Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Even more qualified pilots on the street... >

Even more qualified pilots on the street...

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Even more qualified pilots on the street...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2009, 01:29 PM
  #71  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHandHold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: On The Jumpseat
Posts: 248
Exclamation

Originally Posted by exwaterski
LMAO. I can't believe you really said that.


Lollllllll, some people have no faith in Americans and the force we possess.

Even our fellow citizens seek to destroy us sometimes, but i know that we are a great people and that we WILL pull ourselves outta this rut that we are in.
NoHandHold is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 01:35 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHandHold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: On The Jumpseat
Posts: 248
Exclamation

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
Every year something like 8500 to 10,000 new commercial pilots are minted in the US. The military is also collectively producing something like 1500 new pilots per year. There is already a massive backlog of pilots who have been waiting to get recalled since 9-11. The human mass of experienced pilots is backing up big time.

It might be true that eventually retirements could reach 2000 per year but even at its height it is still woefully short of how many pilots that are building up daily awaiting a good job.

When hiring does resume someone is going to get hired but it does not really mean that anyone can count on it being them. It will be a drag out fist fight where seasoned regional captains have to stand in line behind space shuttle captains, the chief pilots son and blue angles.

2000 new hires per year after nearly two decades of waiting is not much at all. The bottom line is that it is still a long shot.

Skyhigh
Eventually reach 2000 pilots a year???

Did you read that those numbers ONLY INCLUDE 4 MAJOR CARRIERS???

Your argument is based off of incomplete information, retirements will reach 4000 a year at the very least. Just because this industry was ugly to you and now you are happy outside of it, does not mean that things will never turn around.

You guys are unbelievable, many of you believe this industry will be in the toilet for another 10 years. That is such an irrational argument it almost sounds like comedy. THIS STUFF IS CYCLICAL, EVEN A CHILD UNDERSTANDS THE CONCEPT OF NIGHT AND DAY.
NoHandHold is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 02:53 PM
  #73  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default Things change

Originally Posted by NoHandHold
Eventually reach 2000 pilots a year???

Did you read that those numbers ONLY INCLUDE 4 MAJOR CARRIERS???

Your argument is based off of incomplete information, retirements will reach 4000 a year at the very least. Just because this industry was ugly to you and now you are happy outside of it, does not mean that things will never turn around.

You guys are unbelievable, many of you believe this industry will be in the toilet for another 10 years. That is such an irrational argument it almost sounds like comedy. THIS STUFF IS CYCLICAL, EVEN A CHILD UNDERSTANDS THE CONCEPT OF NIGHT AND DAY.

First of all things change. You are counting your chickens before they are hatched. The classic legacy airline is under threat. Air travel has seen its heyday. Whos to say that most of those companies will even be around 10 to 20 years from now?

The industry could turn itself over several times before then and regionals could be flying 757's at CRJ wages. The bottom line is how those numbers directly effect you.

It is possible that a few thousand pilots per year could get hired but will it be any of us that gets those jobs? Who is to say that future growth will be in the legacies? Over the last decade LLC's and regionals are taking over. The legacies have been in full retreat. Free skies will begin to effect the future by then. Whose to say that a contracted pilot from India will not get the job? Will the jobs even be worth having by then?

I have seen most of my generation passed over in favor of younger people who are more flexible and can work for less. Who is to say that you will not be the next generation to get passed over? A lot needs to be considered before trying to project into the future. Optimism is one thing but this is aviation. Hope for the best but plan for the worst.

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 03:26 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHandHold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: On The Jumpseat
Posts: 248
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by SkyHigh
First of all things change. You are counting your chickens before they are hatched. The classic legacy airline is under threat. Air travel has seen its heyday. Whos to say that most of those companies will even be around 10 to 20 years from now?

The industry could turn itself over several times before then and regionals could be flying 757's at CRJ wages. The bottom line is how those numbers directly effect you.

It is possible that a few thousand pilots per year could get hired but will it be any of us that gets those jobs? Who is to say that future growth will be in the legacies? Over the last decade LLC's and regionals are taking over. The legacies have been in full retreat. Free skies will begin to effect the future by then. Whose to say that a contracted pilot from India will not get the job? Will the jobs even be worth having by then?

I have seen most of my generation passed over in favor of younger people who are more flexible and can work for less. Who is to say that you will not be the next generation to get passed over? A lot needs to be considered before trying to project into the future. Optimism is one thing but this is aviation. Hope for the best but plan for the worst.

Skyhigh
I am not counting anything my friend. All i have counted is factual retirement numbers from 4 legacies, and the current furloughs, that is all. All this other crap about flying 757's for CRJ wages is fubar to me, all i am giving is factual numbers on furloughs and retirements for 4 major carriers.

There is no stopping age 65, all these other wild theories and changes may happen, but fact is (and I stress the word fact) an entire generation is getting ready to retire.
NoHandHold is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 03:45 PM
  #75  
Stethoscope
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 308
Default

NoHandHold,

Your optimism is impressive… the force is strong with this one
cargo hopeful is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 03:51 PM
  #76  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHandHold's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: On The Jumpseat
Posts: 248
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by cargo hopeful
NoHandHold,

Your optimism is impressive… the force is strong with this one
The force will be with us............always.
NoHandHold is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 04:38 PM
  #77  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: B-73N FO
Posts: 532
Default

If this is going to have any meaning than we need to consider not just the pilots on furlough, but all commercial pilots who are qualified to fly 121 (actually competitive, not 200 hours and a wet commercial). In addition to the furloughs we need to include all of the part 91 and 135 guys who've lost jobs and all of the guys from

ATA
Skyway
Aloha
and all of the other operators that have shut down in the past year.

All of a sudden the number of pilots on the street starts looking pretty big.

But then again...I'm just a doom and gloom, I-Pod listening, backpack wearing, spikey haired, RAH scumbag...so what do I know (actually the only true parts are that I work for RAH and own an IPOD...but I figured I'd save you the time of having to type out your rebuttal XJTR.)
Emb170man is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 04:56 PM
  #78  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by xjtr
Wow. This is sad. What a waste. I'm sure at least half of these "qualified jobs" would be saved if RAH pilots were allowed to fly these planes for $23 an hour. Netjets FO pay rates of $60+ an hour was clearly excessive. I mean, for 5 seater jets?? We fly 100 seaters for much less!! What a wasted opportunity..
A; Netjets pilots aren't paid by the hour. B; Who are you to say what is and is not excessive for a company you don't even work for? I'm sure if you were a NetJets FO, you wouldn't be saying this.

To entertain your pointlessness....what does the number of seats have to do with anything? Not every operation's revenue is dependent on the number of seats. What about freighters? What about a GVI captain? Do you think that a Beech 1900 captain should make more just because there are more seats? What about the thing called the market? You have much to learn about the industry.

Forget your sense of entitlement. The ONLY reason that you fly 100 seaters for "much less" is because you either accepted the job or your union voted to be paid "much less". It is nobody's fault but yours and/or your union. Stop trying to lower the bar by bringing others down and bring yourself up. That is the cold truth sonny.

Last edited by Zapata; 11-06-2009 at 05:12 PM.
Zapata is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:03 PM
  #79  
Self Employed.
 
SkyHigh's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Corporate Pilot
Posts: 7,119
Default N7

Originally Posted by Emb170man
If this is going to have any meaning than we need to consider not just the pilots on furlough, but all commercial pilots who are qualified to fly 121 (actually competitive, not 200 hours and a wet commercial). In addition to the furloughs we need to include all of the part 91 and 135 guys who've lost jobs and all of the guys from

ATA
Skyway
Aloha
and all of the other operators that have shut down in the past year.

All of a sudden the number of pilots on the street starts looking pretty big.

But then again...I'm just a doom and gloom, I-Pod listening, backpack wearing, spikey haired, RAH scumbag...so what do I know (actually the only true parts are that I work for RAH and own an IPOD...but I figured I'd save you the time of having to type out your rebuttal XJTR.)
Don't forget the guys from National Airlines of Las Vegas !!

Skyhigh
SkyHigh is offline  
Old 11-06-2009, 06:07 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: e190
Posts: 929
Default

if you think you will become "well educated" from watching the news then you are probably too dumb to think for yourself or develop a truly educated opinion. The news media is so politically corrupted and biased that you have to take everything said with a grain of salt.
newarkblows is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mmaviator
Regional
30
04-15-2013 01:49 PM
ERJ135
GoJet
121
06-05-2009 09:58 AM
Rabid Seagull
Major
39
05-27-2009 02:56 PM
DWN3GRN
Major
81
11-17-2008 01:04 PM
cactiboss
Major
87
10-03-2008 02:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices