Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Letter from a gojets pilot >

Letter from a gojets pilot

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Letter from a gojets pilot

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-09-2009, 11:29 AM
  #121  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by pause
So, why didn't the TSA pilots & ALPA appeal the NMB decision?? Talk about "rolling over" The TSA pilots & ALPA are a prime example. On a side note...if the pilots were so upset over the outcome why didn't they all just quit TSA & go some place else...you know..like "McDonalds" or the "Wal-Mart" to really make a stand and "raise the bar"you guys are always spouting about??
They didn't appeal the decision because once the appeal is done, its done. It is a strategic move to keep the options open for the future for an appeal at the right time, which could be written in as part of a new contract in order to force the merging of seniority lists. I know, I know, the possibility of merging lists is slim to none, but because the appeal is still pending, the lists could then be merged without the GJ pilot input (not that they'd have any input because they don't have a union representing the pilots anyway). Again, the likelihood of this happening is nil, but the option is available to be put on the table...as the negotiating committee did in it's response to the "Bridge Agreement". God forbid a pilot group should think long term.

AirWillie...I didn't say anything about pimp my ride, but you really have not responded to any of the points I've made without dismissing me as an incredible source. Also, the pimp my ride response was a half-joke in response to the Overhaulin' analogy. Way to respond to a real issue.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:36 AM
  #122  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by mustache ride
The more time we spend beating each other up, the more TSA(H) sits back, earns money, and laughs at just how successfully they've pinned the pilots against each other. If we are really interested in success in having a mutually beneficial experience at TSA(H), we're going to have to work together. Without that, the division will be the end of this company, which may be for the best.
Don't forget, attempts have been made to reach out to 618, but that only resulted in GJ'ers who wanted to cooperate getting fired. Joining forces with 618 is impossible because 618 IS management. They have no desire to cooperate because that means giving up their their cozy relationship with management and probably being fired.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:40 AM
  #123  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by TBucket
And yet, after seeing the start of gojets chronicled like that (Which you have seen before on here), you can still claim that it's OK to work there. Ostensibly because "It's not an alter ego, it was created because TSA couldn't fly 70 seaters!!!" It's been said/proven MANY times that that was not the reason gojets exists the way it does now. So, how can you keep justifying it???
Where does it say on there that it's TSA flying? Where? It's gojet flying. If it was TSA flying, we would not have a separate list, it would have been an open and shut case for TSA. Make an air tight contract next time. It's almost as ridiculous as major pilots crying over RJs taking over their jobs which they allowed. The point that I am trying to make is that it's not anyones fault but managements and the people responsible for the debacle. No use in beating a dead horse, try to focus on what really matters in your negotiations so mistakes will not be made again.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:49 AM
  #124  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Its not TSA's flying. There, I've said it.

ITS TSH's FLYING! And it should be flown by TSH's pilots, not TSA and GJ pilots.

And its kinda funny that you say its no one's fault but mgmt, but then place the blame on the "mistakes" of TSA ALPA.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:53 AM
  #125  
Gets Weekends Off
 
250 or point 65's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Posts: 999
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Make an air tight contract next time.
Wake up man. Thats what we're trying to do, but you keep saying we should "give a little to get a little" and "how come mesa and GJ can get a contract done so quickly and TSA cant"

Which one is it? Do you want us to raise the bar or roll over? Its kind of funny that you tell us to have an airtight contract but you're the ones who are going to suffer from your POS contract when they dissolve TSA and open a GJ alter ego.
250 or point 65 is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:54 AM
  #126  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65
ITS TSH's FLYING! And it should be flown by TSH's pilots, not TSA and GJ pilots.
Ok then what happened with the court case? It should be straight forward spelling out of a regional contract isn't it?
AirWillie is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 11:57 AM
  #127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by 250 or point 65
Wake up man. Thats what we're trying to do, but you keep saying we should "give a little to get a little" and "how come mesa and GJ can get a contract done so quickly and TSA cant"

Which one is it? Do you want us to raise the bar or roll over? Its kind of funny that you tell us to have an airtight contract but you're the ones who are going to suffer from your POS contract when they dissolve TSA and open a GJ alter ego.
that was in the context of the 05 negs where they were asking your for terms for the single list. now you guys have nothing to lose though huh
AirWillie is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 03:14 PM
  #128  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DryMotorBoatin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2008
Position: Seat 0B
Posts: 1,214
Default

Did the mods fall asleep or what? How has a gojets thread gotten to 13 pages?
DryMotorBoatin is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 05:55 PM
  #129  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TPROP4ever's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: none ya...
Posts: 1,154
Default

Originally Posted by DryMotorBoatin
Did the mods fall asleep or what? How has a gojets thread gotten to 13 pages?

Because suprisingly the conversation is going somewhat ok, its a start ...
TPROP4ever is offline  
Old 09-09-2009, 08:45 PM
  #130  
Gets Weekends Off
 
dontsurf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: A220 CA
Posts: 607
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Where does it say on there that it's TSA flying? Where? It's gojet flying. If it was TSA flying, we would not have a separate list, it would have been an open and shut case for TSA. Make an air tight contract next time. It's almost as ridiculous as major pilots crying over RJs taking over their jobs which they allowed. The point that I am trying to make is that it's not anyones fault but managements and the people responsible for the debacle. No use in beating a dead horse, try to focus on what really matters in your negotiations so mistakes will not be made again.
wow. you really don't care about the truth, do you? re-read my other posts and put the word "willful" in front of "ignorance". like i said before, why don't you bother to read the contract that was in effect at trans states at the time all this went down? if you do read it, you will see that tsa holdings blatantly violated the contract. that is the whole point. they violated it and got away with it, despite alpa and the pilot group trying to stand up for what was right. did alpa do everything humanly possible? no, and you've read why. but it all goes back to management starting out the whole process by flushing the contract down the toilet.
dontsurf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CANAM
Hangar Talk
116
10-19-2011 09:35 PM
JetBlast77
Regional
44
07-19-2009 01:19 PM
nciflyer
Aviation Law
11
07-04-2009 01:29 PM
HSLD
Military
0
04-30-2009 05:27 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
4
04-08-2009 08:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices