Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKW guys/gals - a question >

SKW guys/gals - a question

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKW guys/gals - a question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-2009, 04:37 PM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Posts: 40
Default

Originally Posted by BHopper88
Remember we are a "FAMILY" here at skywest, mgmt would never do anything that would hurt any of us pilots, CSAs, ramp agents, mx, etc....

So what is going to happen in 2010....
- 401k match going away?
- reduction or end of performance/ financial awards?
- Maybe even get charged even more to non rev...

It is interesting that Skywest inc is going after the health care at ASA too even thou it is in their contract...
How is ALPA going to stop 401K match from going away when they haven't been able to stop pensions from being underfunded or not at all (TWA) or them being sold to the government? How is ALPA going to stop the payment for non-rev travel?
Go Ugly Early is offline  
Old 12-20-2009, 08:03 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Posts: 168
Default

I believe asa has those medical benefits in their contract. Can't just yank it out.
nigelcobalt is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 01:47 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by nigelcobalt
I believe asa has those medical benefits in their contract. Can't just yank it out.

Ya, no union contract has ever been gutted. Or violated, and told to "file a grievance". No retirements taken, no unilateral changes, no imposed work rules..................
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 12-21-2009, 02:18 AM
  #114  
The NeverEnding Story
Thread Starter
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Ya, no union contract has ever been gutted. Or violated, and told to "file a grievance". No retirements taken, no unilateral changes, no imposed work rules..................
Except that Skywest is not in bankruptcy, where (non-government) union contracts are gutted, retirements are taken, unilateral changes made, and work rules imposed.
BoilerUP is online now  
Old 12-21-2009, 09:02 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 420
Default For TonyWilliams . . .

THREADJACK - skip this post if you only want to read posts on topic

Tony -

I want to take a brief moment here, on this public forum, and apologize about a recent exchange we had about Skywest and how it does or does not wrongfully treat people.

For some curious reason, it seems recently I have been flying with FO's and talking with Captains in the crew lounges about all the shady B.S. that Skywest pulls from time to time on its pilots and flight attendants. Some events I have heard before, some I have not. Several I have personal knowledge of occurring in the last few weeks.

Over the course of my 5 years at Skywest, I have always tried to have a good attitude and do the best job I can - as I am sure you did the same. I still feel Skywest is a good place to work, however, I absolutely recognize and realize that it is very, very far from perfect. St. George still wants to run this place like the little mom and pop airline it used to be. Just do what mom or pop says, don't think, don't challenge, don't ask. If they like you great, if not watch out.

Even though I don't know you personally, I say this with confidence, good people like you get the "short end" of the stick without due cause or due process many times.

Anyway for what its worth, I felt that I needed to contact you again and publicly apologize. Hope you have a Happy Holiday Season. I will be stuck on lousy 4 day trips over Xmas and New Years. Oh well.
JDFlyer is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 01:58 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Except that Skywest is not in bankruptcy, where (non-government) union contracts are gutted, retirements are taken, unilateral changes made, and work rules imposed.

I don't believe bankruptcy is the only way to sidestep a union contract in the (non-government) arena. A quick search will find "alter-ego" airlines, initially filled with plenty of non-union pilots working under rules that would violate the contracts from their "ego" affiliates.

As to the government union side, check out the $5 million party the FAA managers are having in ATL. That's after 3 years of a unilaterally imposed contract. No strike, no bankruptcy. Without the current government political leadership, it would still be the same.

Those imposed work rules were only one year after (in 2005) sending home the federally employed flight service station folks, some with days to go before retirement, so they could sell the jobs to non-union "alter ego" employees at Lockheed Martin. Those guys may never get their jobs back.

I'm not saying don't fight the good fight. But don't fall prey to union organizer or supporter rhetoric that implies that you're 100% safe in the union. Remember this:

ANYTHING OF VALUE IN YOUR UNION CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO SOMEBODY WANTING TO TAKE IT, BY WHAT EVER METHOD, LEGAL, QUASI-LEGAL, OR ILLEGAL.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 12-23-2009, 02:12 AM
  #117  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by JDFlyer
THREADJACK - skip this post if you only want to read posts on topic

Tony -

I want to take a brief moment here, on this public forum, and apologize about a recent exchange we had about Skywest and how it does or does not wrongfully treat people.

Thank you. If my circumstances can aid SkyWest pilots in getting a union on par with what SAPA tries to do, and what SWAPA does for Southwest, then I'd be very, very happy.

I still think SkyWest is a good company to work for overall, by the way. They take advantage of pilot's who will work for almost nothing, but that's no different than all the rest.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 12-24-2009, 07:41 AM
  #118  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
I don't believe bankruptcy is the only way to sidestep a union contract in the (non-government) arena. A quick search will find "alter-ego" airlines, initially filled with plenty of non-union pilots working under rules that would violate the contracts from their "ego" affiliates.

As to the government union side, check out the $5 million party the FAA managers are having in ATL. That's after 3 years of a unilaterally imposed contract. No strike, no bankruptcy. Without the current government political leadership, it would still be the same.

Those imposed work rules were only one year after (in 2005) sending home the federally employed flight service station folks, some with days to go before retirement, so they could sell the jobs to non-union "alter ego" employees at Lockheed Martin. Those guys may never get their jobs back.

I'm not saying don't fight the good fight. But don't fall prey to union organizer or supporter rhetoric that implies that you're 100% safe in the union. Remember this:

ANYTHING OF VALUE IN YOUR UNION CONTRACT IS SUBJECT TO SOMEBODY WANTING TO TAKE IT, BY WHAT EVER METHOD, LEGAL, QUASI-LEGAL, OR ILLEGAL.
As soon as a union is voted in, you go into status quo. So the company is not allowed to change any of its current policies or practices (written or unwritten). They are required to negotiate a contract with the covered employees. ALPA has learned (the hard way) about solid scope, M&A, and fragmentation clauses so this would be priority number one in any new ALPA contract thus eliminating the threat of alter egos.

I tried to explain this status quo concept to dozens of Skywest pilots back during the drive because it seemed to be a major concern for them that once votes are counted and the company realizes their pilots are unionized that their management would start unilaterally making life worse for them. Beside the fact that this would be illegal and that ALPA would file a lawsuit to impose an injunction on Skywest if they attempted that (just like they got an injunction on Skywest to stop its tactics during the organizing drive), if you feel your management would try to do things like this then doesn't speak to the fact that maybe you do need a union with the power of laws behind it to defend you against such actions? I personally, from speaking with a dozen friends who worked there, didn't think that they would do that. I tried to explain to them that just because you are unionized doesn't mean that you have to have an adversarial relationship with your management. I pointed to my pilot group as the best example of that. Hell, my MEC looked after the best interest of Skywest pilots as well when JA tried to buy XJT.
Nevets is offline  
Old 12-24-2009, 08:24 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by Nevets
As soon as a union is voted in, you go into status quo. So the company is not allowed to change any of its current policies or practices (written or unwritten).


What you're saying is all true, but has very little to do with my comments.

If management were to acquiesce to the fact that OO pilots will unionize, now is the time for them to put the screws to the pilots before the "freeze" period of a union drive. Therefore, the status quo would be as low as they wanted to negotiate from (take, now, whatever retirement, medical, vacation, profit sharing, etc).

Since I lived through the last union drive as a SAPA rep, I'm intimately familiar with the freeze concept. We couldn't get anything done.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 12-24-2009, 10:04 AM
  #120  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: EMB 145 CPT
Posts: 2,934
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
What you're saying is all true, but has very little to do with my comments.

If management were to acquiesce to the fact that OO pilots will unionize, now is the time for them to put the screws to the pilots before the "freeze" period of a union drive. Therefore, the status quo would be as low as they wanted to negotiate from (take, now, whatever retirement, medical, vacation, profit sharing, etc).

Since I lived through the last union drive as a SAPA rep, I'm intimately familiar with the freeze concept. We couldn't get anything done.
I agree and that is why I also made the point that if management actually did put the screws to the pilots then it says a lot of that management and make the case stronger for unionizing. I'm not sure they would do that mostly because I think they feel it would backfire on them. Or maybe I'm dead wrong since they are making changes that will lower their health insurance costs.
Nevets is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
maveric311
Allegiant
10
03-26-2009 10:46 AM
RVSM Certified
Flight Schools and Training
22
02-27-2009 12:04 PM
strikeplate
Money Talk
7
02-12-2009 09:33 AM
USMCFLYR
Military
16
08-28-2008 09:15 PM
USMCFLYR
Hangar Talk
3
08-23-2008 08:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices