Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
SKYW provides funding to UA, ASA to fly UAX >

SKYW provides funding to UA, ASA to fly UAX

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

SKYW provides funding to UA, ASA to fly UAX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2009, 04:08 PM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
Who didn't see that one coming !!!! For the very survival of SkyWest (in it's current form) they have to keep UAL going, whether a cash handout, "investment", buy out, etc.
Yep and time will tell just how far SKW will go.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:10 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
iPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Posts: 638
Default

SkyWest knows if UA fails they go with them. They're sitting on all that cash at the moment so the best thing to do is to keep UA propped up until things improve. In the meantime the investment will give SKW and edge on securing contracts (a la AWAC) and get them a say on any bankruptcy hearings.

Worst case scenario UA goes tango-uniform in which case it really doesn't matter how much SKW has stashed away in the bank.
iPilot is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:19 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TonyWilliams's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Self employed
Posts: 3,048
Default

Originally Posted by JetJock16
It's United..........they don't care about what makes good business sense [fifty seat regional jets]. They only care about screwing their own labor groups.
I remember at a meeting with Jerry/Chip that UAL actually liked the 50 seaters in some markets, 'cuz they made sense. Sending in a 70, or 90, or 110, or whatever machine that has lower per seat cost doesn't make sense if the plane isn't mostly full.

It's still cheaper to have 40 pax in a 50 seat CRJ, than 40 pax in a E-175 or B737. Some of those pax want to get on a big bird to somewhere on a ticket that cost beau coup bucks. If UAL doesn't provide it, somebody no doubt will.
TonyWilliams is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:26 PM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JetJock16's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: SkyWest Capt.
Posts: 2,963
Default

Originally Posted by TonyWilliams
I remember at a meeting with Jerry/Chip that UAL actually liked the 50 seaters in some markets, 'cuz they made sense. Sending in a 70, or 90, or 110, or whatever machine that has lower per seat cost doesn't make sense if the plane isn't mostly full.

It's still cheaper to have 40 pax in a 50 seat CRJ, than 40 pax in a E-175 or B737. Some of those pax want to get on a big bird to somewhere on a ticket that cost beau coup bucks. If UAL doesn't provide it, somebody no doubt will.
I wasn't just talking about 50 seat flying and in many markets they make sense.
JetJock16 is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 04:54 PM
  #85  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
I can't remember, but wasn't that flying restricted to the SPECIFIC tail numbers of the AVRO? Thought I saw that on a commute one time.
Sort of...but not really.

Originally Posted by UAL ALPA Scope Section
1-C-1-d Number of Block Hours of Feeder Flying
In each calendar year, the number of scheduled block
hours of Feeder Flying may not exceed the number of
scheduled block hours of Company Flying.

1-C-1-f Feeder Carrier Operation of Small Jets Larger than 50 Seats (jets for jobs)
A Feeder Carrier may perform Feeder Flying operating
Small Jets with a certificated seating capacity in excess of
fifty (50) seats if it also provides job opportunities to
furloughed United Pilots in accordance with Letter of
Agreement 03-22.

1-K-10 "Feeder Carrier" means a Domestic Air Carrier that,
when engaged in code sharing with the Company:
1-K-10-a Does not operate any aircraft that utilizes an
engine with an external propeller ("Turbo/Prop Aircraft")
other than Turbo/Prop Aircraft that are certificated for
seventy-eight (78) or fewer seats and have a maximum
permitted gross takeoff weight of less than seventy-five
thousand (75,000) pounds; and
1-K-10-b Does not operate any aircraft that utilizes a
turbine-driven engine without an external propeller ("Jet
Aircraft"), other than Small Jets.

1-K-22 "Small Jets" means (a) Jet Aircraft that are
certificated in the United States of America for seventy (70)
or fewer seats and a maximum permitted gross takeoff weight
of less than eighty thousand (80,000) pounds and (b) up to
eighteen (18) specific aircraft with certificated seating
capacity in excess of seventy (70) seats operated by Feeder
Carrier Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. ("AWAC"). These
eighteen aircraft are identified as the "AWAC Quota".
Currently, the AWAC Quota is filled by BAe-146 aircraft with
the following tail numbers: N463AP, N179US, N181US,
N183US, N606AW, N607AW, N608AW, N609AW, N610AW,
N611AW, N612AW, N614AW, N615AW, N616AW, N290UE,
N291UE, N292UE, and N156TR. AWAC may replace any
aircraft within the AWAC Quota with
: (i) any other BAe-146 or
AVRO 85 aircraft each with no more passenger seats than
were carried in the actual operation of the replaced aircraft,
or (ii) any other aircraft with a maximum certificated seating
capacity in the United States of eighty-five (85) seats and a
maximum certificated gross takeoff weight in the United
States of up to ninety thousand (90,000) pounds.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 05:49 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Reading that gave me a headache.

I can guarantee that the lawyers that wrote got paid A LOT more than the pilots it affects. And that would be before their first concession.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 10-21-2009, 06:10 PM
  #87  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

I'm pretty sure (but not 100% sure) that language is from UAL ALPA's post-BK contract.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:18 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
I'm pretty sure (but not 100% sure) that language is from UAL ALPA's post-BK contract.
I'm pretty sure I remember reading it on a commute when they were taking one of the concessions during BK. But like I said, can't remember if that was the first or second concession.

I don't think they've a contract since exiting BK, have they? I though it was just LOA's, like when they were able to get pay protection for the narrow body fleets, etc.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 05:49 AM
  #89  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

I've been informed by a senior UAL pilot the aforementioned "AWAC quota" language is still in place and in force in UAL ALPA's current CBA.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 10-22-2009, 09:45 AM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lambourne's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 844
Default

The "loan" from SKYW will never have to be repaid by UAL. Seeing as how the amount is not that great. I am guessing this was UAL's estimate of the amount of monetary penalties that ASA would pile up for lack of performance in the new UAX operation.

L
Lambourne is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
BHopper88
Regional
42
07-29-2009 09:28 AM
Mason32
Hangar Talk
8
02-07-2009 07:30 AM
JoeyMeatballs
Regional
51
12-12-2008 11:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices