Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
AP: Pilot Fatigue to be Addressed >

AP: Pilot Fatigue to be Addressed

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

AP: Pilot Fatigue to be Addressed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-02-2009, 08:02 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: CRJ CA
Posts: 180
Default

Reduced capacity? If they reduce their capacity any more in some markets, they'll just be shooting themselves in the foot...pax are so disgusted now with oversells/cancellations and rude gate agents/staff that I've heard more than one talk of driving, taking AMTRAK if it's available or just not traveling.

None of those are good outcomes, and entirely avoidable if the mainline carriers could think beyond the end of the quarter and "analysts expectations". Of course the one long-term thought that all of management has in common is what color their parachute is. Gold seems to be particularly popular in our industry.
nordo is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 08:32 AM
  #12  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 40,107
Default

Originally Posted by CANAM
Something needs to change. Train conductors have way better rest requirements than pilots. In my opinion, they also need to limit the number of legs we can do in a day. There's no way in hell that an 8-leg day is safe for anybody.
It think it is likely that we will see daily legs taken into consideration. Sounds like it will be something along these lines:

12 hours max duty, no extensions.
10 hour max flight, with 2 legs.
More than two legs and you start reducing the legal flight hours. Net result would be a max of 4-5 really short legs, or maybe 3-4 longer legs.
10 hours min rest, not reducible, and starting/ending in the hotel lobby.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 08:43 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DWN3GRN's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: F-4 Wild Weasel
Posts: 361
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
It think it is likely that we will see daily legs taken into consideration. Sounds like it will be something along these lines:

12 hours max duty, no extensions.
10 hour max flight, with 2 legs.
More than two legs and you start reducing the legal flight hours. Net result would be a max of 4-5 really short legs, or maybe 3-4 longer legs.
10 hours min rest, not reducible, and starting/ending in the hotel lobby.

I have also heard the time zone crossing reg. (US only) If anyone of your legs cross a time zone different than your origin airport, you will be limited to 7 hrs. total flight time.
DWN3GRN is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:04 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 691
Default

Originally Posted by iPilot
Even though we all don't want to be paid less lets not forget this is about safety. We've all been pushed to the limits duty wise and I for one think its downright dangerous if done more than once in a great while. Some of the regionals out there push their crews to the limit day in and day out all while sleeping on airplanes overnight and being paid nothing.

Our unions have always been the ones to set days off and pay so they are the ones we need to turn to now and ensure that our QOL doesn't slip because the government is trying to make our jobs a little bit safer.
One has to wonder even if rest requirements improved will these laws have the opposite effect as intended. Will pilots drink more on the road and get less quality of sleep due to all the free time? Will pilots push their commutes and sleep in airports more so they can get more time at home due to reduced days off? Just because something looks good on paper doesn't mean it will have the desired outcome.
jayray2 is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:09 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,814
Default

Oh my god. Can you say girlie-men?? I don't even know what to say, for those hiding behind the veil of "safety." I hear it in the crewroom all the time! Y'all want to never fly more than one leg a day! We've all had a 16-hour, 8-leg day, and if you can't handle that on occasion, you don't belong in the flightdeck!

Incredible...
ExperimentalAB is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:23 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TBucket's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,109
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Oh my god. Can you say girlie-men?? I don't even know what to say, for those hiding behind the veil of "safety." I hear it in the crewroom all the time! Y'all want to never fly more than one leg a day! We've all had a 16-hour, 8-leg day, and if you can't handle that on occasion, you don't belong in the flightdeck!

Incredible...

I think the problem is that it's not "on occasion". It's built into every trip... Just like reduced rest isn't "for emergencies", it's scheduled into trips now...

And, as a pilot, YOU should know better... Just because something is legal, doesn't make it a good idea. Because you got away with flying tired a few (or a few hundred) times doesn't mean it's a safe practice... Cook an engine at v1 in a heavy plane on that 8th leg at 16 hours "legal to start, legal to finish" in the ice and THEN see how "manly" you are.
TBucket is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 10:25 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Posts: 299
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Oh my god. Can you say girlie-men?? I don't even know what to say, for those hiding behind the veil of "safety." I hear it in the crewroom all the time! Y'all want to never fly more than one leg a day! We've all had a 16-hour, 8-leg day, and if you can't handle that on occasion, you don't belong in the flightdeck!

Incredible...
On occasion. Some places do these "girlie-men" 16 hour, 8 leg routes on a daily basis. So since your wonderful place of work, wherever it may be, is so amazing that they only have these days once in a blue moon, please, spread your awesome knowledge around so that others may benefit from the awe-inspiring knowledge you posses to choose airline employers oh great captain of non-fatigue.
Theonemarine is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:28 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
shimmydamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Posts: 202
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Oh my god. Can you say girlie-men?? I don't even know what to say, for those hiding behind the veil of "safety." I hear it in the crewroom all the time! Y'all want to never fly more than one leg a day! We've all had a 16-hour, 8-leg day, and if you can't handle that on occasion, you don't belong in the flightdeck!

Incredible...
Ok Randy Savage.
shimmydamp is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:30 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by ExperimentalAB
Oh my god. Can you say girlie-men?
Keyboard commando at it's best.

Next time I’m fatigued in the cockpit I’ll just make sure to keep flying but at the same time mention that in the event of an incident or accident I don’t want to be called a girlie-man by ExperimentalAB on Airline Pilot Forums for calling in fatigued.. you know, just so it’s on the CVR.
StrikeTime is offline  
Old 09-02-2009, 12:57 PM
  #20  
Che Guevara
 
ToiletDuck's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777
The 20,000 question is will these rules reduce significantly productivity, forcing more work days for less pay?
The $50,000 question is why does anything need to be done when there are perfectly good rules in place that already protect a pilot? I guess the only thing I've thought was BS was the min of 8hrs. Bump it to 9 and call it a day. Most of the fatigue related incidents were because of bad decisions made by the pilots. Laws can't fix that. You can take a horse to water but you can't force him to drink. All a pilot has to do is pickup the phone and say "I'm fatigued" and it's a done deal. I've never called fatigue but we have called and had departures pushed back an extra hour or two and it didn't take much effort.
ToiletDuck is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CANAM
Hangar Talk
116
10-19-2011 09:35 PM
vagabond
Hiring News
6
01-21-2009 03:25 PM
flyboyjake
Part 135
40
12-19-2008 12:20 PM
Russ
Regional
50
12-19-2008 11:28 AM
resetjet
Regional
12
09-16-2008 08:00 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices