Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

ASA PBS agreed to

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2009, 02:27 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: Piloto
Posts: 172
Default

All I'm saying is that if you want to travel somewhere under some sort of privelage just call up a chief pilot. Remember when you interviewed at ASA? You got the voucher to fly to the interview and back. The same can be done while on furlough. I don't care if you come back or not, it's completely your decision. I'm just giving you an option if you want to interview elsewhere...
Banshee365 is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 02:40 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

Originally Posted by Jetrecruiter
Does it bring back the Furloughed guys... if it has growth in it then the 156 guys on the street should be happy with this news or is it going to JA @150% ? If your source is correct then that should be great news for the guys and gals on the street.
From everything I'm rearing, YES, it will. It will greatly increase our chances of winning an RFP (one ASA has already bid on, and are now revising their bid) that will provide a home for the 20 50s.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 02:43 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

Originally Posted by Banshee365
All I'm saying is that if you want to travel somewhere under some sort of privelage just call up a chief pilot. Remember when you interviewed at ASA? You got the voucher to fly to the interview and back. The same can be done while on furlough. I don't care if you come back or not, it's completely your decision. I'm just giving you an option if you want to interview elsewhere...
Uh, I'm pretty sure this information is incorrect. The sad reality is that DELTA, not ASA, not SkyWest controls out pass "privileges" 100%. ASA has absolutely no say in the matter.

They tried to negotiate furloughee pass "privileges" and DELTA's response was give up "S3 on your own metal". Obviously that was a deal killer. That would be the majority sacrificing for the few.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 05:11 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 479
Default

gtech - Calm down man, I know it feels, I was part of the 80. It sucks but the truth is that their is NOTHING you and I can do about it. Tell you the truth many of us didn't use out pass benefits much/at all after we got furloughed. What's the point in going places when you cannot afford it with no job. There was a e-mail sent out when I got furloughed and when you got furloughed saying that if you need to fly for an interview call them and they can see about hooking you up with a seat. Our fate is entirely on ALPA our pilot group and how they work with management. I am sure it is anger and frustration that causing you to blow your lid here and I do agree that there are a few at ASA that has been with them since they had a 121 job. Therefor they do not know what life under furlough is like. But remember there are MANY here at ASA that came from other airlines that was much worst with the furlough gun. They understand very well the situation we are in. Also what's the point of staying with an airline if it is bleeding money and cannot grow? PBS is something that we have to do sooner or later, otherwise everyone is going out underbid us. We just need to hope that our MECs are taking carefull steps so that PBS doesn't skrew us. Some say that's impossible others say it is. PBS can HELP ensure ASA future by lowering our costs. I dunno about you but one reason I came to ASA was because they paid well. This means higher costs for ASA at the same token, even more reason why PBS can save us. SKYW, RJET both pay well also and they use PBS. Our QOL maybe on line but crappy pay and lots of time off aint much of a QOL also. Let's just wait and see the details on PBS and as far as pass travel just contact the chief pilot or go on the ASA ALPA board. There are a few pilots on there that are donating their buddy passes also. You are senior to me buddy, hope to see you in the class ahead of me when we are recalled.
USMC3197 is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 06:20 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trip7's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,659
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp
To you PBS doubters, let's wait and see the actual agreement before we decide.

Don't know who mentioned the RFPs, but I have strong intelligence from multiple sources inside and outside of ASA, that lowering our costs by agreeing to PBS, in conjunction with the stability of locking in another year of the contract bodes very, very well for us in the October United RFP. Coincidentally, that flying begins in April, when our 20 50s become available. IAD anyone?
Would IAD go senior or junior?
Trip7 is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:07 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
todd1200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,025
Default

I don't understand how ASA could pick up United flying. Why wouldn't Skywest just take it themselves and avoid incurring the initial expenses, training, etc. of getting the operation spooled up at ASA. Couldn't they just take the 200s that we're parking?
todd1200 is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:20 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
atlmsl's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: ATL
Posts: 413
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
I don't understand how ASA could pick up United flying. Why wouldn't Skywest just take it themselves and avoid incurring the initial expenses, training, etc. of getting the operation spooled up at ASA. Couldn't they just take the 200s that we're parking?
Not sure what training would be required. The pilots are already qualified on the aircraft. All that changes is the base of operations. IAD would be new for Skywest and ASA alike.
atlmsl is offline  
Old 09-13-2009, 07:32 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: crj-200 FO
Posts: 479
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
I don't understand how ASA could pick up United flying. Why wouldn't Skywest just take it themselves and avoid incurring the initial expenses, training, etc. of getting the operation spooled up at ASA. Couldn't they just take the 200s that we're parking?
I do remember in training they mentioned something about a scope (something in the line of not flying for 2 different carriers out of the same coast/airport? or a certain amount of flying can be done? i dunno) and that is why it's good for ASA and SKYW to stay separate.

But if we are just talking about expenses then one can argue why don't SKYW just hand us all the DL flying and they take the UAL?

They already have like 129 200s and not all are being used, they don't want ours. My guess is Inc. wants us both to diversify, DL has too much leverage on us.
USMC3197 is offline  
Old 09-14-2009, 04:30 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: A320
Posts: 244
Default

Originally Posted by John Pennekamp
To you PBS doubters, let's wait and see the actual agreement before we decide.

Don't know who mentioned the RFPs, but I have strong intelligence from multiple sources inside and outside of ASA, that lowering our costs by agreeing to PBS, in conjunction with the stability of locking in another year of the contract bodes very, very well for us in the October United RFP. Coincidentally, that flying begins in April, when our 20 50s become available. IAD anyone?

The company can not understandably say much about these things, but where can the reasonable assurance come from that if the pilots back it and vote PBS in that they won't be played a fool if the RFP is lost to another carrier.

Also, what's the time frame of voting it in?
Gunga Galunga is offline  
Old 09-14-2009, 05:32 AM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
John Pennekamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: Captain, CRJ-200, ASA
Posts: 876
Default

Originally Posted by todd1200
I don't understand how ASA could pick up United flying. Why wouldn't Skywest just take it themselves and avoid incurring the initial expenses, training, etc. of getting the operation spooled up at ASA. Couldn't they just take the 200s that we're parking?
Why won't the flying go to SkyWest? Simple answer. When a company shrinks, its unit costs go up. When a company grows, its costs go down. SKW Inc. needs to grow ASA to lower our costs. There would be no training costs.

As for SkyWest taking the 50s, they don't need them. They are already fat... that's why they're in ATL and CVG.
John Pennekamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SilkySmooth
Regional
41
03-11-2009 10:03 AM
FlyASA
Regional
8
03-08-2009 09:31 AM
Banshee365
Regional
126
11-09-2008 07:15 PM
Airfix
Regional
26
11-06-2008 11:38 AM
John Pennekamp
Regional
38
10-30-2008 07:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices