwage4
That's a little monday quarterbacking. How many times have you done stall recoveries with your airliner at 1500ft during inclement weather? Do you honestly believe that they didn't know how to get out of a stall, the FO? Another words if you had pulled that CA aside and asked him to explain stalls and recovery procedures, he would have gotten it wrong? A PPL should be able to get out of a stall. It's very obvious that airline training played a very key role in this, or lack of it, along with other factors like fatigue and maybe even crew pairings.
Isn't the real shame the lack of a good instrument scan. If I remember correctly, neither noticed the aircraft slowing to or below 100 kts until the stick shaker. Part of being a competent pilot is having a good instrument scan. With a good scan and better situational awareness, the stick shaker would not have occured. Extra training in stall revovery is not going to make air travel safer. Why is training in a manuever so fundamental to initial solo flight even being contemplated?
Whacker77 is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 04:13 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
The Duke's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 396
Default

Again, I have yet to see a clear explanation HOW 1500 hrs. and an ATP will enhance safety.

Where is the data and statistics regarding which hour bracket has the highest rate of accidents/incidents up to this point in 121 aviation?

I think the younger generation deserves a break here. First Age 65 legislation and now this. There are plenty amongst them w/ less than 1500 hours and without an ATP who will make excellent first officers for our nation's airlines.

In the end the 1500 hour/ATP requirement will not benefit any of us in the 121 world today or tomorrow. It is a knee-jerk reaction that will penalize young, capable pilots looking for their break to pursue their dream.
The Duke is offline  
Old 12-11-2009, 04:41 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetPipeOverht's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: Stagnant..
Posts: 438
Default

The only reaction, sadly, that we're going to get is everyone who had to work their butts off in various facets just to get to a regional and are now stuck there blaming/putting down/'telling us how it is'/chastising/etc those who got hired on at/near/during a time of low mins. It's just a product of the ages, and not everyone who is hired at or near mins is a horrbile pilot or anything of the sort...it's just the result of the industry we find ourselves in.
JetPipeOverht is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pocho
Regional
550
12-20-2010 05:22 PM
KnightFlyer
Hangar Talk
14
03-29-2009 10:52 AM
konadog
Major
4
03-27-2009 06:39 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices