Pinnacles MEC passes the TA
08-31-2009, 07:17 AM
#221
Property of Scheduling
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
DTW is "NO town" instead of "Mo town" these days. I would be very proud of my reps if I was DTW based. MEM should be very interesting, MSP should be a discussion, ATL will prob get heated. That's just my weatherman predictions. 10% of the time, it's right 100% of the time.
08-31-2009, 07:49 AM
#222
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: CA
Posts: 534
DTW is "NO town" instead of "Mo town" these days. I would be very proud of my reps if I was DTW based. MEM should be very interesting, MSP should be a discussion, ATL will prob get heated. That's just my weatherman predictions. 10% of the time, it's right 100% of the time.
08-31-2009, 12:45 PM
#224
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
then another 30 day cooling period providing the NMB releases you in the mean time......
..........Reality check....who is going to strike so close to Christmas...YEP Phil and Clive timed this just right....You guys will approve this just to get this past you and still moan and groan on the boards.
Again Pinnacle does what they do best...they have you worn down to the point anything sounds good.
..........Reality check....who is going to strike so close to Christmas...YEP Phil and Clive timed this just right....You guys will approve this just to get this past you and still moan and groan on the boards.
Again Pinnacle does what they do best...they have you worn down to the point anything sounds good.
09-01-2009, 09:29 AM
#227
Line Holder
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: CRJ 200, CRJ900 CA
Posts: 95
The only real argument for this TA is that rejecting it will not result in something better. The NMB will take the process back to square one and in the next agreement (in 2-3 years) they'll never make up any difference. It'll be a squeaker, though, with the deciding factor how much of a bone the mec throws to the reserve guys in the signing bonus.
09-01-2009, 10:05 AM
#228
Property of Scheduling
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 2,573
In my opinion (after talking to many) is that everyon agrees it's not a good deal, but some fear the "what if" by voting no, others just don't care anymore. The signing bonus will sway the vote though- it's a big piece to this puzzle.
This TA will come down to a vote of drive for the future. Those that will "settle" will vote yes, those willing to fight for the industry for decades to come will vote no. It's my opinion at least- and I say "NO" to this TA.
This TA will come down to a vote of drive for the future. Those that will "settle" will vote yes, those willing to fight for the industry for decades to come will vote no. It's my opinion at least- and I say "NO" to this TA.
Last edited by higney85; 09-01-2009 at 10:15 AM.
09-01-2009, 01:18 PM
#229
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: CRJ Captain
Posts: 1,406
In my opinion (after talking to many) is that everyon agrees it's not a good deal, but some fear the "what if" by voting no, others just don't care anymore. The signing bonus will sway the vote though- it's a big piece to this puzzle.
This TA will come down to a vote of drive for the future. Those that will "settle" will vote yes, those willing to fight for the industry for decades to come will vote no. It's my opinion at least- and I say "NO" to this TA.
This TA will come down to a vote of drive for the future. Those that will "settle" will vote yes, those willing to fight for the industry for decades to come will vote no. It's my opinion at least- and I say "NO" to this TA.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
