West coast base for RAH!!
#11
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Clear Right 320
Posts: 79
The guy who started a thread with exclamation points at the end who was all excited that "because of ... a downsize of the 73 lift for United in the fall" RAH is going to get a West Coast base.
Congrats! And you're right, this couldn't have been placed in a worse section.
Thank God that most RAH pilots aren't so excited about benefiting from the demise of others.
Congrats! And you're right, this couldn't have been placed in a worse section.
Thank God that most RAH pilots aren't so excited about benefiting from the demise of others.
#12
forgive me for being jumpy. Perhaps you should express your dismay so those exclamation points didn't seem so rejoiceful. I wasn't the only one who thought you were excited.
EDIT: terrible engrish
EDIT: terrible engrish
Last edited by 250 or point 65; 07-08-2009 at 04:23 PM.
#14
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Clear Right 320
Posts: 79
No problem. I should have expressed my self better, also I should have posted this in the right section (I was in the majors section by accident when I posted, chalk that up to old age) I am the least bit excited about this. What the hell is Tilton doing over there?
#15
If you were upset by this, I would suggest changing the title of the thread from "West coast base for RAH!!!!" to "This sucks, more mainline flying being replaced................."
#16
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: Clear Right 320
Posts: 79
Touche' my brother. Nonetheless, Why is it that mainline flying as we know it seems to be eroding in front of my face? seriously, something has to be done or all of us domestic flyers will have to scrap and scrape for any international flying left.
#17
Moderator
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
I'm the lasssstt person to start rumors but according to a very reliable source, because of the success with RAH doing Spokane routes and a downsize of the 73 lift for United in the fall, they (United) is looking at expanding more west coast routes with RAH and a possible SFO domicile is in the works. They even said they (RAH) has been recruiting in LA for FA's already. Can any of you RAH guys validate this?
EDIT: Just realized this was posted in the wrong section. Move it if will be.
EDIT: Just realized this was posted in the wrong section. Move it if will be.
Are you drunk? This is a lot of incoherent rambling.
#18
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: The Beginnings
Posts: 1,317
Transforming from a fee-for-departure, wet-lease airplane shop into an actual airline isn't as easy as it seems. Apparently selling your own tickets and turning an actual profit seems to be rather difficult.
But come on in. The water is fine (pay no attention to all the blood in it). It's a great business that you'd be crazy not to invest billions in!
Last edited by deltabound; 07-08-2009 at 04:52 PM.
#19
Originally Posted by deltabound
Transforming from a fee-for-departure, wet-lease airplane shop into an actual airline isn't as easy as it seems. Apparently selling your own tickets and turning an actual profit seems to be rather difficult.
But you're right, evidently its not that easy to sell your own tickets and turn a profit...even with planes larger than 50 seat RJs. Just ask UAL/AAL/DAL/SWA/FNT/MEH/etc...
#20
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post