Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Another 13 Saabs to leave Mesaba in 2009 >

Another 13 Saabs to leave Mesaba in 2009

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Another 13 Saabs to leave Mesaba in 2009

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2009, 08:18 AM
  #51  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Right Seat Skipper/BKK Tour Guide
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by CloudPilot57
How much is this birdy "in the knkow?"

I hope not??
Let just say they knew about the Saabs months ago....
The Farang is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:20 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrustsetrj200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by The Farang
Things are not looking good for Mesaba. I little birdy told me that Mesaba will end up just like Compass flying 36 CRJ900's. 50 Capacity will be GREATLY reduced starting first quarter 2010. Except more Comair and Mesaba 200's to get cut.
ha ha give me a break. Stop the flame. That won't happen. The 50 capacity reductions is believable. But you have to remember that SkyWest, Pinnacle and Comair (just to name a few) are MAJOR 200 operators and when their contracts are up (I know Comair is wholly owned and doesn't have a contract) that's where the 200 reduction will occur. Mesaba isn't getting rid of their 200s just yet.

PS. The Farang is still a little bitter over the Mesaba/Xjet issue in RST. He doesn't care too much for Mesaba. He's just flaming on this board.
thrustsetrj200 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:24 AM
  #53  
:-)
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Default

Originally Posted by BoilerUP
Delta should really be looking at the "next-gen" ATR 42/72-600s for their route structure. Substantially lower acquisition & operating costs than an RJ on a sub-300nm segment with substantially better performance & revenue potential than an older Saab.
That would make too much sense. The turboprop has a bright future, and the new ATR I hear, is more comfortable than the CRJ.
Mesabah is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:24 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
thrustsetrj200's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Posts: 195
Default

Originally Posted by The Farang
Let just say they knew about the Saabs months ago....
This little birdy is all just a figment of your imagination. We don't want to hear about the voices in your head.

Once Delta announced that the first 10 Saabs were going back it was a no-brainer that they would continue.
thrustsetrj200 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:47 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Lighteningspeed's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: G550 Captain
Posts: 1,206
Default

Originally Posted by thrustsetrj200
ha ha give me a break. Stop the flame. That won't happen. The 50 capacity reductions is believable. But you have to remember that SkyWest, Pinnacle and Comair (just to name a few) are MAJOR 200 operators and when their contracts are up (I know Comair is wholly owned and doesn't have a contract) that's where the 200 reduction will occur. Mesaba isn't getting rid of their 200s just yet.

PS. The Farang is still a little bitter over the Mesaba/Xjet issue in RST. He doesn't care too much for Mesaba. He's just flaming on this board.

++1. Well put. XJ only has 16 CRJ200s and they are not going anywhere for a while. If I was a gambling man, I'd put my money on most of the Saabs going away but XJ getting more CRJ7s and CRJ9s from another DCI carrier. The total number of pilots at XJ may decrease from 1170 but not by much by the time 2010 rolls around. DAL has something planned for XJ in 2010 and from all indications, it is positive.

DAL is putting pressure on SkyWest at SLC. Next time you fly to SLC just count the number of XJ CRJ9s there. Heck they even put a note in the DAL crewroom that Mesaba flight crews are entitled to use their bag room and their crewroom.
Lighteningspeed is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:58 AM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Right Seat Skipper/BKK Tour Guide
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by thrustsetrj200
ha ha give me a break. Stop the flame. That won't happen. The 50 capacity reductions is believable. But you have to remember that SkyWest, Pinnacle and Comair (just to name a few) are MAJOR 200 operators and when their contracts are up (I know Comair is wholly owned and doesn't have a contract) that's where the 200 reduction will occur. Mesaba isn't getting rid of their 200s just yet.
When are their contracts up?
Skywest/ASA is 2020.
Pinnacle's is 2017.
That will be a while until either of those get reductions in 50 seaters, unless they are exchanges for 900's (which they can't current due to scope) or they fail to meet performance goals. Look at how much hassle MESA has been for Delta to get rid of. Reduction will come from the wholly owns.

You heard it hear first folks. Sorry for the bad news.

Little hint fellas..There is a reason no 200's have gone to paint...
The Farang is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 09:05 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
sigep_nm's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 614
Default

Originally Posted by The Farang
When are their contracts up?
Skywest/ASA is 2020.
Pinnacle's is 2017.
That will be a while until either of those get reductions in 50 seaters, unless they are exchanges for 900's (which they can't current due to scope) or they fail to meet performance goals. Look at how much hassle MESA has been for Delta to get rid of. Reduction will come from the wholly owns.

You heard it hear first folks. Sorry for the bad news.

Little hint fellas..There is a reason no 200's have gone to paint...
Then can you explain why the saab's did go to paint?
sigep_nm is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 09:09 AM
  #58  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Position: Right Seat Skipper/BKK Tour Guide
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by sigep_nm
Then can you explain why the saab's did go to paint?
Because during the 'C' checks they found corrosion on the airframes. In order to resolve that issue you need to strip the paint, sand blast, repair, seal, and repaint.
The Farang is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 09:09 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by sigep_nm
Then can you explain why the saab's did go to paint?
something has to hold them together...a coat of paint is as good as anything
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 09:27 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ZDub's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: Dry hopping a 90 Min IPA
Posts: 215
Default

Originally Posted by The Farang
Because during the 'C' checks they found corrosion on the airframes. In order to resolve that issue you need to strip the paint, sand blast, repair, seal, and repaint.
And where did you get that information from?
ZDub is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201720
04-06-2022 07:59 AM
CAL EWR
Major
11
08-02-2009 04:03 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 04:20 PM
Past V1
Regional
22
03-18-2009 06:57 PM
Bigflya
Major
1
11-12-2008 06:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices