Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Flew into Mke today

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2009, 10:37 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Fletch727's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 253
Default

Originally Posted by avi8tor4life
Regional flying was unfortunately given away by the mainline pilots years ago. I personally don't like flying an rj for another company. I don't like seeing mainline 737 pilots on the street. I don't like seeing a crj900 in delta colors not being flown by delta pilots. But that's the cards that are on the table and until a mainline Mec grows some balls and gets a hold of thier scope then that is not going to change.
What sickens me about republic is that they are a direct replacement for Midwest pilots at a cheap rate. And like Md80 said there are Replacement Airways pilots going around bragging about their new lax overnight and all this great new flying they are doing. That's the sickening thing. They are nothing but a big middle finger to Midwest guys. They need so get thier collective heads out of the sand and realize what they are actually doing.

And toiletduck, wake turbulence cautions are for 767's and 757's and heavy aircraft as such, not a stinkin e170. Invitation to come back to earth.



Seriously? And you hope to be the captain of an aircraft with people in the back someday?
Fletch727 is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 01:35 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Show me one. Use the search function at the top.
Show us the seniority numbers of these ashamed pilots that are forced to replace mainline Midwest. If it's anything higher than the bottom 10% on either seat, that's a pretty big middle finger I'd say. Not that it matters anyways but since you are coming on here defending against the obvious.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 02:36 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
avi8tor4life's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Left Seat
Posts: 378
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
I've hit the wake of a 737 8 miles ahead of me and it put the ERJ on it's side. He's not a heavy. You don't think a 170 could hit you rough on an approach to landing? They can and they do. Don't underestimate the power of a wake when low and slow, you've got pax back there.
I agree that a 737 is not a "heavy" but will give you a ride. As will an md80. But a 170 10 miles in front of me with a departure of an erj on the same runway in between shouldn't be cause to worry.

And Apc is not where you hear Rah pilots boasting about flying the Midwest flights, that's done while jumpseating to ind and California. I've had a it a couple times already.
avi8tor4life is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 04:33 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saab2000's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,750
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
I've hit the wake of a 737 8 miles ahead of me and it put the ERJ on it's side. He's not a heavy. You don't think a 170 could hit you rough on an approach to landing? They can and they do. Don't underestimate the power of a wake when low and slow, you've got pax back there.
FWIW, the huge blended winglets on the EMB 170/190 series airplanes massively reduce wake vortices. Same on the 737 with winglets.

Not saying one shouldn't be cautious, I have a lot of respect for wakes myself, but the 170 is not really a hazard to safe flight with those big, efficient winglets.
saab2000 is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 04:49 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: http://rahcontractnow.org/
Posts: 206
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Show us the seniority numbers of these ashamed pilots that are forced to replace mainline Midwest. If it's anything higher than the bottom 10% on either seat, that's a pretty big middle finger I'd say. Not that it matters anyways but since you are coming on here defending against the obvious.
Just because you work for Gojet doesn’t mean you have to constantly talk crap about every other carrier. I’ve seen nothing of value come out of your posts. Your attempt at trying to put out a misconception that every carrier is as bad as yours is failing… just stop while you’re at it.

You must be the ashamed pilot, or worn out from working for such an outfit since you have so much to say about everyone else.. Redirect those feelings of hostility elsewhere.. buy yourself a stress ball, maybe that will help or just go get laid if you can afford it. How awesome it is to be anonymous, right?

As for RAH pilots, I am not happy with what is happening but neither are they. A majority of us understand this. If you weren’t so ashamed of yourself maybe you would have the opportunity to talk with some of those pilots (in person rather than behind a keyboard) and realize what the RAH pilot group thinks of this as a whole.
StrikeTime is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 04:53 AM
  #26  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by StrikeTime
If you weren’t so ashamed of yourself maybe you would have the opportunity to talk with some of those pilots (in person rather than behind a keyboard) and realize what the RAH pilot group thinks of this as a whole.
Its much easier for a few posters here to be keyboard commandos with their false logic & assumptions than it would be to actually initiate a face-to-face conversation with RAH crewmembers...
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 06:24 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
CTPILOT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Up front
Posts: 396
Default

The other day I was landing in ___ I was following a 170 in inclement weather they got the plane down SAFELY thats what counts....I was giving instruction in a CESSNA 172 because I'm furloughed.

RAH pilots are doing there job its mgmt you should be bad mouthing not the pilots
CTPILOT is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 07:58 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: EMB 145 FO
Posts: 425
Default

Originally Posted by CANAM
Indeed you did. I suspect some guys just haven't been around in the industry long enough to fully understand how things work. Could you imagine having to sit next to this newbie for a 4-day trip? OY!
Who cares what seat he is in Mr. Sky God? Just because somebody is an FO does not mean his opinion is any less valid than yours. Kind of sounds like the lineholder mentality......im better because I hold a line and I am entitled to more than you... Give me a break. He has a point and you know what, I think he is right. That 170 ahead of him has DESTROYED this industry and our future.
mking84 is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 08:06 AM
  #29  
The NeverEnding Story
 
BoilerUP's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,611
Default

Originally Posted by mking84
That 170 ahead of him has DESTROYED this industry and our future.
An airplane doesn't have the power to do all that destroyin'...only pilots do.
BoilerUP is offline  
Old 08-13-2009, 08:06 AM
  #30  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by CANAM
I have yet to hear a RAH guy bragging about anything. I most certainly have not seen any RAH "licking thier lips" either.

For a guy claiming to fly an MD80, you're making strange bedfellows defending a guy with a picture of a modified CRJ900/B727 as his profile pic.
I have. They are out there.
johnso29 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EWRflyr
Major
26
05-23-2009 07:53 AM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
ToiletDuck
Money Talk
20
10-09-2008 11:16 PM
TonyMontana
Leaving the Career
206
09-30-2008 07:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices