Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
A good summary on the regionals in the news >

A good summary on the regionals in the news

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

A good summary on the regionals in the news

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2009, 04:07 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by s10an
Maybe not, but Thats just a guess. What i do know is that if you do not act like one, you will not be treated like one.
The beatings will continue until morale improves huh? Until the company sees us as a notch above a janitor as far as our worth, shirts will continue to be dirty and porno mags and news papers will be all over the glare shield. There is nothing more embarrassing than walking with a fellow pilot that is carrying a back pack or a lunch box but it's understandable why they have them out.
AirWillie is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 04:13 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
colinflyin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: EMJ CA
Posts: 115
Default

Anyone I meet that wants to be a pilot, I tell them not to do it. It's a waste of time and a lot of money, guys that come out of these big aviation schools like Riddle or Western Mich are upwards of 90k in debt. Then to make less than 20k when you get out of training is a slap in the face. But will the pay change; no, because there are people out there like me that will do it cuz they have no choice. However, I love my job and wish I was still flying instead of painting but the industry is so messed up that my airline can't afford to pay me 16k a year. Feels good to vent a lil! ha
colinflyin is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 04:34 PM
  #13  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: MD-80 FO
Posts: 91
Default

I love the "yawns" on here. Would you yawn if it was your Mother or daughter on this flight? And I think that anyone who is competent would realize that "professionalism" doesn't begin and end with airspeed, as if its an open and shut case that could just as easily happenend anywhere else.
Professionalism begins with education.
First, we need to make it a requirement to obtain an ATP to have a bachelor degree. The regionals are filled with hobbyists that quit their jobs as bank tellers in thier late forties and were coddled both through training and by captains who could safely operate single pilot.
Second, we need to require more than 1500 hours to get an ATP. Perhaps 2000 with 500 multi.
Third, SIC's should be required to be Type rated with an ATP. Non of this Low-rent SIC type rating stuff.

After this, a big political push should be taken up to fix the rest requirements. 12 hour duty days would not be outlandish. 14 would be acceptable.

There is too much rif raf at the regional airlines. Hopefully this is enough Blood Priority to prompt the feds to clean it up.

One day, it would be nice to see each airline be single certificate. That is, all airplanes in a particular paint be operated by the airline and that airlines pilots. Continental pilots have a bargaining issue handed to them to recapture all the flying, 100 percent.
FloridaGator is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 04:39 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by RatherBeFishing
If we acted like professionals would they start treating us like professionals?? Absolutely not.
In a sense, yes. I'm not talking about hackneyed MP3 player, spiked hair and backpack debate. I'm talking about if we had our equivalent to the AMA, damn right they'd treat us more like professionals. Instead, we have ALPA and the Teamsters.
Zapata is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 04:43 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
The beatings will continue until morale improves huh? Until the company sees us as a notch above a janitor as far as our worth, shirts will continue to be dirty and porno mags and news papers will be all over the glare shield. There is nothing more embarrassing than walking with a fellow pilot that is carrying a back pack or a lunch box but it's understandable why they have them out.
I have my own view of backpacks, but that is beating a dead horse. That said; What in the heck is unprofessional about a frigging lunch box? If I bring lunch from home to work, I put it in a lunch box because, it's just a container for carrying one's lunch. That's why it's called a lunch box.
Zapata is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:02 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Position: emb-145 ca
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by flycrj200
Lack of attention to airspeed. Pay, rest, commuting, training, and pilot records has nothing to do with airspeed. Paying attention to airspeed is basic airmanship.
Yes, the crew were not looking at (or registering) their instruments. They screwed up.

The crew was the bullet. But what was the gun, and who pulled back on the hammer and set it ready to fire at innocent passengers?

The entire airline financial system, the subcontracting, RFP-ing, undercutting, whipsawing, pilot-concessioning business system that we all work under now is what PUT that sub-par crew there at the pointy end of the plane that night. A crew who for whatever reasons lost a grasp on the life-and-death laser beam focus that is required to safely maneuver a sophisticated airplane.

Under a better financial business system, such a crew might be far less likely to even have the CHANCE TO BE THERE to fail so tragically.

The system that allowed lives to be placed in such peril bears some deep, deep examination.

Last edited by CaptainNameless; 06-21-2009 at 05:31 PM.
CaptainNameless is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:05 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
I have my own view of backpacks, but that is beating a dead horse. That said; What in the heck is unprofessional about a frigging lunch box? If I bring lunch from home to work, I put it in a lunch box because, it's just a container for carrying one's lunch. That's why it's called a lunch box.
Well if you have to use a lunch box because you can't afford to eat, don't bring those colored ones from school that you can spot from the other side of the terminal. Hide it or get one that blends with the flight kit. Have you seen a JAL or Lufthansa crew or British or any other respectable major carrier's pilots with lunch boxes?
AirWillie is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:24 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
btwissel's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: Q400 survivor
Posts: 537
Default

Originally Posted by FloridaGator
First, we need to make it a requirement to obtain an ATP to have a bachelor degree.
not every ATP applicant is an airline pilot. there are plenty that are corporate pilots, private pilots, etc., that just want the ATP to fly their plane, lower insurance, personal ego boost, or what-have-you. you're going to deny all of them


Second, we need to require more than 1500 hours to get an ATP. Perhaps 2000 with 500 multi.
you do realize there are two kinds of ATP certificates, SEL and MEL? there's a separate checkride for each

Third, SIC's should be required to be Type rated with an ATP. None of this Low-rent SIC type rating stuff.
up until Intl. flying required them, the SIC wasn't even needed. and ask your company why they don't just give you the full type on your initial checkout. there's only a couple of items tested that aren't on the SIC ride.

and what ever happened to having a few pilots on the hiring board? used to be that if they had a legitimate issue with the applicant, they tended to not get hired. not enough experience, not hired.

oh, and in general, you've just denied a whole score of military pilots. they tend to come out with ~1000hrs total time. well short of the 2000hrs you suggest. and i bet their experience is, on the whole, more varied than ours (myself definitely included).
btwissel is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:26 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: 747 FO
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by AirWillie
Well if you have to use a lunch box because you can't afford to eat, don't bring those colored ones from school that you can spot from the other side of the terminal. Hide it or get one that blends with the flight kit. Have you seen a JAL or Lufthansa crew or British or any other respectable major carrier's pilots with lunch boxes?
My my, you're being awfully narrow minded and presumptuous. I cannot afford to eat airport food not because of the price but, because most of it is junk and my commitment to good health can't "afford it". I bring food from home whenever I can because it is healthier.

I assure you that I don't carry a novelty lunch box and it is quite nondescript. However, there is no reason to hide it.

Yes, I have seen "respectable carrier's" pilots with lunch boxes. Given all of the guts I see hangover the beltline, lunch boxes should be seen more often.

Why do you have such inane concerns? There are much bigger fish to fry.
Zapata is offline  
Old 06-21-2009, 05:53 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 483
Default

Originally Posted by flycrj200
Lack of attention to airspeed. Pay, rest, commuting, training, and pilot records has nothing to do with airspeed. Paying attention to airspeed is basic airmanship.
You've probably never hand flown a 10-leg 16-hour duty day, huh? Boy that autopilot, FMS, and flight attendant are something else. Hard to pay attention to airspeed or anything else when you're falling asleep while you're flying........not that I've ever done that. Pay, rest, commuting, training, and a pilot's record are all contributing factors to not paying attention to airspeed, I guarantee it.
Copperhed51 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Flyby1206
Regional
138
06-29-2009 09:59 AM
viperdriver
Cargo
7
11-26-2008 12:23 AM
Splanky
Major
4
09-12-2008 04:30 PM
RV-7
Cargo
15
09-03-2008 09:02 PM
Airsupport
Regional
62
08-10-2008 08:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices