Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Maybe, Just Maybe? Progress?? >

Maybe, Just Maybe? Progress??

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Maybe, Just Maybe? Progress??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-2009, 07:17 PM
  #81  
C21H30O2
 
GrUpGrDn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: L/R or workin' the panels!
Posts: 356
Default

Originally Posted by NoStep
LOL!!! Don't always agree with you, LabRat, but you hit the nail on the head! Let's see, here's how I relate to it...in my family there's 1 B747-400 Capt., 1 B737-800 Capt., and 1 CRJ200 F/O. Almost 40,000 hours and at least 12 type-ratings without a single 4-year degree. Statistically speaking, we'd all be so much more qualified if we'd just, "...sat on the front lawn of some liberal arts college, smokin' dope and bad-mouthin' my country!" (What movie?) (not flame-bating...just food for thought)
Back to school ala Rodney Dangerfield
A great line spoken by Sam Kinnison
GrUpGrDn is offline  
Old 10-19-2009, 08:08 PM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
BSOuthisplace's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: N/A
Posts: 637
Default

Can we all just agree that you can't entirely predict the quality of a pilot based on hours, educational background, type of flying experience, etc.

I think it's a case by case basis that should be left up to the airline, and their training department.

It's too bad that congress, the FAA, and most disappointing, fellow pilots, lost sight of what the real culprit was. Poor training.
BSOuthisplace is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 12:52 AM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
afterburn81's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: A320
Posts: 1,316
Default

Originally Posted by BSOuthisplace
Can we all just agree that you can't entirely predict the quality of a pilot based on hours, educational background, type of flying experience, etc.

I think it's a case by case basis that should be left up to the airline, and their training department.

It's too bad that congress, the FAA, and most disappointing, fellow pilots, lost sight of what the real culprit was. Poor training.

Poor training? You mean, NO training. If it was "poor training" then the FAA is to blame for letting them through rendering your case of letting the airling training dept catch it to blame. Sure I'll agree with you that you can't predict the quality of a pilot based on all the training and experience they have. However, I bet I would be right at least 95% of the time when I guessed the outcome of an airline in which all the pilots just paid for a seat in a jet and took the easy way out. It doesn't take rocket science to figure that one out. Just statistics.

I'm not sure if all can remember but a common analogy used when teaching the FOI's back in the day of the initial CFI was that you cannot simply "pour" information into a student's head. Some things must be experienced and experiential learning is the most powerful tool out there. You guys can cry all you want but if you want to be responsible for people's lives while being in command of a aluminum tube full of gas traveling 5 miles high and slightly subsonic, it would be prudent to just do the right thing and learn what the consequences are BEFORE you make your way into that nice shinny jet.
afterburn81 is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 05:36 AM
  #84  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Be Realistic's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: A-320
Posts: 175
Default

Stsi202

Best post so far on this topic!!!!!!

Military - low time pilots on heavy metal
Europe - low time pilots on heavey metal

Both safe

Isn't it about time people stopped harping on about hours, confusing the old irritating phrase "Paying dues" with safety?

Change the regs so that some people who cannot fly don't get through. Surely not every body who has $50k has a right to the left seat, even if they got their scrapped through their CFI and have 1500 hrs?
Be Realistic is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 06:04 AM
  #85  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Position: Jet Pilot
Posts: 797
Default

Originally Posted by Be Realistic
Isn't it about time people stopped harping on about hours, confusing the old irritating phrase "Paying dues" with safety?

Change the regs so that some people who cannot fly don't get through. Surely not every body who has $50k has a right to the left seat, even if they got their scrapped through their CFI and have 1500 hrs?
I don't see anybody making direct correlation between paying dues and safety. There does seem to be a correlation between one's experience and safety. "The paying your dues" has more to do with whatever sacrifices one makes on his or her way up the ladder.

I think the regs are good enough, it is just a matter of enforcing the standards.
Lab Rat is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 01:06 PM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atpcliff's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Capt
Posts: 3,215
Default

Hi!

This bill mandates that the FAA study commuting.

It mandates that the FAA change the Flight/Duty/Rest requirements.

It WILL raise the pay at at least some of the regionals.
There were a number of regionals, in 2007/8, that were hiring pilot candidates with less than 200 hours TT, and/or no Commercial License at all.

Currently, the Part 141 schools, can get guys a Commercial with as low as about 166 hours. The House version of the bill said the FAA could decided what to credit the Pilot Us for classroom/sim time, etc.

I have read other posts saying the Senate requires an ATP (period).

For the bill to pass, the House and Senate will have to align their bills, so the lowered Pilot U. requirement could be quashed in committee.

cliff
NBO
atpcliff is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 01:17 PM
  #87  
On Reserve
 
bigDummy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Astra Captain
Posts: 19
Default

Remember. This bill has to be reconciled with the senate version (if passed). Right now it doesn't mean much. Perhaps the loophole will be closed in reconciliation......
bigDummy is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 02:13 PM
  #88  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by atpcliff
...There were a number of regionals, in 2007/8, that were hiring pilot candidates with less than 200 hours TT, and/or no Commercial License at all...
Ahhhh....maybe I am missing something, but isn't that commercial liscense thing kind of required for you to be compensated for your pilot services? (insert low pilot pay joke here)
skywatch is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 03:25 PM
  #89  
Line Holder
 
Hot Rod Wannabe's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Banker....UGH!
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Be Realistic
Stsi202

Best post so far on this topic!!!!!!

Military - low time pilots on heavy metal
Europe - low time pilots on heavey metal

Both safe

Isn't it about time people stopped harping on about hours, confusing the old irritating phrase "Paying dues" with safety?

Change the regs so that some people who cannot fly don't get through. Surely not every body who has $50k has a right to the left seat, even if they got their scrapped through their CFI and have 1500 hrs?
They being Alpa, US House of Reps, and others, have missed the mark again. Instead of focusing on safety in training they are throwing the baby out with the bath water. Hours don't make people safe, more structure on safety and education of pilots are more important than the hours. CRM and what is and isn't a sterile cockpit! Discipline of the pilots because it doesn't matter who would have been in the cockpit with the colgan pilots, because when the stick shaker went off it was a notice that they only had seconds to live and they should have started praying! Nobody could have saved them, not even Chuck Yeager! It is a sad thing that safety has taken a back seat to this tragedy.
Hot Rod Wannabe is offline  
Old 10-20-2009, 03:33 PM
  #90  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by Hot Rod Wannabe
They being Alpa, US House of Reps, and others, have missed the mark again. Instead of focusing on safety in training they are throwing the baby out with the bath water. Hours don't make people safe, more structure on safety and education of pilots are more important than the hours. CRM and what is and isn't a sterile cockpit! Discipline of the pilots because it doesn't matter who would have been in the cockpit with the colgan pilots, because when the stick shaker went off it was a notice that they only had seconds to live and they should have started praying! Nobody could have saved them, not even Chuck Yeager! It is a sad thing that safety has taken a back seat to this tragedy.
Wait a second...you mean simply raising the minimum hours to 1500 in the wake of a couple of 2200-5000 hour regional crews balling up perfectly good airplanes wont make us safer?
Clocks is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HIREME
Regional
36
05-15-2009 03:00 PM
vagabond
Union Talk
2
01-15-2009 11:15 PM
jungle
Money Talk
20
01-10-2009 10:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices