Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Xjt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-03-2009, 11:19 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
IADBLRJ41's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2008
Position: 756 FO
Posts: 319
Default

Originally Posted by newarkblows
SKywest would be operating 450 plus or minus airplanes if they won the contract. That is a lot of airplanes to spread your costs over and they offer a good product.

That is very true!
IADBLRJ41 is offline  
Old 10-03-2009, 12:08 PM
  #32  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Where are y'all around ORD? thought that flying was extended, but haven't seen any Aquafresh ERJ's around. IAD maybe?
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 10-03-2009, 12:59 PM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Posts: 3,732
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Where are y'all around ORD? thought that flying was extended, but haven't seen any Aquafresh ERJ's around. IAD maybe?
Nope, that flying ended right on schedule.

There was a provision in the deal that UAL had a rolling extension period, but it never got used. Obviously.
dojetdriver is offline  
Old 10-03-2009, 02:18 PM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: Airbus
Posts: 634
Default

ExpressJet taking a look at Gary

10/3

Gary/Chicago International Airport is in talks with regional carrier ExpressJet to fly from Gary to major airline hubs such as Denver International and Dulles International in Washington, D.C.

UAL flying?
nwa757 is offline  
Old 10-03-2009, 06:21 PM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 161
Default

Originally Posted by nwa757
ExpressJet taking a look at Gary

10/3

Gary/Chicago International Airport is in talks with regional carrier ExpressJet to fly from Gary to major airline hubs such as Denver International and Dulles International in Washington, D.C.

UAL flying?
It's probably just due diligence (maybe a part of the RFP relating to at-risk flying for united?). Before you enter a contract you crunch numbers, talk to the parties affected, and otherwise figure out its a good deal. It's not a secret who bid on the flying. I'm sure ASA and others have spoken to numerous airports as well.
Clocks is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 04:49 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Default

Originally Posted by Slaphappy
They probably did, part of that rfp was for q-400s and UAL offered 10 planes to skywest for 2 years and they turned it down.
UAL offered the same thing to Mesa a couple of years ago, COO said it was too short of a contract to consider when the shortest lease on a 400 was 7 years.
SpiraMirabilis is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 05:47 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

You'd be pretty dumb to take such a short contract on a popular new airframe...hell it would take half that time first just to train up crews! Not to mention other costs. Guess even JO knows this. Look at the debacle with RAH/CO.
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 10-04-2009, 06:02 PM
  #38  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
You'd be pretty dumb to take such a short contract on a popular new airframe...hell it would take half that time first just to train up crews! Not to mention other costs. Guess even JO knows this. Look at the debacle with RAH/CO.
True that...word!
The Juice is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyin'Finn
Regional
16
09-25-2009 04:15 PM
ToiletDuck
Regional
11
08-22-2009 08:18 PM
cs757200
Regional
17
08-06-2009 04:22 AM
Nevets
Regional
29
07-02-2009 11:49 AM
wannabepilot
Regional
23
09-11-2008 06:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices